Literature DB >> 17394953

eNAL: an extension of the NAL setup correction protocol for effective use of weekly follow-up measurements.

Hans C J de Boer1, Ben J M Heijmen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The no action level (NAL) protocol reduces systematic displacements relative to the planning CT scan by using the mean displacement of the first few treatment fractions as a setup correction in all subsequent fractions. This approach may become nonoptimal in case of time trends or transitions in the systematic displacement of a patient. Here, the extended NAL (eNAL) protocol is introduced to cope with this problem. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The initial setup correction of eNAL is the same as in NAL. However, in eNAL, additional weekly follow-up measurements are performed. The setup correction is updated after each follow-up measurement based on linear regression of the available measured displacements to track and correct systematic time-dependent changes. We investigated the performance of eNAL with Monte Carlo simulations for populations without systematic displacement changes over time, with large gradual changes (time trends), and with large sudden changes (transitions). Weekly follow-up measurements were simulated for 35 treatment fractions. We compared the outcome of eNAL with NAL and optimized shrinking action level (SAL) protocol with weekly measurements.
RESULTS: Without time-dependent changes, eNAL, SAL, and NAL performed comparably, but SAL required the largest imaging workload. For time trends and transitions, eNAL performed superiorly to the other protocols and reduced systematic displacements to the same magnitude as in case of no time-dependent changes (SD approximately 1 mm).
CONCLUSION: Extended NAL can reduce systematic displacements to a minor level irrespective of the precise nature of the systematic time-dependent changes that may occur in a population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17394953     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.11.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  27 in total

Review 1.  A review of image-guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  George T Y Chen; Gregory C Sharp; Shinichiro Mori
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2008-12-16

2.  Setup accuracy for prone and supine whole breast irradiation.

Authors:  Thomas Mulliez; Akos Gulyban; Tom Vercauteren; Annick van Greveling; Bruno Speleers; Wilfried De Neve; Liv Veldeman
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Comparison of set-up errors by breast size on wing board by portal imaging.

Authors:  Waseem Raza; Sushma Agarwal; Koilpillai Joseph Maria Das; Sellepolyam Kaliyaperumal Senthil Kumar; Punita Lal
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-05-06

4.  Correction of systematic set-up error in breast and head and neck irradiation through a no-action level (NAL) protocol.

Authors:  Eva M Lozano; Luis A Pérez; Javier Torres; Carmen Carrascosa; Miguel Sanz; Fermín Mendicote; Antonio Gil
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  Set-up uncertainty during postmastectomy radiotherapy with Segmented Photon Beams Technique.

Authors:  Anna Semaniak; Paweł Kukołowicz
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2015-03-05

6.  Assessment with cone-beam computed tomography of intrafractional motion and interfractional position changes of resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic tumours with implanted fiducial marker.

Authors:  Shingo Ohira; Masaru Isono; Yoshihiro Ueda; Takero Hirata; Reiko Ashida; Hidenori Takahashi; Masayoshi Miyazaki; Masaaki Takashina; Masahiko Koizumi; Teruki Teshima
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Prostate image-guided radiotherapy by megavolt cone-beam CT.

Authors:  Sergio Zucca; Barbara Carau; Ignazio Solla; Elisabetta Garibaldi; Paolo Farace; Giancarlo Lay; Gianfranco Meleddu; Pietro Gabriele
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 3.621

8.  A prospective analysis of inter- and intrafractional errors to calculate CTV to PTV margins in head and neck patients.

Authors:  J Cacicedo; J F Perez; R Ortiz de Zarate; O del Hoyo; F Casquero; A Gómez-Iturriaga; A Lasso; E Boveda; P Bilbao
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 3.405

9.  Clinical implementation of kilovoltage cone beam CT for the verification of sequential and integrated photon boost treatments for breast cancer patients.

Authors:  E M Donovan; I Castellano; S Eagle; E Harris
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Effectiveness of the No action level protocol for head & neck patients - Time considerations.

Authors:  Pawel Kukolowicz; Monika Mietelska; Dorota Kiprian
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2020-04-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.