Literature DB >> 9159378

Dynamic and conventional spin-echo MR of pituitary microlesions.

W S Bartynski1, L Lin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether dynamic traditional spin-echo MR imaging, with the use of routine T1 parameters during contrast infusion, is superior to standard MR imaging after contrast administration for detecting microlesions of the pituitary gland.
METHODS: Sixty-four patients with pituitary microlesions 3 to 10 mm in diameter were examined with a dynamic traditional spin-echo technique; that is, a typical T1 spin-echo sequence of 500-600/20-25/2 (repetition time/echo time/excitations), 3-mm-thick sections, 16-cm field of view, 256 x 128 matrix, and a scan time ranging from 2 minutes to 2 minutes 40 seconds during contrast infusion. In addition, standard imaging with unenhanced and contrast-enhanced spin-echo sequences were obtained. The three sequences were evaluated retrospectively and graded for gland-lesion contrast conspicuity, lesion homogeneity, and delineation of lesion margin.
RESULTS: The dynamic sequence was judged to be better than the standard enhanced sequence for depicting microlesions in 42% to 47% of patients. Lesions were identified only on the dynamic study in an additional 1% to 14% of patients. Lesions were seen equally well on the standard and dynamic sequences only in 16% to 23% of cases. The standard postcontrast sequence was judged better in 12.5% to 17% of cases, with lesions identified only on the standard sequence in an additional 8% to 9%.
CONCLUSION: Dynamic traditional spin-echo MR imaging improved lesion detection and provided increased clarity over standard sequences after contrast infusion. Both sequences are important, since lesions were detected only on the dynamic sequence in 11% to 14% of patients and only on the standard sequence in 8% to 9% of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9159378      PMCID: PMC8338108     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  18 in total

Review 1.  Neurology of the pituitary gland.

Authors:  J R Anderson; N Antoun; N Burnet; K Chatterjee; O Edwards; J D Pickard; N Sarkies
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Usefulness of the dynamic gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with simultaneous acquisition of coronal and sagittal planes for detection of pituitary microadenomas.

Authors:  Han Bee Lee; Sung Tae Kim; Hyung-Jin Kim; Keon Ha Kim; Pyoung Jeon; Hong Sik Byun; Jin Wook Choi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-09-24       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  State of art imaging of the pituitary tumors.

Authors:  Nicholas J Patronas; Chia-Ying Liu
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Selective inferior petrosal sinus sampling without venous outflow diversion in the detection of a pituitary adenoma in Cushing's syndrome.

Authors:  Lukas Andereggen; Gerhard Schroth; Jan Gralla; Rolf Seiler; Luigi Mariani; Jürgen Beck; Hans-Rudolf Widmer; Robert H Andres; Emanuel Christ; Christoph Ozdoba
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Predictive role of dynamic contrast enhanced T1-weighted MR sequences in pre-surgical evaluation of macroadenomas consistency.

Authors:  Andrea Romano; Valeria Coppola; Mariangela Lombardi; Luigi Lavorato; Domenica Di Stefano; Emanuela Caroli; Maria Camilla Rossi Espagnet; Francesca Tavanti; Giuseppe Minniti; Giuseppe Trillò; Alessandro Bozzao
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.107

6.  Adrenocorticotropic hormone-dependent Cushing's syndrome: sensitivity and specificity of inferior petrosal sinus sampling.

Authors:  F S Bonelli; J Huston; P C Carpenter; D Erickson; W F Young; F B Meyer
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  The effect of MR contrast medium dose on pituitary gland enhancement, microlesion enhancement and pituitary gland-to-lesion contrast conspicuity.

Authors:  Walter S Bartynski; John F Boardman; Stephen Z Grahovac
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Role of imaging in female infertility [Dr. K.M. Rai Memorial Oration Award].

Authors:  Rajul Rastogi
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2010-08

9.  Assessment of pituitary micro-lesions using 3D sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts using different flip-angle evolutions.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Yue Wu; Zhenwei Yao; Zhong Yang
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Assessment of microvessel perfusion of pituitary adenomas: a feasibility study using turbo spin-echo-based intravoxel incoherent motion imaging.

Authors:  Kiyohisa Kamimura; Masanori Nakajo; Tomohide Yoneyama; Yoshihiko Fukukura; Shingo Fujio; Yuko Goto; Takashi Iwanaga; Yuta Akamine; Takashi Yoshiura
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.