Literature DB >> 22778445

Geochemical evidence for possible natural migration of Marcellus Formation brine to shallow aquifers in Pennsylvania.

Nathaniel R Warner1, Robert B Jackson, Thomas H Darrah, Stephen G Osborn, Adrian Down, Kaiguang Zhao, Alissa White, Avner Vengosh.   

Abstract

The debate surrounding the safety of shale gas development in the Appalachian Basin has generated increased awareness of drinking water quality in rural communities. Concerns include the potential for migration of stray gas, metal-rich formation brines, and hydraulic fracturing and/or flowback fluids to drinking water aquifers. A critical question common to these environmental risks is the hydraulic connectivity between the shale gas formations and the overlying shallow drinking water aquifers. We present geochemical evidence from northeastern Pennsylvania showing that pathways, unrelated to recent drilling activities, exist in some locations between deep underlying formations and shallow drinking water aquifers. Integration of chemical data (Br, Cl, Na, Ba, Sr, and Li) and isotopic ratios ((87)Sr/(86)Sr, (2)H/H, (18)O/(16)O, and (228)Ra/(226)Ra) from this and previous studies in 426 shallow groundwater samples and 83 northern Appalachian brine samples suggest that mixing relationships between shallow ground water and a deep formation brine causes groundwater salinization in some locations. The strong geochemical fingerprint in the salinized (Cl > 20 mg/L) groundwater sampled from the Alluvium, Catskill, and Lock Haven aquifers suggests possible migration of Marcellus brine through naturally occurring pathways. The occurrences of saline water do not correlate with the location of shale-gas wells and are consistent with reported data before rapid shale-gas development in the region; however, the presence of these fluids suggests conductive pathways and specific geostructural and/or hydrodynamic regimes in northeastern Pennsylvania that are at increased risk for contamination of shallow drinking water resources, particularly by fugitive gases, because of natural hydraulic connections to deeper formations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22778445      PMCID: PMC3409753          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1121181109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  8 in total

1.  Measurement of 224Ra and 225Ra activities in natural waters using a radon-in-air monitor.

Authors:  G Kim; W C Burnett; H Dulaiova; P W Swarzenski; W S Moore
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Geochemical and strontium isotope characterization of produced waters from Marcellus Shale natural gas extraction.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Chapman; Rosemary C Capo; Brian W Stewart; Carl S Kirby; Richard W Hammack; Karl T Schroeder; Harry M Edenborn
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Natural gas plays in the Marcellus Shale: challenges and potential opportunities.

Authors:  David M Kargbo; Ron G Wilhelm; David J Campbell
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Energy. Natural gas from shale bursts onto the scene.

Authors:  Richard A Kerr
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Natural gas: Should fracking stop?

Authors:  Robert W Howarth; Anthony Ingraffea; Terry Engelder
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Geologic emissions of methane to the atmosphere.

Authors:  Giuseppe Etiope; Ronald W Klusman
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 7.086

7.  Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing.

Authors:  Stephen G Osborn; Avner Vengosh; Nathaniel R Warner; Robert B Jackson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The evaporation path of seawater and the coprecipitation of Br- and K+ with halite.

Authors:  M A McCaffrey; B Lazar; H D Holland
Journal:  J Sediment Petrol       Date:  1987-09
  8 in total
  42 in total

1.  Elevated levels of diesel range organic compounds in groundwater near Marcellus gas operations are derived from surface activities.

Authors:  Brian D Drollette; Kathrin Hoelzer; Nathaniel R Warner; Thomas H Darrah; Osman Karatum; Megan P O'Connor; Robert K Nelson; Loretta A Fernandez; Christopher M Reddy; Avner Vengosh; Robert B Jackson; Martin Elsner; Desiree L Plata
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Inorganic contaminants from diffuse pollution in shallow groundwater of the Campanian Plain (Southern Italy). Implications for geochemical survey.

Authors:  E Cuoco; T H Darrah; G Buono; G Verrengia; S De Francesco; W K Eymold; D Tedesco
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 3.  Managing produced water from coal seam gas projects: implications for an emerging industry in Australia.

Authors:  Peter J Davies; Damian B Gore; Stuart J Khan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 4.  Extensive review of shale gas environmental impacts from scientific literature (2010-2015).

Authors:  Daniele Costa; João Jesus; David Branco; Anthony Danko; António Fiúza
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 5.  A review of the public health impacts of unconventional natural gas development.

Authors:  P J Saunders; D McCoy; R Goldstein; A T Saunders; A Munroe
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.609

6.  Capillary tension and imbibition sequester frack fluid in Marcellus gas shale.

Authors:  Terry Engelder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Shale gas development impacts on surface water quality in Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Sheila M Olmstead; Lucija A Muehlenbachs; Jhih-Shyang Shih; Ziyan Chu; Alan J Krupnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Monitoring concentration and isotopic composition of methane in groundwater in the Utica Shale hydraulic fracturing region of Ohio.

Authors:  E Claire Botner; Amy Townsend-Small; David B Nash; Xiaomei Xu; Arndt Schimmelmann; Joshua H Miller
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 2.513

9.  Detecting and explaining why aquifers occasionally become degraded near hydraulically fractured shale gas wells.

Authors:  Josh Woda; Tao Wen; David Oakley; David Yoxtheimer; Terry Engelder; M Clara Castro; Susan L Brantley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Adverse Reproductive and Developmental Health Outcomes Following Prenatal Exposure to a Hydraulic Fracturing Chemical Mixture in Female C57Bl/6 Mice.

Authors:  Christopher D Kassotis; John J Bromfield; Kara C Klemp; Chun-Xia Meng; Andrew Wolfe; R Thomas Zoeller; Victoria D Balise; Chiamaka J Isiguzo; Donald E Tillitt; Susan C Nagel
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 4.736

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.