Literature DB >> 1688852

Base mispair extension kinetics. Comparison of DNA polymerase alpha and reverse transcriptase.

L V Mendelman1, J Petruska, M F Goodman.   

Abstract

A polyacrylamide gel assay is used to measure the kinetics of adding a single deoxyribonucleotide onto either a correctly matched or mismatched primer 3' terminus (on M13 template) for all possible DNA base pairs and mispairs using Drosophila melanogaster DNA polymerase alpha (Pol alpha) and avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase. The reverse transcriptase catalyzes chain extension from transition mispairs (Pur.Pyr and Pyr.Pur, where Pur is purine and Pyr is pyrimidine) more efficiently than polymerase alpha. Reverse transcriptase extends G(primer).T almost 20% as efficiently as it extends A.T, while Pol alpha's G.T extension efficiency is less than 1%. For transversion mispairs (Pur.Pur and Pyr.Pyr), reverse transcriptase extends C.T and T.T with greater efficiency than polymerase alpha, while polymerase alpha is more efficient at extending A.G and G.G mispairs. Reverse transcriptase and polymerase alpha extend the G.G mispair at an efficiency of only 10(-6) and 10(-5), respectively, compared with G.C extension. The extension data for the two polymerases are compared with previously reported nucleotide misinsertion data for the same enzymes (Mendelman, L. V., Boosalis, M. S., Petruska, J., and Goodman, M. F. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 14415-14423). While the results obtained with reverse transcriptase and Pol alpha differ in detail, some general rules are indicated: (a) Pur.Pyr and Pyr.Pur mispairs, especially G.T and T.G, are easy to insert and even easier to extend; (b) Pyr.Pyr mispairs, especially C.C, are difficult to insert and slightly easier to extend; (c) Pur.Pur mispairs, notably G.G, are harder to extend than to insert. The comparison also shows that reverse transcriptase extends almost all mismatches more efficiently than it forms them, G.G being the only mismatch having a significantly lower efficiency of extension than insertion. Polymerase alpha inserts A.A mismatches most efficiently, but extends them inefficiently, thereby reducing the probability that such transversion mutations will occur in vivo. We show theoretically that when mispaired primers compete with properly matched primers for extension by polymerase, the relative velocities of extension depend on the concentration of the next correct dNTP substrate. The extension velocities depart from Michaelis-Menten kinetics by exhibiting positive cooperativity with respect to substrate concentration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1688852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  92 in total

1.  Roles of yeast DNA polymerases delta and zeta and of Rev1 in the bypass of abasic sites.

Authors:  L Haracska; I Unk; R E Johnson; E Johansson; P M Burgers; S Prakash; L Prakash
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Role of DNA polymerase eta in the bypass of a (6-4) TT photoproduct.

Authors:  R E Johnson; L Haracska; S Prakash; L Prakash
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Incoming nucleotide binds to Klenow ternary complex leading to stable physical sequestration of preceding dNTP on DNA.

Authors:  S Ramanathan; K V Chary; B J Rao
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Error-prone DNA repair activity during somatic hypermutation in shark B lymphocytes.

Authors:  Catherine Zhu; Ellen Hsu
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 5.422

5.  Replication past O(6)-methylguanine by yeast and human DNA polymerase eta.

Authors:  L Haracska; S Prakash; L Prakash
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 6.  DNA replication fidelity in Escherichia coli: a multi-DNA polymerase affair.

Authors:  Iwona J Fijalkowska; Roel M Schaaper; Piotr Jonczyk
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 16.408

7.  Distribution of mutations around rearranged heavy-chain antibody variable-region genes.

Authors:  G W Both; L Taylor; J W Pollard; E J Steele
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Impact of Ribonucleotide Backbone on Translesion Synthesis and Repair of 7,8-Dihydro-8-oxoguanine.

Authors:  Akira Sassa; Melike Çağlayan; Yesenia Rodriguez; William A Beard; Samuel H Wilson; Takehiko Nohmi; Masamitsu Honma; Manabu Yasui
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Effects of Escherichia coli dnaE antimutator alleles in a proofreading-deficient mutD5 strain.

Authors:  I J Fijalkowska; R M Schaaper
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Misincorporation of dAMP opposite 2-hydroxyadenine, an oxidative form of adenine.

Authors:  H Kamiya; T Ueda; T Ohgi; A Matsukage; H Kasai
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1995-03-11       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.