Literature DB >> 27402747

Groundwater methane in relation to oil and gas development and shallow coal seams in the Denver-Julesburg Basin of Colorado.

Owen A Sherwood1, Jessica D Rogers2, Greg Lackey2, Troy L Burke2, Stephen G Osborn3, Joseph N Ryan2.   

Abstract

Unconventional oil and gas development has generated intense public concerns about potential impacts to groundwater quality. Specific pathways of contamination have been identified; however, overall rates of contamination remain ambiguous. We used an archive of geochemical data collected from 1988 to 2014 to determine the sources and occurrence of groundwater methane in the Denver-Julesburg Basin of northeastern Colorado. This 60,000-km(2) region has a 60-y-long history of hydraulic fracturing, with horizontal drilling and high-volume hydraulic fracturing beginning in 2010. Of 924 sampled water wells in the basin, dissolved methane was detected in 593 wells at depths of 20-190 m. Based on carbon and hydrogen stable isotopes and gas molecular ratios, most of this methane was microbially generated, likely within shallow coal seams. A total of 42 water wells contained thermogenic stray gas originating from underlying oil and gas producing formations. Inadequate surface casing and leaks in production casing and wellhead seals in older, vertical oil and gas wells were identified as stray gas migration pathways. The rate of oil and gas wellbore failure was estimated as 0.06% of the 54,000 oil and gas wells in the basin (lower estimate) to 0.15% of the 20,700 wells in the area where stray gas contamination occurred (upper estimate) and has remained steady at about two cases per year since 2001. These results show that wellbore barrier failure, not high-volume hydraulic fracturing in horizontal wells, is the main cause of thermogenic stray gas migration in this oil- and gas-producing basin.

Entities:  

Keywords:  groundwater; hydraulic fracturing; methane; stray gas; unconventional oil and gas

Year:  2016        PMID: 27402747      PMCID: PMC4968736          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1523267113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  15 in total

1.  An evaluation of water quality in private drinking water wells near natural gas extraction sites in the Barnett Shale formation.

Authors:  Brian E Fontenot; Laura R Hunt; Zacariah L Hildenbrand; Doug D Carlton; Hyppolite Oka; Jayme L Walton; Dan Hopkins; Alexandra Osorio; Bryan Bjorndal; Qinhong H Hu; Kevin A Schug
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Oxidation of fugitive methane in ground water linked to bacterial sulfate reduction.

Authors:  Dale Van Stempvoort; Harm Maathuis; Ed Jaworski; Bernhard Mayer; Kathleen Rich
Journal:  Ground Water       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.671

3.  Occurrence and origin of methane in groundwater in Alberta (Canada): Gas geochemical and isotopic approaches.

Authors:  P Humez; B Mayer; J Ing; M Nightingale; V Becker; A Kingston; O Akbilgic; S Taylor
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  The integrity of oil and gas wells.

Authors:  Robert B Jackson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Noble gases identify the mechanisms of fugitive gas contamination in drinking-water wells overlying the Marcellus and Barnett Shales.

Authors:  Thomas H Darrah; Avner Vengosh; Robert B Jackson; Nathaniel R Warner; Robert J Poreda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  A critical review of the risks to water resources from unconventional shale gas development and hydraulic fracturing in the United States.

Authors:  Avner Vengosh; Robert B Jackson; Nathaniel Warner; Thomas H Darrah; Andrew Kondash
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Distribution and origin of groundwater methane in the Wattenberg oil and gas field of northern Colorado.

Authors:  Huishu Li; Kenneth H Carlson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Groundwater protection and unconventional gas extraction: the critical need for field-based hydrogeological research.

Authors:  R E Jackson; A W Gorody; B Mayer; J W Roy; M C Ryan; D R Van Stempvoort
Journal:  Ground Water       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 2.671

9.  Composite geochemical database for coalbed methane produced water quality in the Rocky Mountain region.

Authors:  Katharine G Dahm; Katie L Guerra; Pei Xu; Jörg E Drewes
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 10.  Impact of shale gas development on regional water quality.

Authors:  R D Vidic; S L Brantley; J M Vandenbossche; D Yoxtheimer; J D Abad
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  5 in total

1.  Colorado Water Watch: real-time groundwater monitoring for possible contamination from oil and gas activities.

Authors:  Ji-Hee Son; Asma Hanif; Ashwin Dhanasekar; Kenneth H Carlson
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Geochemical Evidence of Potential Groundwater Contamination with Human Health Risks Where Hydraulic Fracturing Overlaps with Extensive Legacy Hydrocarbon Extraction.

Authors:  Samuel W Shaheen; Tao Wen; Alison Herman; Susan L Brantley
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 11.357

Review 3.  Critical evaluation of human health risks due to hydraulic fracturing in natural gas and petroleum production.

Authors:  Klaus-Michael Wollin; G Damm; H Foth; A Freyberger; T Gebel; A Mangerich; U Gundert-Remy; F Partosch; C Röhl; T Schupp; Jan G Hengstler
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-05-09       Impact factor: 5.153

4.  Methane in groundwater before, during, and after hydraulic fracturing of the Marcellus Shale.

Authors:  E Barth-Naftilan; J Sohng; J E Saiers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Public data from three US states provide new insights into well integrity.

Authors:  Greg Lackey; Harihar Rajaram; James Bolander; Owen A Sherwood; Joseph N Ryan; Chung Yan Shih; Grant S Bromhal; Robert M Dilmore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 11.205

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.