Literature DB >> 26460018

Elevated levels of diesel range organic compounds in groundwater near Marcellus gas operations are derived from surface activities.

Brian D Drollette1, Kathrin Hoelzer2, Nathaniel R Warner3, Thomas H Darrah4, Osman Karatum5, Megan P O'Connor5, Robert K Nelson6, Loretta A Fernandez7, Christopher M Reddy6, Avner Vengosh8, Robert B Jackson9, Martin Elsner2, Desiree L Plata10.   

Abstract

Hundreds of organic chemicals are used during natural gas extraction via high-volume hydraulic fracturing (HVHF). However, it is unclear whether these chemicals, injected into deep shale horizons, reach shallow groundwater aquifers and affect local water quality, either from those deep HVHF injection sites or from the surface or shallow subsurface. Here, we report detectable levels of organic compounds in shallow groundwater samples from private residential wells overlying the Marcellus Shale in northeastern Pennsylvania. Analyses of purgeable and extractable organic compounds from 64 groundwater samples revealed trace levels of volatile organic compounds, well below the Environmental Protection Agency's maximum contaminant levels, and low levels of both gasoline range (0-8 ppb) and diesel range organic compounds (DRO; 0-157 ppb). A compound-specific analysis revealed the presence of bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, which is a disclosed HVHF additive, that was notably absent in a representative geogenic water sample and field blanks. Pairing these analyses with (i) inorganic chemical fingerprinting of deep saline groundwater, (ii) characteristic noble gas isotopes, and (iii) spatial relationships between active shale gas extraction wells and wells with disclosed environmental health and safety violations, we differentiate between a chemical signature associated with naturally occurring saline groundwater and one associated with alternative anthropogenic routes from the surface (e.g., accidental spills or leaks). The data support a transport mechanism of DRO to groundwater via accidental release of fracturing fluid chemicals derived from the surface rather than subsurface flow of these fluids from the underlying shale formation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  groundwater; high-volume hydraulic fracturing; hydrophobic organic contaminants; natural gas extraction; transport mechanisms

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26460018      PMCID: PMC4629325          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1511474112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  22 in total

1.  Geochemical evidence for possible natural migration of Marcellus Formation brine to shallow aquifers in Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Nathaniel R Warner; Robert B Jackson; Thomas H Darrah; Stephen G Osborn; Adrian Down; Kaiguang Zhao; Alissa White; Avner Vengosh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Energy. Natural gas from shale bursts onto the scene.

Authors:  Richard A Kerr
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Natural gas: Should fracking stop?

Authors:  Robert W Howarth; Anthony Ingraffea; Terry Engelder
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  New tracers identify hydraulic fracturing fluids and accidental releases from oil and gas operations.

Authors:  N R Warner; T H Darrah; R B Jackson; R Millot; W Kloppmann; A Vengosh
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Analysis of reserve pit sludge from unconventional natural gas hydraulic fracturing and drilling operations for the presence of technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive material (TENORM).

Authors:  Alisa L Rich; Ernest C Crosby
Journal:  New Solut       Date:  2013

6.  Gas revolution. The gas surge. Introduction.

Authors:  David Malakoff
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  A critical review of the risks to water resources from unconventional shale gas development and hydraulic fracturing in the United States.

Authors:  Avner Vengosh; Robert B Jackson; Nathaniel Warner; Thomas H Darrah; Andrew Kondash
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Evolution of multi-well pad development and influence of well pads on environmental violations and wastewater volumes in the Marcellus shale (USA).

Authors:  Alex K Manda; Jamie L Heath; Wendy A Klein; Michael T Griffin; Burrell E Montz
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 6.789

9.  Organic compounds in produced waters from shale gas wells.

Authors:  Samuel J Maguire-Boyle; Andrew R Barron
Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.238

10.  Natural attenuation of diesel aliphatic hydrocarbons in contaminated agricultural soil.

Authors:  Antonio Serrano; Mercedes Gallego; Jose Luis González; Manuel Tejada
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 8.071

View more
  22 in total

1.  Hydraulic fracturing near domestic groundwater wells.

Authors:  Scott Jasechko; Debra Perrone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  A review of the public health impacts of unconventional natural gas development.

Authors:  P J Saunders; D McCoy; R Goldstein; A T Saunders; A Munroe
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.609

3.  Association of groundwater constituents with topography and distance to unconventional gas wells in NE Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Beizhan Yan; Martin Stute; Reynold A Panettieri; James Ross; Brian Mailloux; Matthew J Neidell; Lissa Soares; Marilyn Howarth; Xinhua Liu; Pouné Saberi; Steven N Chillrud
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Surface water and groundwater analysis using aryl hydrocarbon and endocrine receptor biological assays and liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry in Susquehanna County, PA.

Authors:  Michelle Bamberger; Marika Nell; Ahmed H Ahmed; Renee Santoro; Anthony R Ingraffea; Rana F Kennedy; Susan C Nagel; Damian E Helbling; Robert E Oswald
Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 4.238

5.  Unconventional oil and gas development and risk of childhood leukemia: Assessing the evidence.

Authors:  Elise G Elliott; Pauline Trinh; Xiaomei Ma; Brian P Leaderer; Mary H Ward; Nicole C Deziel
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-10-23       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  A decision analysis framework for estimating the potential hazards for drinking water resources of chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing fluids.

Authors:  Erin E Yost; John Stanek; Lyle D Burgoon
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Monitoring concentration and isotopic composition of methane in groundwater in the Utica Shale hydraulic fracturing region of Ohio.

Authors:  E Claire Botner; Amy Townsend-Small; David B Nash; Xiaomei Xu; Arndt Schimmelmann; Joshua H Miller
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Adverse Reproductive and Developmental Health Outcomes Following Prenatal Exposure to a Hydraulic Fracturing Chemical Mixture in Female C57Bl/6 Mice.

Authors:  Christopher D Kassotis; John J Bromfield; Kara C Klemp; Chun-Xia Meng; Andrew Wolfe; R Thomas Zoeller; Victoria D Balise; Chiamaka J Isiguzo; Donald E Tillitt; Susan C Nagel
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 4.736

Review 9.  Developmental exposure to a mixture of unconventional oil and gas chemicals: A review of experimental effects on adult health, behavior, and disease.

Authors:  S C Nagel; C D Kassotis; L N Vandenberg; B P Lawrence; J Robert; V D Balise
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 4.102

10.  Unconventional oil and gas chemicals and wastewater-impacted water samples promote adipogenesis via PPARγ-dependent and independent mechanisms in 3T3-L1 cells.

Authors:  Christopher D Kassotis; Susan C Nagel; Heather M Stapleton
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 7.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.