Elton Lik Tong Tay1, Vernon Khet Yau Yong2, Boon Ang Lim2, Stelson Sia3, Elizabeth Poh Ying Wong2, Leonard Wei Leon Yip2. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore 308433, Singapore ; Republic of Singapore Air Force Aeromedical Centre, Singapore 539945, Singapore. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore 308433, Singapore. 3. Cardinal Santos Medical Center, San Juan City, Metro Manila 1502, Philippines.
Abstract
AIM: To determine angle closure agreements between gonioscopy and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), as well as gonioscopy and spectral domain OCT (SD-OCT). A secondary objective was to quantify inter-observer agreements of AS-OCT and SD-OCT assessments. METHODS: Seventeen consecutive subjects (33 eyes) were recruited from the study hospital's Glaucoma clinic. Gonioscopy was performed by a glaucomatologist masked to OCT results. OCT images were read independently by 2 other glaucomatologists masked to gonioscopy findings as well as each other's analyses of OCT images. RESULTS: Totally 84.8% and 45.5% of scleral spurs were visualized in AS-OCT and SD-OCT images respectively (P<0.01). The agreement for angle closure between AS-OCT and gonioscopy was fair at k=0.31 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.03-0.59) and k=0.35 (95% CI: 0.07-0.63) for reader 1 and 2 respectively. The agreement for angle closure between SD-OCT and gonioscopy was fair at k=0.21 (95% CI: 0.07-0.49) and slight at k=0.17 (95% CI: 0.08-0.42) for reader 1 and 2 respectively. The inter-reader agreement for angle closure in AS-OCT images was moderate at 0.51 (95% CI: 0.13-0.88). The inter-reader agreement for angle closure in SD-OCT images was slight at 0.18 (95% CI: 0.08-0.45). CONCLUSION: Significant proportion of scleral spurs were not visualised with SD-OCT imaging resulting in weaker inter-reader agreements. Identifying other angle landmarks in SD-OCT images will allow more consistent angle closure assessments. Gonioscopy and OCT imaging do not always agree in angle closure assessments but have their own advantages, and should be used together and not exclusively.
AIM: To determine angle closure agreements between gonioscopy and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), as well as gonioscopy and spectral domain OCT (SD-OCT). A secondary objective was to quantify inter-observer agreements of AS-OCT and SD-OCT assessments. METHODS: Seventeen consecutive subjects (33 eyes) were recruited from the study hospital's Glaucoma clinic. Gonioscopy was performed by a glaucomatologist masked to OCT results. OCT images were read independently by 2 other glaucomatologists masked to gonioscopy findings as well as each other's analyses of OCT images. RESULTS: Totally 84.8% and 45.5% of scleral spurs were visualized in AS-OCT and SD-OCT images respectively (P<0.01). The agreement for angle closure between AS-OCT and gonioscopy was fair at k=0.31 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.03-0.59) and k=0.35 (95% CI: 0.07-0.63) for reader 1 and 2 respectively. The agreement for angle closure between SD-OCT and gonioscopy was fair at k=0.21 (95% CI: 0.07-0.49) and slight at k=0.17 (95% CI: 0.08-0.42) for reader 1 and 2 respectively. The inter-reader agreement for angle closure in AS-OCT images was moderate at 0.51 (95% CI: 0.13-0.88). The inter-reader agreement for angle closure in SD-OCT images was slight at 0.18 (95% CI: 0.08-0.45). CONCLUSION: Significant proportion of scleral spurs were not visualised with SD-OCT imaging resulting in weaker inter-reader agreements. Identifying other angle landmarks in SD-OCT images will allow more consistent angle closure assessments. Gonioscopy and OCT imaging do not always agree in angle closure assessments but have their own advantages, and should be used together and not exclusively.
Authors: Maciej Wojtkowski; Tomasz Bajraszewski; Iwona Gorczyńska; Piotr Targowski; Andrzej Kowalczyk; Wojciech Wasilewski; Czesław Radzewicz Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Lisandro M Sakata; Raghavan Lavanya; David S Friedman; Han T Aung; Hong Gao; Rajesh S Kumar; Paul J Foster; Tin Aung Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2007-10-04 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Lisandro M Sakata; Raghavan Lavanya; David S Friedman; Han T Aung; Steve K Seah; Paul J Foster; Tin Aung Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2008-02
Authors: Gavin S Tan; Mingguang He; Wanting Zhao; Lisandro M Sakata; Jialiang Li; Monisha E Nongpiur; Raghavan Lavanya; David S Friedman; Tin Aung Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2012-04-01 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Mohammed Rigi; Nicholas P Bell; David A Lee; Laura A Baker; Alice Z Chuang; Donna Nguyen; Vandana R Minnal; Robert M Feldman; Lauren S Blieden Journal: J Ophthalmol Date: 2016-11-20 Impact factor: 1.909