| Literature DB >> 25934642 |
Vasudevan Achuthan1, Jeffrey J DeStefano2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fidelity of DNA polymerases can be influenced by cation co-factors. Physiologically, Mg(2+) is used as a co-factor by HIV reverse transcriptase (RT) to perform catalysis; however, alternative cations including Mn(2+), Co(2+), and Zn(2+) can also support catalysis. Although Zn(2+) supports DNA synthesis, it inhibits HIV RT by significantly modifying RT catalysis. Zn(2+) is currently being investigated as a component of novel treatment options against HIV and we wanted to investigate the fidelity of RT with Zn(2+).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25934642 PMCID: PMC4472245 DOI: 10.1186/s12858-015-0041-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Biochem ISSN: 1471-2091 Impact factor: 4.059
Figure 1Time course of HIV RT synthesis on the ~760 nt RNA template used in the PCR-based α-complementation assay. Shown is an autoradiogram with extension of a 20 nt 5′ P-32 end-labeled DNA primer on the RNA template used for round 1 synthesis by HIV RT (see Figure 2). Full extension of the primer resulted in a 199 nt product. A DNA ladder with nt size positions is shown on the left. Concentrations of the cations and dNTPs are indicated above the lanes. Reactions were performed for (1-r) 15 s, 30 s, 1 min, 2 min, 4 min, or 8 min with Mg2+, Mn2+, and Co2+, and 3.25 min, 7.5 min, 15 min, 30 min, and 1 hour with Zn2+. A minus enzyme control (−E) is also shown. Refer to Materials and Methods for details.
Synthesis rate on the RNA template for the PCR-based α-complementation fidelity assay at different cation concentrations
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |
| Mg2+ | 2 (1.6) | 7.4 ± 1.9 | 1.8 ± 0.5 |
| Mn2+ | 0.4 (0.15) | 1.2 ± 0.3 | 0.48 ± 0.09 |
| Co2+ | 0.25 (0.07) | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 0.23 ± 0.05 |
| Zn2+ | 0.4 (0.15) | 0.19 ± 0.10 | 0.03 ± 0.02 |
aThe concentration of free cation is shown in parenthesis. Free cation concentration for Mg2+ was calculated as described in Materials and Methods using the dissociation constant for Mg2+ and ATP. Free concentrations for alternative cations (Mn2+, Co2+, and Zn2+) were approximately using the dissociation constant for Mg2+ and ATP.
bValues are averages from 3 experiments ± standard deviation. Rates were calculated as described in Materials and Methods.
Figure 2PCR-based lacZα-complementation system used to determine the fidelity of HIV RT. (A) An overview of the procedure used to assess polymerase fidelity is presented. RNA is represented by broken lines and DNA is represented by solid line. Primers have arrowheads at the 3′ end. The ~760 nt template RNA used as the initial template for HIV RT RNA-directed DNA synthesis is shown at the top with the 3′ and 5′ ends indicated. The positions of PvuII and EcoRI restriction sites are indicated for reference to the vector. The filled box at the bottom of the figure is the 115 base region of the lacZα gene that was scored in the assay. Details for specific steps are provided under Materials and Methods. (B) Plasmid pBSM13ΔPvuII1146, is shown. Relevant sites on the plasmid are indicated and numbering is based on the parent plasmid (pBSM13+ (Stratagene)). (C) The nt and amino acid sequence for the 115 base region of the lacZα gene that was scored in the assay is shown. Both strands of the DNA plasmid are shown since HIV RT synthesis was performed in both directions (see Figure 2A). A line is drawn above the 92 nts that are in the detectable area for substitution mutations while frameshifts can be detected over the entire 115 nt region. Based on a previous cataloging of mutations in this gene [51], the assay can detect 116 different substitutions (33.6% of the 345 possible substitutions in the 115 nt sequence) and 100% of the frameshift mutations.
Colony mutation frequencies in PCR-based -complementation assay
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| ||
| d1 | 4/1205 | 10/960 | 7/1328 | |
| 3.3 | 10 (6.7) | 5.3 (2.0) | ||
| 2 | 3/1726 | 13/1826 | 5/1315 | 16/1639 |
| 1.7 | 7.1 (5.4) | 3.8 (2.1) | 9.8 (8.1) | |
| 3 | 1/1577 | 13/1899 | 6/2195 | 11/1520 |
| 0.6 | 6.8 (6.2) | 2.7 (2.1) | 7.2 (6.6) | |
| 4 | 7/2942 | 26/3318 | 18/2977 | |
| 2.4 | 7.8 (5.4) | 6.0 (3.6) | ||
| eAvg. ± S.D. | 1.9 ± 1.4 | 7.9 ± 1.4 | 4.5 ± 1.5 | 8.5 ± 1.8 |
| (5.9 ± 0.6) | (2.5 ± 0.8) | (7.4 ± 1.1) | ||
| fP-value | 4.4 x 10−4 | 0.098 | ||
| gRelative fidelity | 1.0 | 2.4 | 0.8 | |
| hTukey HSD | P < 0.01 (Zn2+) | P < 0.01 (Mg2+) | P < 0.01 (Zn2+) | |
| P- N.S. (Co2+) | P < 0.01 (Co2+) | P- N.S. (Mg2+) | ||
aIndependent experiments performed at different times. In typical experiments, 1000–3500 colonies were scored for each condition.
bIn background assays, plasmid pBSM13ΔPVUII (Figure, 1B) was used as a template in PCR reactions to generate the insert that was scored in the assays. Numbers shown are the “colony mutation frequency” (CMF) defined as white + faint blue colonies divided by total colonies. Refer to the Results and Methods sections for details.
cFree cation concentration under each condition was calculated as described in Materials and Methods using the dissociation constant for Mg2+ and ATP.
dNumbers shown on top are: (white + faint blue colonies)/total colonies. The bottom number is the colony mutation frequency (CMF) (see b above) for experiments under the listed condition. The CMF minus the background frequency from column two is in parentheses.
eAverages ± standard deviations from the experiments in the column are shown.
fValues were calculated using a standard Student’s t-test and the background subtracted values from each condition. All values were compared to the 2 mM Mg2+ condition.
gAll values are relative to the 2 mM MgCl2 average CMF-Bkg. value (0.0059). The 0.0059 value was divided by the average CMF-Bkg. value for each condition to determine relative fidelity. Higher numbers indicate greater fidelity.
hIn order to address the effect of comparing multiple sample conditions on statistical significance, ANOVA analysis coupled with a Tukey’s honest significance of difference (Tukey HSD) test were conducted using the background subtracted values from all samples and the calculator available online from Statistica: http://statistica.mooo.com/OneWay_Anova_with_TukeyHSD. The cation in parenthesis is being compared to the one listed in the column. N.S.- Not Significant.
Colony mutant frequencies in plasmid –based -complementation assay
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| d1 | 4/1893 | 11/1395 | 10/1297 | 10/2993 | |||
| 2.1 | 7.9 (5.8) | 7.7 (5.6) | 3.3 (1.2) | ||||
| 2 | 2/1246 | 8/1176 | 7/1067 | 10/1054 | 5/1301 | ||
| 1.6 | 6.8 (5.2) | 6.6 (5.0) | 9.5 (7.9) | 3.8 (2.2) | |||
| 3 | 3/3456 | 10/1755 | 10/2145 | 16/1389 | 14/3799 | ||
| 0.9 | 5.7 (4.8) | 4.7 (3.8) | 12 (11.1) | 3.7 (2.8) | |||
| 4 | 4/1250 | 10/1192 | 11/1257 | 12/1007 | |||
| 3.2 | 8.4 (5.2) | 8.8 (5.6) | 12 (8.8) | ||||
| 5 | 3/3113 | 160/1823 | 14/1324 | 101/1084 | |||
| 0.96 | 88 (87) | 11 (10) | 93 (92) | ||||
| 6 | 7/5866 | 249/1286 | 90/1850 | ||||
| 1.2 | 194 (193) | 49 (48) | |||||
| 7 | 3/2682 | 375/2740 | 119/2503 | ||||
| 1.1 | 137 (136) | 48 (47) | |||||
| eAvg. ± S.D. | 1.6 ± 0.8 | 7.2 ± 1.7 | 7.4 ± 1.8 | 140 ± 53 | 11.1 ± 1.2 | 63 ± 26 | 3.6 ± 0.3 |
| (5.3 ± 0.4) | (5.7 ± 1.6) | (139 ± 53) | (9.5 ± 1.4) | (62 ± 26) | (2.1 ± 0.8) | ||
| fStatistics (see legend) | 0.63 | 0.0034 | 0.0012 | 0.0059 | 0.00097 | ||
| gRelative fidelity | 1 | 0.93 | 0.038 | 0.56 | 0.085 | 2.5 | |
aIndependent experiments performed at different times.
bIn background assays, the gapped plasmid was transformed into the bacteria allowing the bacterial polymerases to fill in the gap. Numbers shown are the “colony mutant frequency” (CMF) defined as white + faint blue colonies divided by total colonies. Refer to the Results and Methods sections for details.
cFree cation concentration under each condition was calculated as described in Materials and Methods using the dissociation constant for Mg2+ and ATP.
dNumbers shown on top are: (white + faint blue colonies)/total colonies. The bottom number is the colony mutant frequency (CMF) (see b above) for experiments under the listed condition. The CMF minus the background frequency from column two is in parentheses.
eAverages ± standard deviations from the experiments in the column are shown. Values in parentheses are after background subtraction.
fP-values shown were calculated using a standard Student’s t-test and the background subtracted values from each condition. All values were compared to the 2 mM MgCl2 condition. In order to address the effect of comparing multiple sample conditions on statistical significance, ANOVA analysis coupled with a Tukey’s honest significance of difference (Tukey HSD) test were conducted using the background subtracted values from samples and the calculator available online from Statistica:http://statistica.mooo.com/OneWay_Anova_with_TukeyHSD. The 6 mM MnCl2 and CoCl2 conditions were excluded from the analysis as their dramatically different magnitudes compared to other values complicates the analysis. Tukey analysis indicated highly significant differences (P < 0.01) for all conditions tested except 2 mM MgCl2 vs. 0.4 mM MnCl2, which was not significant, consistent with the insignificant P value (0.63) from the Student’s t-test.
gAll values are relative to the 2 mM Mg2+ average CMF-Bkg. value (0.0053). The 0.0053 value was divided by the average CMF-Bkg. value for each condition to determine relative fidelity. Higher numbers indicate greater fidelity.
Figure 3DNA sequence analysis from the PCR-based lacZα-complementation fidelity assay. The 115 base region analyzed for mutations is shown. The coding strand for lacZα is shown in the 5-3′ direction (bottom strand in Figure 2C). Numbering is as shown in Figure 2C. Deletions are shown as regular triangles, insertions are shown as downward triangles with the inserted base shown adjacent to the downward triangle, unless it was the same as the base in a nt run, and base substitutions are shown directly above or below the sequence. Substitutions shown correspond to the recovered sequence for the coding strand; however, these mutations could have occurred during synthesis of the non-coding strand as well (i.e. a C to A change shown here could have resulted from a C to A change during synthesis of the coding strand or a G to T during synthesis of the non-coding strand) (see Figure 2). Mutations recovered from HIV RT with 2 mM Mg2±, and mutations from background controls are shown above the sequence as open triangles and normal text or filled triangles and bold italicized text, respectively. Mutations from HIV RT at 0.4 mM Zn2+ are shown below the sequence. Individual sequence clones which had multiple mutations (more than one mutation event) are marked with subscripts adjacent to the mutations. Several clones with deletions (either single or multiple deletions) at positions 181–183, just outside of the scored region were also recovered (not shown). This was the dominant mutation type recovered in background controls (19 out of 24 total sequences) and probably resulted from improper ligation events or damaged plasmid vectors (see [48]).
Figure 4A, B and C. Sequences used in mismatched primer extension and running-start misincorporation assays and examples of analysis. (A) The sequence of the DNA used in each assay type is shown. The underlined nts show the only differences between the two templates. Only one primer was used in the running-start assays and it terminated at the 3′ C nt before the dashes. The four dashes indicate the 4 A nts that must be incorporated before RT incorporates the target nt (denoted by X or Y). (B) Running-start misincorporation of C.T base pair at 2 mM Mg2+ or 0.4 mM Zn2+. Reactions were performed on the primer-template shown in panel A for the indicated time with a final free concentration of 2 mM Mg2+ or 0.4 mM Zn2+ (adjusted according to the total concentration of dNTPs in each reaction using the K value of Mg2+ and ATP). A fixed concentration of dATP = 55 μM was used in all running-start reactions for elongation of the primer to the target site. The concentration of the target nt (dTTP for C.T insertion) in each lane was from l-r: 400, 630, 1380, 2610, and 3660 μM. For other base pair misinsertions noted in the Table 4, the target nt was changed according to the desired misinsertion. (C) Extension of a mismatched primer-template with a C.T 3 terminus, using 2 mM Mg2+ and 0.4 mM Zn2+. Reactions were performed on the primer-template shown in panel A for the indicated time with the same free cation concentration as above. The concentration of the next correct nt (dCTP) in each lane was from l-r: 50, 100, 200, 400, 630, 1200 and 1870 μM. -E lane corresponds to no enzyme added.
Running-start misincorporation assay of various mismatches with Mg or Zn
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||
| hMg2+ | C.G | 2.9 ± 1.1 | 0.68 ± 0.33 | 4.3 ± 1.3 | 1 | ||
| G.C | 1.4 ± 0.26 | 1.2 ± 0.64 | 1.2 ± 0.6 | 1 | |||
| C.T | 0.55 ± 0.14 | 1863 ± 670 | 2.9 (±0.33) x 10−4 | 6.7 (±2.6) x 10−5 | |||
| C.A | 0.50 ± 0.06 | 825 ± 217 | 6.1 (±1.1) x 10−4 | 1.4 (±0.3) x 10−4 | |||
| C.C | 0.09 ± 0.07 | 312 ± 166 | 2.9 (±0.8) x 10−4 | 6.7 (±1.9) x 10−5 | |||
| G.T | 0.36 ± 0.16 | 242 ± 50 | 1.5 (±0.9) x10−3 | 1.3 (±0.8) x10−3 | |||
| G.A | 0.38 ± 0.11 | 1515 ± 85 | 2.5 (±0.6) x 10−4 | 2.1 (±0.5) x 10−4 | |||
| Zn2+ | C.G | 8.2 ± 5.5 | 0.19 ± 0.09 | 43 ± 11 | 1 | ||
| G.C | 5.8 ± 5.1 | 5.1 ± 4.7 | 1.3 ± 0.6 | 1 | |||
| C.T | 0.19 ± 0.07 | 244 ± 102 | 7.8 (±0.97) x 10−4 | 1.8 (±0.8) x 10−5 | 3.7 | 0.028 | |
| C.A | 0.55 ± 0.33 | 518 ± 43 | 1.1 (±0.6) x 10−3 | 2.5 (±1.6) x 10−5 | 5.6 | 0.0023 | |
| C.C | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 224 ± 104 | 2.2 (±1.4) x 10−4 | 5.1 (±5.6) x 10−6 | 13.1 | 0.029 | |
| G.T | 0.2 ± 0.08 | 914 ± 378 | 2.2 (±0.7) x 10−4 | 1.6 (±0.6) x 10−4 | 8.1 | 0.038 | |
| G.A | N.D. | ||||||
aThe extension reactions were carried as described in Materials and Methods using either 2 mM free Mg2+ or 0.4 mM free Zn2+. Free cation concentration was calculated as described in Materials and Methods using the dissociation constant for Mg2+ and ATP. All values are averages from at least 3 experiments ± standard deviation.
bRefer to the running-start sequences in Figure 2. The particular mismatch that was measured after incorporation of a run of A’s over a run of T’s on the template is shown in the column
c V = I /I where I is the sum of band intensities at the target site and beyond, I is the intensity of the band prior to the target band. See Materials and Methods for a description.
dRefers to the Km of the nucleotide being incorporated at the target site (e.g. dGTP for C.G and dATP for C.A).
e f is the ratio of {V /K (mismatch)}/{V /K (match)}.
fFidelity values for misincorporation in Zn2+ are relative to the same mismatch using Mg2+. Determinations were made by dividing the misinsertion ratio in Mg2+ by the ratio in Zn2+. Higher values indicate greater fidelity.
gValues were calculated using a standard Student’s t-test. Misinsertion ratio values from experiments in Zn2+ were compared against the Mg2+ condition for the same misincorporation.
hValues for Mg2+ were taken from (33).
Mismatched primer extension with Mg or Zn
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||
| hMg2+ | C.G | 21.4 ± 2.0 | 0.37 ± 0.13 | 57.8 ± 19.2 | 1 | ||
| G.C | 39.9 ± 14.5 | 0.27 ± 0.13 | 147.8 ± 40.6 | 1 | |||
| C.T | 22.5 ± 2.1 | 396 ± 28 | 5.7 (±0.9) x 10−2 | 9.9 (±1.7) x 10−4 | |||
| C.A | 11.1 ± 2.9 | 445 ± 188 | 2.5 (±0. 57) x 10−2 | 4.3 (±0.94) x 10−4 | |||
| C.C | 0.70 ± 0.29 | 77 ± 14 | 9.1 (±2.2) x 10−3 | 1.6 (±0.38) x 10−4 | |||
| G.T | 18.6 ± 3.3 | 157 ± 44 | 0.12 ± 0.03 | 8.1 (±2.5) x10−4 | |||
| G.A | 0.95 ± 0.04 | 196 ± 50 | 4.8 (±1.6) x 10−3 | 3.2 (±1.0) x 10−5 | |||
| Zn2+ | C.G | 0.62 ± 0.23 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 15.5 ± 5.8 | 1 | 1 | |
| G.C | 0.39 ± 0.10 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 9.8 ± 1.9 | 1 | 1 | ||
| C.T | 2.9 ± 1.0 | 591 ± 63 | 4.9 (±2. 3) x 10−3 | 3.2 (±1.6) x 10−4 | 3.1 | 0.026 | |
| C.A | 3.3 ± 1.0 | 1240 ± 186 | 2.7 (±1.3) x 10−3 | 1.7 (±0.75) x 10−4 | 2.5 | 0.029 | |
| C.C | 0.50 ± 0.14 | 914 ± 457 | 5.4 (±4.6) x 10−4 | 3.5 (±3.4) x 10−5 | 4.6 | 0.023 | |
| G.T | 6.8 ± 1.8 | 1223 ± 568 | 5.6 (±2.8) x 10−3 | 5.7 (±3.2) x 10−4 | 1.4 | 0.375 | |
| G.A | N.D. | ||||||
aThe extension reactions were carried out in either 2 mM fee Mg2+ or 0.4 mM free Zn2+. Free cation concentration was calculated as described in Materials and Methods using the dissociation constant for Mg2+ and ATP. All values are averages from at least 3 experiments ± standard deviation.
bRefer to the mismatch extension sequences in Figure 2. In this assay primers with a matched C.G or a mismatched C.T, C.A, or C.C at the 3′ end were extended on one seqeunce. A second sequence with a matched G.C or mismatched G.T or G.A was also used.
c V is the maximum velocity of extending each primer- template hybrid. See Materials and Methods for a description.
dRefers to the K of the next correct nucleotide being added (i.e. dCTP for C.G, C.T, C.A, and C.C or dGTP for G.C, G.T, and G.A extensions).
e f is the ratio of {V /K (mismatch)}/{V /K (match)}.
fFidelity values for misextension in Zn2+ are relative to the same mismatch using Mg2+. Determinations were made by dividing the standard extension efficiency in Mg2+ by the same parameter in Zn2+. Higher values indicate greater fidelity.
gValues were calculated using a standard Student’s t-test. Standard extension efficiency values from experiments in Zn2+ were compared against the Mg2+condition for the same mismatch.
hValues for Mg2+ were taken from (33).