Literature DB >> 9811103

The spinal lax zone and neutral zone: measurement techniques and parameter comparisons.

N R Crawford1, J D Peles, C A Dickman.   

Abstract

The neutral zone (NZ) is a well-established parameter that describes the loose region of the spinal range of motion (ROM) where the spine moves easily with minimal applied force. The loose region is of interest clinically because in vitro studies show that with the onset of instability, this region increases before the ROM increases. The upper boundary of the NZ has been described as the displacement at which ligamentous resistance just begins. However, we hypothesized that a different parameter that we have named the lax zone (LZ) more accurately describes the region of ligamentous laxity. We hypothesized that the NZ is a smaller subset of the LZ that is governed by frictional properties at the joint. Methods for determining the spinal LZ experimentally are introduced. To demonstrate that the LZ is distinct from the NZ, both parameters were quantified in six normal cadaveric human C5-C6 specimens for three different preload magnitudes and three different preload directions. LZ variations with changing preload closely matched variations in the location of the load-deformation curve elbow, whereas NZ values followed specimen resting position instead, verifying parameter independence. Reproducibility and interspecimen variability values were approximately equivalent for both parameters. Compared in a separate data set, NZ and LZ were both more sensitive than ROM in response to cervical discectomy. With discectomy, the absolute change in LZ was larger and the percentage change in LZ was smaller than in NZ. The NZ may be a more appropriate measure when investigating the biomechanical effect of alterations to joint articulations and when the loading environment is well controlled. The LZ may be a more appropriate measure when investigating the effect of ligament/disc alterations and when the loading environment cannot be controlled. Future work is needed to compare the sensitivities of the LZ and NZ in detecting spinal instability onset for various injuries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9811103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord        ISSN: 0895-0385


  16 in total

1.  The effect of loading rate and degeneration on neutral region motion in human cadaveric lumbar motion segments.

Authors:  Ralph E Gay; Brice Ilharreborde; Kristin Zhao; Emir Boumediene; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  In vitro 3D-kinematics of the upper cervical spine: helical axis and simulation for axial rotation and flexion extension.

Authors:  Pierre-Michel Dugailly; Stéphane Sobczak; Victor Sholukha; Serge Van Sint Jan; Patrick Salvia; Véronique Feipel; Marcel Rooze
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2009-09-12       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  [Effect of lumbar hybrid instrumentation and rigid fusion on the treated and the adjacent segments. A biomechanical study].

Authors:  B Wiedenhöfer; M Akbar; C H Fürstenberg; C Carstens; S Hemmer; C Schilling
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Biomechanics of Cervical "Skip" Corpectomy Versus Standard Multilevel Corpectomy.

Authors:  Murat Yilmaz; Kasim Zafer Yüksel; Seungwon Baek; Anna G U S Newcomb; Sedat Dalbayrak; Volker K H Sonntag; Neil R Crawford
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.876

5.  Operated and adjacent segment motions for fusion versus cervical arthroplasty: a pilot study.

Authors:  Tomoya Terai; Ahmad Faizan; Koichi Sairyo; Vijay K Goel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  In vitro analysis of circumferential joint replacement, including bilateral facet joint replacement with lateral lumber disc prosthesis: a parametric investigation of disc sizing.

Authors:  Mark Moldavsky; Pavel Neumann; Noelle Klocke; Mir Hussain; Brandon S Bucklen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Comparing the Biomechanical Stability of Cortical Screw Trajectory Versus Standard Pedicle Screw Trajectory for Short- and Long-Segment Posterior Fixation in 3-Column Thoracic Spinal Injury.

Authors:  Amey R Savardekar; Nestor G Rodriguez-Martinez; Anna G U S Newcomb; Phillip M Reyes; Hector Soriano-Baron; Steve W Chang; Brian P Kelly; Neil R Crawford
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-06-30

8.  Biomechanical evaluation of interbody fixation with secondary augmentation: lateral lumbar interbody fusion versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Jakub Godzik; Samuel Kalb; Marco T Reis; Phillip M Reyes; Vaneet Singh; Anna G U S Newcomb; Steve W Chang; Brian P Kelly; Neil R Crawford
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-06

9.  Variations Among Human Lumbar Spine Segments and Their Relationships to In Vitro Biomechanics: A Retrospective Analysis of 281 Motion Segments From 85 Cadaveric Spines.

Authors:  Anna G U Sawa; Jennifer N Lehrman; Neil R Crawford; Brian P Kelly
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-04-30

10.  Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography-Based Specimen-Specific Kinematic Model for Ex Vivo Assessment of Lumbar Neuroforaminal Space.

Authors:  Robert M Havey; Jeremy Goodsitt; Saeed Khayatzadeh; Muturi Muriuki; Tejaswy Potluri; Leonard I Voronov; Laurie M Lomasney; Avinash G Patwardhan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.