Greta S P Mok1, Cobie Y T Ho2, Bang-Hung Yang3,4, Tung-Hsin Wu3. 1. Biomedical Imaging Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Macau, Avenida da Universidade, Taipa, Macau, SAR, China. gretamok@gmail.com. 2. Biomedical Imaging Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Macau, Avenida da Universidade, Taipa, Macau, SAR, China. 3. Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan. 4. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previously, we proposed interpolated averaged CT (IACT) for improved attenuation correction (AC) in thoracic PET/CT. This study aims to evaluate its feasibility and effectiveness on cardiac PET/CT. METHODS: We simulated (18)F-FDG distribution using the XCAT phantom with normal and abnormal cardiac uptake. Average activity and attenuation maps represented static PET and respiration average CT (ACT), respectively, while the attenuation maps of end-inspiration/expiration represented 2 helical CTs (HCT). IACT was obtained by averaging the 2 extreme phases and the interpolated phases generated between them. Later, we recruited 4 patients who were scanned 1 hr post 315-428 MBq (18)F-FDG injection. Simulated and clinical PET sinograms were reconstructed with AC using (1) HCT, (2) IACT, and (3) ACT. Polar plots and the 17-segment plots were analyzed. Two regions-of-interest were drawn on lesion and background area to obtain the intensity ratio (IR). RESULTS: Polar plots of PETIACT-AC were more similar to PETACT-AC in both simulation and clinical data. Artifacts were observed in various segments in PETHCT-AC. IR differences of HCT as compared to the phantom were up to ~20%. CONCLUSIONS: IACT-AC reduced respiratory artifacts and improved PET/CT matching similarly to ACT-AC. It is a promising low-dose alternate of ACT for cardiac PET/CT.
BACKGROUND: Previously, we proposed interpolated averaged CT (IACT) for improved attenuation correction (AC) in thoracic PET/CT. This study aims to evaluate its feasibility and effectiveness on cardiac PET/CT. METHODS: We simulated (18)F-FDG distribution using the XCAT phantom with normal and abnormal cardiac uptake. Average activity and attenuation maps represented static PET and respiration average CT (ACT), respectively, while the attenuation maps of end-inspiration/expiration represented 2 helical CTs (HCT). IACT was obtained by averaging the 2 extreme phases and the interpolated phases generated between them. Later, we recruited 4 patients who were scanned 1 hr post 315-428 MBq (18)F-FDG injection. Simulated and clinical PET sinograms were reconstructed with AC using (1) HCT, (2) IACT, and (3) ACT. Polar plots and the 17-segment plots were analyzed. Two regions-of-interest were drawn on lesion and background area to obtain the intensity ratio (IR). RESULTS: Polar plots of PETIACT-AC were more similar to PETACT-AC in both simulation and clinical data. Artifacts were observed in various segments in PETHCT-AC. IR differences of HCT as compared to the phantom were up to ~20%. CONCLUSIONS: IACT-AC reduced respiratory artifacts and improved PET/CT matching similarly to ACT-AC. It is a promising low-dose alternate of ACT for cardiac PET/CT.
Authors: Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2002 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Tinsu Pan; Osama Mawlawi; Sadek A Nehmeh; Yusuf E Erdi; Dershan Luo; Hui H Liu; Richard Castillo; Radhe Mohan; Zhongxing Liao; H A Macapinlac Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Axel Martinez-Möller; Michael Souvatzoglou; Nassir Navab; Markus Schwaiger; Stephan G Nekolla Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Tinsu Pan; Osama Mawlawi; Dershan Luo; Hui H Liu; Pai-Chun M Chi; Martha V Mar; Gregory Gladish; Mylene Truong; Jeremy Erasmus; Zhongxing Liao; H A Macapinlac Journal: Med Phys Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Adam M Alessio; Steve Kohlmyer; Kelley Branch; Grace Chen; James Caldwell; Paul Kinahan Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Timothy M Bateman; Gary V Heller; A Iain McGhie; John D Friedman; James A Case; Jan R Bryngelson; Ginger K Hertenstein; Kelly L Moutray; Kimberly Reid; S James Cullom Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2006 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Nicolas A Karakatsanis; Ronan Abgral; Maria Giovanna Trivieri; Marc R Dweck; Philip M Robson; Claudia Calcagno; Gilles Boeykens; Max L Senders; Willem J M Mulder; Charalampos Tsoumpas; Zahi A Fayad Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2019-10-30 Impact factor: 5.952