Literature DB >> 12818303

Who is leading the change?. U.S. dietary quality comparison between 1965 and 1996.

Barry M Popkin1, Claire Zizza, Anna Maria Siega-Riz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many studies have examined rapidly changing trends in U.S. dietary intake, but not as they correspond to other health inequalities among black and white Americans. The purpose of this study was to explore 30-year trends in diet quality and to examine whether income or education is the key socioeconomic factor linked with these shifts.
METHODS: The 1965 Nationwide Food Consumption Survey and the 1994-1996 Continuing Survey of Food Intake by Individuals were used and included, respectively, 6476 and 9241 respondents who were aged > or =18 years. The Revised Diet Quality Index (DQI-R), an instrument that provides a summary assessment of a diet's overall healthfulness, was also used.
RESULTS: Between 1965 and 1996, improvements were found in both the overall DQI-R and its components across all education levels, with the exception of calcium intake. Conversely, improvements linked with income effects were inconsistent and less clear. In 1965, the effect of college attendance resulted in a 1.8 point higher DQI-R, higher calcium intake, and increased servings of fruits and vegetables. In 1994-1996, there were consistently improved diets for the overall DQI-R and its components, particularly among college attendees.
CONCLUSIONS: Diet quality has improved across both race and socioeconomic status groupings between 1965 and 1994-1996; however, education provides a much clearer differentiation. Education efforts must be emphasized to eliminate disadvantages in diet quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12818303     DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(03)00099-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  25 in total

1.  The association of educational attainment and SBP among older community-living adults: the Maintenance of Balance, Independent Living, Intellect and Zest in the Elderly (MOBILIZE) Boston Study.

Authors:  Dan K Kiely; Alden L Gross; Dae H Kim; Lewis A Lipsitz
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.844

2.  Informing cancer prevention strategies for African Americans: the relationship of African American acculturation to fruit, vegetable, and fat intake.

Authors:  Jamy D Ard; Celette Sugg Skinner; Chuhe Chen; Mikel Aickin; Laura P Svetkey
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2005-06

3.  An ecological approach to understanding contributions to disparities in diabetes prevention and care.

Authors:  Debra Haire-Joshu; Chris Fleming
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.810

4.  Self-reported use of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits to purchase soda in a public health center population: Los Angeles County, California, 2012.

Authors:  Noel Barragan; Lauren Gase; Rebecca Butler; Lisa Smith; Paul Simon; Tony Kuo
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Effect of race and predictors of socioeconomic status on diet quality in the HANDLS Study sample.

Authors:  Sarah Raffensperger; Marie Fanelli Kuczmarski; Lawrence Hotchkiss; Nancy Cotugna; Michele K Evans; Alan B Zonderman
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.798

6.  Dietary Factors and Cognitive Function in Poor Urban Settings.

Authors:  Regina S Wright; Constance Gerassimakis; Desirée Bygrave; Shari R Waldstein
Journal:  Curr Nutr Rep       Date:  2017-02-15

7.  Understanding socioeconomic and racial/ethnic status disparities in diet, exercise, and weight: underlying contextual factors and pathways.

Authors:  Penny Gordon-Larsen; Barry Popkin
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2011-12

8.  Perfluorinated compounds, polychlorinated biphenyls, and organochlorine pesticide contamination in composite food samples from Dallas, Texas, USA.

Authors:  Arnold Schecter; Justin Colacino; Darrah Haffner; Keyur Patel; Matthias Opel; Olaf Päpke; Linda Birnbaum
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Trends in dietary quality among adults in the United States, 1999 through 2010.

Authors:  Dong D Wang; Cindy W Leung; Yanping Li; Eric L Ding; Stephanie E Chiuve; Frank B Hu; Walter C Willett
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 21.873

10.  Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and hexabromocyclodecane (HBCD) in composite U.S. food samples.

Authors:  Arnold Schecter; Darrah Haffner; Justin Colacino; Keyur Patel; Olaf Päpke; Matthias Opel; Linda Birnbaum
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.