Literature DB >> 25931624

Self-reported use of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits to purchase soda in a public health center population: Los Angeles County, California, 2012.

Noel Barragan1, Lauren Gase1, Rebecca Butler1, Lisa Smith2, Paul Simon1, Tony Kuo1.   

Abstract

To better inform local program planning for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health used self-reported data from a public health center population to examine the prevalence of benefits used to purchase soda. We performed statistical analyses, including multivariable regression modeling, using data from a local health and nutrition examination survey. The survey response rate was 69% (n=1,503). More than one-third of survey participants reported receiving, or living in a household where someone receives, nutrition assistance benefits. When asked, 33% (n=170) reported using these benefits to purchase soda "sometimes" and 18% (n=91) reported "often" or "always," suggesting that the use of program benefits to purchase soda was not uncommon in this subpopulation. These findings have meaningful policy and planning implications, as they contribute to ongoing dialogue about strategies for optimizing nutrition among SNAP recipients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25931624      PMCID: PMC4388218          DOI: 10.1177/003335491513000307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  6 in total

1.  Who is leading the change?. U.S. dietary quality comparison between 1965 and 1996.

Authors:  Barry M Popkin; Claire Zizza; Anna Maria Siega-Riz
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, soda, and USDA policy: who benefits?

Authors:  Kelly D Brownell; David S Ludwig
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Using the Food Stamp Program and other methods to promote healthy diets for low-income consumers.

Authors:  Jonathan D Shenkin; Michael F Jacobson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Impact and ethics of excluding sweetened beverages from the SNAP program.

Authors:  Anne Barnhill
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Evaluating equity critiques in food policy: the case of sugar-sweetened beverages.

Authors:  Anne Barnhill; Katherine F King
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.718

6.  Grocery store beverage choices by participants in federal food assistance and nutrition programs.

Authors:  Tatiana Andreyeva; Joerg Luedicke; Kathryn E Henderson; Amanda S Tripp
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.043

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.