Literature DB >> 25943082

Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography-Based Specimen-Specific Kinematic Model for Ex Vivo Assessment of Lumbar Neuroforaminal Space.

Robert M Havey1, Jeremy Goodsitt, Saeed Khayatzadeh, Muturi Muriuki, Tejaswy Potluri, Leonard I Voronov, Laurie M Lomasney, Avinash G Patwardhan.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Cadaveric study to accurately measure lumbar neuroforaminal area and height throughout the flexion-extension range of motion (ROM).
OBJECTIVE: Create a new computed tomography (CT)-based specimen-specific model technique to provide insight on the effects of kinematics on lumbar neuroforamen morphology during flexion-extension ROM. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Nerve root compression is a key factor in symptomatic progression of degenerative disc disease because these changes directly affect neuroforaminal area. Traditional techniques to evaluate the neuroforamen suffer from poor accuracy, have inherent limitations, and fail to provide data throughout the ROM.
METHODS: Six cadaveric specimens (L1-sacrum) were instrumented with radiopaque spheres and CT scanned. 3-Dimensional reconstructions were made of each vertebra and the sphere locations determined. During kinematic testing, the spheres were located in relation to optoelectronic targets attached to each vertebra. The result was a 3-dimensional representation of the specimen's CT reconstruction moving in response to experimental data. Bony contours of the L2-L3 and L4-L5 neuroforamen were digitized producing continuous neuroforaminal area and height data throughout the ROM.
RESULTS: Neuroforaminal area and height linearly increased in flexion and decreased in extension. There was significant correlation between flexion-extension motion and percent change in area (L2-L3: 3.1%/deg, R = 0.94, L4-L5: 2.5%/deg, R = 0.90) and neuroforaminal height (L2-L3: 2.1%/deg, R = 0.95, L4-L5: 1.6%/deg, R = 0.93). Regression analysis showed that the ratio between neuroforaminal height and area is at least 1:1.5 such that a 100% increase in height is associated with an area increase of more than 150%.
CONCLUSION: This is the first study to measure lumbar neuroforaminal area and height throughout flexion-extension ROM. The CT-based specimen-specific model technique can accurately evaluate the effect of kinematics on morphological features of the spine. The demonstrated increase in neuroforaminal dimension in flexion is consistent with treatment modalities used in clinical therapies to relieve radicular symptoms. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25943082      PMCID: PMC9578576          DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000959

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.241


  27 in total

1.  Morphologic changes in the lumbar intervertebral foramen due to flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation: an in vitro anatomic and biomechanical study.

Authors:  A Fujiwara; H S An; T H Lim; V M Haughton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Spine update. Lumbar foraminal stenosis.

Authors:  L G Jenis; H S An
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Biomechanical and radiographic analysis of a novel, minimally invasive, extension-limiting device for the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Sylvain Palmer; Andrew Mahar; Richard Oka
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 4.047

4.  The spinal lax zone and neutral zone: measurement techniques and parameter comparisons.

Authors:  N R Crawford; J D Peles; C A Dickman
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1998-10

5.  Effect of axial loading on neural foramina and nerve roots in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  B H Nowicki; S Yu; J Reinartz; F Pintar; N Yoganandan; V M Haughton
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  A morphometric study of the lumbar foramen. Influence of flexion-extension movements and of isolated disc collapse.

Authors:  M A Mayoux-Benhamou; M Revel; C Aaron; G Chomette; B Amor
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.246

7.  Degenerative stenosis of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  D M Spengler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Lateral lumbar spinal canal stenosis: classification, pathologic anatomy and surgical decompression.

Authors:  C K Lee; W Rauschning; W Glenn
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  Lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  W H Kirkaldy-Willis; K W Paine; J Cauchoix; G McIvor
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1974 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  In vivo 3-dimensional morphometric analysis of the lumbar foramen in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Issei Senoo; Alejandro A Espinoza Orías; Howard S An; Gunnar B J Andersson; Daniel K Park; John J Triano; Nozomu Inoue
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  9 in total

1.  Effects of Axial Torsion on Disc Height Distribution: An In Vivo Study.

Authors:  Alejandro A Espinoza Orías; Nicole M Mammoser; John J Triano; Howard S An; Gunnar B J Andersson; Nozomu Inoue
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 1.437

2.  Effectiveness of cervical zero profile integrated cage with and without supplemental posterior Interfacet stabilization.

Authors:  Robert M Havey; Kenneth R Blank; Saeed Khayatzadeh; Muturi G Muriuki; Suguna Pappu; Avinash G Patwardhan
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Estimating Facet Joint Apposition with Specimen-Specific Computer Models of Subaxial Cervical Spine Kinematics.

Authors:  Ryan D Quarrington; Darcy W Thompson-Bagshaw; Claire F Jones
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 4.  Cervical sagittal balance: a biomechanical perspective can help clinical practice.

Authors:  Avinash G Patwardhan; Saeed Khayatzadeh; Robert M Havey; Leonard I Voronov; Zachary A Smith; Olivia Kalmanson; Alexander J Ghanayem; William Sears
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Dimensions of the cervical neural foramen in conditions of spinal deformity: an ex vivo biomechanical investigation using specimen-specific CT imaging.

Authors:  Zachary A Smith; Saeed Khayatzadeh; Joshua Bakhsheshian; Michael Harvey; Robert M Havey; Leonard I Voronov; Muturi G Muriuki; Avinash G Patwardhan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Does Resection of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Affect the Stability of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Leonard I Voronov; Robert M Havey; Parmenion P Tsitsopoulos; Saeed Khayatzadeh; Jeremy Goodsitt; Gerard Carandang; Alexander J Ghanayem; Avinash G Patwardhan
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

7.  Relationships between lumbar inter-vertebral motion and lordosis in healthy adult males: a cross sectional cohort study.

Authors:  Alister du Rose; Alan Breen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Kinematic assessment of an elastic-core cervical disc prosthesis in one and two-level constructs.

Authors:  Richard D Guyer; Leonard I Voronov; Robert M Havey; Saeed Khayatzadeh; Gerard Carandang; Kenneth R Blank; Stephanie Werner; Josh Rubin; Nick Padovani; Avinash G Patwardhan
Journal:  JOR Spine       Date:  2018-12-17

9.  Kinematics of a cervical disc prosthesis implanted above or below one- and two-level fusions.

Authors:  Muturi G Muriuki; Robert M Havey; Jehad Zakaria; Kenneth R Blank; Suguna Pappu; Avinash G Patwardhan
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2022-09-15
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.