Literature DB >> 22992359

Grocery store beverage choices by participants in federal food assistance and nutrition programs.

Tatiana Andreyeva1, Joerg Luedicke, Kathryn E Henderson, Amanda S Tripp.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sugar-sweetened beverages are a target for reduction in the 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Concerns have been raised about sugar-sweetened beverages purchased with Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits.
PURPOSE: This paper describes purchases of non-alcoholic refreshment beverages among participants in the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) and SNAP.
METHODS: Grocery store scanner data from a regional supermarket chain were used to assess refreshment beverage purchases of 39,172 households in January-June 2011. The sample consisted of families with a history of WIC participation in 2009-2011; about half also participated in SNAP. Beverage spending and volume purchased were compared for WIC sampled households either using SNAP benefits (SNAP) or not (WIC-only). Analyses were completed in 2012.
RESULTS: Refreshment beverages were a significant contributor to expenditure on groceries by SNAP and WIC households. Sugar-sweetened beverages accounted for 58% of refreshment beverage purchases made by SNAP households and 48% of purchases by WIC-only households. Soft drinks were purchased most by all households. Fruit-based beverages were mainly 100% juice for WIC-only households and sugary fruit drinks for SNAP households. SNAP benefits paid for 72% of the sugar-sweetened beverage purchases made by SNAP households. Nationwide, SNAP was estimated to pay at least $1.7 to $2.1 billion annually for sugar-sweetened beverages purchased in grocery stores.
CONCLUSIONS: Considerable amounts of sugar-sweetened beverages are purchased by households participating in WIC and SNAP. The SNAP program pays for most of the sugar-sweetened beverage purchases among SNAP households. The upcoming SNAP reauthorization could be a good time to reconsider the program priorities to align public funds with public health.
Copyright © 2012 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22992359     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.06.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  34 in total

1.  Implications of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Tax Exemption on Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes.

Authors:  Jennifer L Pomeranz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  The Role of SNAP in Home Food Availability and Dietary Intake among WIC Participants Facing Unstable Housing.

Authors:  Meg Bruening; Darya McClain; Michael Moramarco; Elizabeth Reifsnider
Journal:  Public Health Nurs       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 1.462

3.  Physical changes in the home environment to reduce television viewing and sugar-sweetened beverage consumption among 5- to 12-year-old children: a randomized pilot study.

Authors:  S A French; N E Sherwood; M M JaKa; J L Haapala; C B Ebbeling; D S Ludwig
Journal:  Pediatr Obes       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 4.000

4.  Rewarding healthy food choices in SNAP: behavioral economic applications.

Authors:  Michael R Richards; Jody L Sindelar
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.911

5.  American adults eligible for the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program consume more sugary beverages than ineligible adults.

Authors:  Sara N Bleich; Seanna Vine; Julia A Wolfson
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Self-reported use of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits to purchase soda in a public health center population: Los Angeles County, California, 2012.

Authors:  Noel Barragan; Lauren Gase; Rebecca Butler; Lisa Smith; Paul Simon; Tony Kuo
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  Reducing sugary drink consumption: New York City's approach.

Authors:  Susan M Kansagra; Maura O Kennelly; Cathy A Nonas; Christine J Curtis; Gretchen Van Wye; Andrew Goodman; Thomas A Farley
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 8.  Economics and obesity policy.

Authors:  J L Lusk
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 5.095

9.  Nutritional profile of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program household food and beverage purchases.

Authors:  Anna H Grummon; Lindsey Smith Taillie
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 7.045

10.  Impact of Food Assistance Programs on Obesity in Mothers and Children: A Prospective Cohort Study in Peru.

Authors:  Rodrigo M Carrillo-Larco; J Jaime Miranda; Antonio Bernabé-Ortiz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.