Literature DB >> 25949221

Set-up uncertainty during postmastectomy radiotherapy with Segmented Photon Beams Technique.

Anna Semaniak1, Paweł Kukołowicz1.   

Abstract

AIM: To verify the reproducibility of patients irradiated after mastectomy on the immobilization system designed and manufactured for our hospital and to compare the Internal Protocol (IP) with the modified-No Action Level Protocol.
BACKGROUND: Application of forward IMRT techniques requires a good reproducibility of patient positioning. To minimize the set-up error, an effective immobilization system is important.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was performed for two groups of 65 each. In the first group, portal images for anterior field were taken in 1-3 fractions and, subsequently, three times a week. In this group, the mNAL protocol was used. In the second group, the IP was used. The portal images from the anterior field and from the gantry 0 were taken during the 1-3 and 10 fractions. In both groups, image registration was performed off-line. For each group the systematic and random errors and PTV margin were calculated.
RESULTS: In the first group the value of the population systematic errors and random errors were 1.6 ± 1.6 mm for the left-right, and 1.5 ± 1.7 mm for the cranial-caudal directions, respectively, 1.7 ± 1.3 mm, and 1.9 ± 1.3 mm for the second group. The PTV margins for the left-right and cranial-caudal directions were 5.1 and 4.9 mm for the first group and 5.4 and 6.4 mm for the second group.
CONCLUSIONS: For patients immobilized with our support device treated according to the mNAL protocol or IP, a good set-up reproducibility was obtained. Implementation of IP limits the number of required images.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Patient positioning; Random error; Systematic error

Year:  2015        PMID: 25949221      PMCID: PMC4418586          DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2015.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother        ISSN: 1507-1367


  14 in total

1.  Geometrical uncertainties, radiotherapy planning margins, and the ICRU-62 report.

Authors:  Joep C Stroom; Ben J M Heijmen
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  Evaluation of set-up deviations during the irradiation of patients suffering from breast cancer treated with two different techniques.

Authors:  Pawel Franciszek Kukołowicz; Andrzej Debrowski; Piotr Gut; Leszek Chmielewski; Andrzej Wieczorek; Piotr Kedzierawski
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2005-04-18       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  eNAL: an extension of the NAL setup correction protocol for effective use of weekly follow-up measurements.

Authors:  Hans C J de Boer; Ben J M Heijmen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-04-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Segmented photon beams technique for irradiation of postmastectomy patients.

Authors:  Anna Semaniak; Zbigniew Jodkiewicz; Anna Skowrońska-Gardas
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2012-03-08

5.  Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy in node-positive premenopausal women with breast cancer.

Authors:  J Ragaz; S M Jackson; N Le; I H Plenderleith; J J Spinelli; V E Basco; K S Wilson; M A Knowling; C M Coppin; M Paradis; A J Coldman; I A Olivotto
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-10-02       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Comparison of electron IMRT to helical photon IMRT and conventional photon irradiation for treatment of breast and chest wall tumours.

Authors:  Tobias Gauer; Konrad Engel; Antje Kiesel; Dirk Albers; Dirk Rades
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 6.280

7.  Postmastectomy radiotherapy of the chest wall: dosimetric comparison of common techniques.

Authors:  Lori J Pierce; James B Butler; Mary K Martel; Daniel P Normolle; Tod Koelling; Robin B Marsh; Allen S Lichter; Benedick A Fraass
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Electron arc irradiation of the postmastectomy chest wall with CT treatment planning: 20-year experience.

Authors:  D K Gaffney; D D Leavitt; A Tsodikov; L Smith; G Watson; G Patton; F A Gibbs; J R Stewart
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 9.  Set-up verification using portal imaging; review of current clinical practice.

Authors:  C W Hurkmans; P Remeijer; J V Lebesque; B J Mijnheer
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.280

10.  Maximizing setup accuracy using portal images as applied to a conformal boost technique for prostatic cancer.

Authors:  J Bijhold; J V Lebesque; A A Hart; R E Vijlbrief
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 6.280

View more
  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of mechanical and geometric accuracy of two different image guidance systems in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Nithya Kanakavelu; Anand Mambakam Ravindran; Emmanvelrajan James Jebaseelan Samuel
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-01-04

2.  Setup errors and effectiveness of Optical Laser 3D Surface imaging system (Sentinel) in postoperative radiotherapy of breast cancer.

Authors:  Xiaobo Wei; Mengjiao Liu; Yun Ding; Qilin Li; Changhai Cheng; Xian Zong; Wenming Yin; Jie Chen; Wendong Gu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.