Literature DB >> 1410582

Maximizing setup accuracy using portal images as applied to a conformal boost technique for prostatic cancer.

J Bijhold1, J V Lebesque, A A Hart, R E Vijlbrief.   

Abstract

A design procedure of a patient setup verification protocol based upon frequent digital acquisition of portal images is demonstrated with an application for conformal prostatic boost fields. The protocol aims at the elimination of large systematic deviations in the patient setup and includes decision rules which indicate when correction of the patient setup is needed. The decision rules were derived from the results of a theoretical and quantitative analysis of patient setup variations measured in three pelvic fields (one anterior-posterior and two lateral fields) of 105 fractions for nine patients. Deviations in the patient positioning, derived from one field, were quantified as two-dimensional (2-D) displacement vectors in the plane perpendicular to the beam axis by alignment of anatomical features in the portal and the simulator image. The magnitude of the overall setup variations along the anterior-posterior, superior-inferior and lateral directions varied between 2.6 and 3 mm (1 S.D.). Inter- and intra-treatment variations could be separated, both having equal magnitudes of 1.7 to 2.2 mm (1 S.D.). In addition, intra-treatment variations appeared to be predictable which was a prerequisite for the development of the decision rules. The 2-D setup deviations, measured in the three fields of one fraction were strongly correlated and a 3-D displacement vector was calculated. Utilization of this 3-D vector in a setup verification protocol may lead to an early detection of systematic setup deviations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1410582     DOI: 10.1016/0167-8140(92)90233-k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  14 in total

1.  Comparisons of the impact of systematic uncertainties in patient setup and prostate motion on doses to the target among different plans for definitive external-beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Su Yu Zhu; Takashi Mizowaki; Yoshiki Norihisa; Kenji Takayama; Yasushi Nagata; Masahiro Hiraoka
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  CTV to PTV margins for prostate irradiation. Three-dimensional quantitative assessment of interfraction uncertainties using portal imaging and serial CT scans.

Authors:  Luis A Pérez-Romasanta; Eva Lozano-Martín; Joaquín Velasco-Jiménez; Fermín Mendicote-León; Miguel Sanz-Martín; Javier Torres-Donaire; Carmen Carrascosa-Fernández; Juan Carlos Zapata-Jimínez; Jacinto Arjona-Gutiérrez; Antonio Gil-Agudo
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Set-up uncertainty during postmastectomy radiotherapy with Segmented Photon Beams Technique.

Authors:  Anna Semaniak; Paweł Kukołowicz
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2015-03-05

4.  Prolonged treatment time deteriorates positioning accuracy for stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Chun-Wei Wang; Yin-Chun Lin; Ham-Min Tseng; Furen Xiao; Chang-Mu Chen; Wei-Li Cheng; Szu-Huai Lu; Keng-Hsueh Lan; Wan-Yu Chen; Hsiang-Kuang Liang; Sung-Hsin Kuo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Evaluation of the setup accuracy of a stereotactic radiotherapy head immobilization mask system using kV on-board imaging.

Authors:  Imad Ali; Jesse Tubbs; Kerry Hibbitts; Ozer Algan; Spencer Thompson; Terence Herman; Salahuddin Ahmad
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Verification of prostate treatment setup using computed radiography for portal imaging.

Authors:  Richard Whittington; Peter Bloch; Della Hutchinson; Bengt E Bjarngard
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Magnitude of shift of tumor position as a function of moderated deep inspiration breath-hold: An analysis of pooled data of lung patients with active breath control in image-guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  K R Muralidhar; P Narayana Murthy; D Shankar Mahadev; K Subramanyam; G Sudarshan; A Krishnam Raju
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2008-10

8.  Prospective evaluation of the setup errors and its impact on safety margin for cervical cancer pelvic conformal radiotherapy.

Authors:  Avinash Badajena; Vijay Parshuram Raturi; Kirti Sirvastava; Hidehiro Hojo; Hajime Ohyoshi; Yanping Bei; Toshiya Rachi; Chen-Ta Wu; Taku Tochinai; Masayuki Okumura; Haiqin Zhang; Hirotaki Kouta; Pragya Verma; Geeta Singh; Abhishek Anand; Anjali Sachan
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2020-02-22

9.  Effectiveness of the No action level protocol for head & neck patients - Time considerations.

Authors:  Pawel Kukolowicz; Monika Mietelska; Dorota Kiprian
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2020-04-12

10.  Intrafraction motion of the prostate during an IMRT session: a fiducial-based 3D measurement with Cone-beam CT.

Authors:  Judit Boda-Heggemann; Frederick Marc Köhler; Hansjörg Wertz; Michael Ehmann; Brigitte Hermann; Nadja Riesenacker; Beate Küpper; Frank Lohr; Frederik Wenz
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.