STUDY DESIGN: In vivo 3-dimensional (3D) morphometric analysis of the lumbar foramen by using 3D computed tomographic models in normal subjects. OBJECTIVE: To describe foraminal geometry in an asymptomatic cohort measured in 3D. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Appropriate assessment of the complex 3D lumbar foraminal geometry is key to correct radiculopathy diagnosis and treatment planning. To the best of our knowledge, there is no other study that quantifies the normal lumbar foramen 3D geometry considering sex, age groups, and spinal levels in vivo. METHODS: Subject-based 3D computed tomographic lumbar models were created in 59 asymptomatic volunteers and foraminal height and width were measured on the basis of the model by custom software. The foraminal height and width were compared by sex, age, and lumbar level. RESULTS: Overall, the foraminal height decreased with age. However, although the foraminal height in males decreased with age at all spinal levels, the foraminal heights in females did not. The foraminal height was significantly larger in the upper lumbar levels in both sexes. The foraminal width in males was significantly smaller than in females for all age groups. The foraminal width in both sexes also decreased similarly with age. The foraminal widths at the lower lumbar levels were significantly smaller than those at the upper levels. Age-related foraminal width decreases were seen in all lumbar levels as well. CONCLUSION: This study described foraminal geometry in vivo in an asymptomatic cohort measured in 3D. Age-related foraminal height decrease was noticeable in males and in the lower lumbar levels. Age-related foraminal width decrease was shown in both sexes and in all lumbar levels. Such information can be used as baseline data for diagnosis of foraminal stenosis and treatment modality planning.
STUDY DESIGN: In vivo 3-dimensional (3D) morphometric analysis of the lumbar foramen by using 3D computed tomographic models in normal subjects. OBJECTIVE: To describe foraminal geometry in an asymptomatic cohort measured in 3D. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Appropriate assessment of the complex 3D lumbar foraminal geometry is key to correct radiculopathy diagnosis and treatment planning. To the best of our knowledge, there is no other study that quantifies the normal lumbar foramen 3D geometry considering sex, age groups, and spinal levels in vivo. METHODS: Subject-based 3D computed tomographic lumbar models were created in 59 asymptomatic volunteers and foraminal height and width were measured on the basis of the model by custom software. The foraminal height and width were compared by sex, age, and lumbar level. RESULTS: Overall, the foraminal height decreased with age. However, although the foraminal height in males decreased with age at all spinal levels, the foraminal heights in females did not. The foraminal height was significantly larger in the upper lumbar levels in both sexes. The foraminal width in males was significantly smaller than in females for all age groups. The foraminal width in both sexes also decreased similarly with age. The foraminal widths at the lower lumbar levels were significantly smaller than those at the upper levels. Age-related foraminal width decreases were seen in all lumbar levels as well. CONCLUSION: This study described foraminal geometry in vivo in an asymptomatic cohort measured in 3D. Age-related foraminal height decrease was noticeable in males and in the lower lumbar levels. Age-related foraminal width decrease was shown in both sexes and in all lumbar levels. Such information can be used as baseline data for diagnosis of foraminal stenosis and treatment modality planning.
Authors: Yoshihisa Otsuka; Howard S An; Ruth S Ochia; Gunnar B J Andersson; Alejandro A Espinoza Orías; Nozomu Inoue Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2010-04-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Jeffrey M Spivak; Frederick J Kummer; Deyu Chen; Martin Quirno; Jonathan R Kamerlink Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2010-09-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Gregory D Cramer; Joe A Cantu; Richard D Dorsett; Jay S Greenstein; Marion McGregor; Joseph E Howe; William V Glenn Journal: J Manipulative Physiol Ther Date: 2003 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Alejandro A Espinoza Orías; Nicole M Mammoser; John J Triano; Howard S An; Gunnar B J Andersson; Nozomu Inoue Journal: J Manipulative Physiol Ther Date: 2016-04-06 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Robert M Havey; Jeremy Goodsitt; Saeed Khayatzadeh; Muturi Muriuki; Tejaswy Potluri; Leonard I Voronov; Laurie M Lomasney; Avinash G Patwardhan Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2015-07-15 Impact factor: 3.241
Authors: Thomas D Cha; Gregory Moore; Ming Han Lincoln Liow; Weiye Zhong; Minfei Wu; Shaobai Wang; James D Kang; Kirkham B Wood; Guoan Li Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2017-03-15 Impact factor: 3.241