Literature DB >> 29721622

Monitoring concentration and isotopic composition of methane in groundwater in the Utica Shale hydraulic fracturing region of Ohio.

E Claire Botner1, Amy Townsend-Small2, David B Nash1, Xiaomei Xu3, Arndt Schimmelmann4, Joshua H Miller1.   

Abstract

Degradation of groundwater quality is a primary public concern in rural hydraulic fracturing areas. Previous studies have shown that natural gas methane (CH4) is present in groundwater near shale gas wells in the Marcellus Shale of Pennsylvania, but did not have pre-drilling baseline measurements. Here, we present the results of a free public water testing program in the Utica Shale of Ohio, where we measured CH4 concentration, CH4 stable isotopic composition, and pH and conductivity along temporal and spatial gradients of hydraulic fracturing activity. Dissolved CH4 ranged from 0.2 μg/L to 25 mg/L, and stable isotopic measurements indicated a predominantly biogenic carbonate reduction CH4 source. Radiocarbon dating of CH4 in combination with stable isotopic analysis of CH4 in three samples indicated that fossil C substrates are the source of CH4 in groundwater, with one 14C date indicative of modern biogenic carbonate reduction. We found no relationship between CH4 concentration or source in groundwater and proximity to active gas well sites. No significant changes in CH4 concentration, CH4 isotopic composition, pH, or conductivity in water wells were observed during the study period. These data indicate that high levels of biogenic CH4 can be present in groundwater wells independent of hydraulic fracturing activity and affirm the need for isotopic or other fingerprinting techniques for CH4 source identification. Continued monitoring of private drinking water wells is critical to ensure that groundwater quality is not altered as hydraulic fracturing activity continues in the region. Graphical abstract A shale gas well in rural Appalachian Ohio. Photo credit: Claire Botner.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Groundwater; Hydraulic fracturing; Methane; Natural gas; Radiocarbon; Stable isotopes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29721622     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-018-6696-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  21 in total

1.  Energy. Natural gas from shale bursts onto the scene.

Authors:  Richard A Kerr
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Noble gases identify the mechanisms of fugitive gas contamination in drinking-water wells overlying the Marcellus and Barnett Shales.

Authors:  Thomas H Darrah; Avner Vengosh; Robert B Jackson; Nathaniel R Warner; Robert J Poreda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  A critical review of the risks to water resources from unconventional shale gas development and hydraulic fracturing in the United States.

Authors:  Avner Vengosh; Robert B Jackson; Nathaniel Warner; Thomas H Darrah; Andrew Kondash
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Impact to Underground Sources of Drinking Water and Domestic Wells from Production Well Stimulation and Completion Practices in the Pavillion, Wyoming, Field.

Authors:  Dominic C DiGiulio; Robert B Jackson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Estimating Emissions of Toxic Hydrocarbons from Natural Gas Production Sites in the Barnett Shale Region of Northern Texas.

Authors:  Josette E Marrero; Amy Townsend-Small; David R Lyon; Tracy R Tsai; Simone Meinardi; Donald R Blake
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Methane baseline concentrations and sources in shallow aquifers from the shale gas-prone region of the St. Lawrence lowlands (Quebec, Canada).

Authors:  Anja Moritz; Jean-Francois Hélie; Daniele L Pinti; Marie Larocque; Diogo Barnetche; Sophie Retailleau; René Lefebvre; Yves Gélinas
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Integrating Source Apportionment Tracers into a Bottom-up Inventory of Methane Emissions in the Barnett Shale Hydraulic Fracturing Region.

Authors:  Amy Townsend-Small; Josette E Marrero; David R Lyon; Isobel J Simpson; Simone Meinardi; Donald R Blake
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  A Comprehensive Analysis of Groundwater Quality in The Barnett Shale Region.

Authors:  Zacariah L Hildenbrand; Doug D Carlton; Brian E Fontenot; Jesse M Meik; Jayme L Walton; Josh T Taylor; Jonathan B Thacker; Stephanie Korlie; C Phillip Shelor; Drew Henderson; Akinde F Kadjo; Corey E Roelke; Paul F Hudak; Taylour Burton; Hanadi S Rifai; Kevin A Schug
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  δ13C and δ2H measurement of methane from ecological and geological sources by gas chromatography/combustion/pyrolysis isotope-ratio mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Chris Yarnes
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 10.  Impact of shale gas development on regional water quality.

Authors:  R D Vidic; S L Brantley; J M Vandenbossche; D Yoxtheimer; J D Abad
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  2 in total

1.  Natural and Anthropogenic Processes Affecting Domestic Groundwater Quality within the Northwestern Appalachian Basin.

Authors:  H G Siegel; M A Soriano; C J Clark; N P Johnson; H G Wulsin; N C Deziel; D L Plata; T H Darrah; J E Saiers
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 11.357

2.  Fluorescence Characteristics of Coalbed Methane Produced Water and Its Influence on Freshwater Bacteria in the South Qinshui Basin, China.

Authors:  Tao Jin; Qingjun Meng; Xiangdong Li; Lai Zhou
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.