Literature DB >> 2592101

Sliding hip screws: modes of failure.

A H Simpson1, K Varty, C A Dodd.   

Abstract

The modes of failure of the sliding hip screw devices were investigated by reviewing 223 cases. There were 35 mechanical failures. Two of these occurred when the components separated in highly comminuted fractures. The use of the locking screw is recommended to prevent this. The other 33 occurred when the device had lost its sliding action. The reasons for this included jamming, insufficient slide being available and additional fixation. To reduce the complication rate it is recommended that any additional fixation (such as cerclage wires) should be used with care to ensure that they do not block the barrel. For patients with short femoral necks, a shorter barrelled version of the device should be used as it would have a greater sliding capacity. Guidelines for its use are given.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2592101     DOI: 10.1016/0020-1383(89)90120-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  32 in total

1.  [Navigated osteosynthesis of the proximal femur. An experimental study].

Authors:  T Hüfner; M Kfuri; D Kendoff; M Richter; J Geerling; C Krettek
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Analysis of the micro-migration of sliding hip screws by using point-based registration.

Authors:  Patrik Raudaschl; Karl Fritscher; Tobias Roth; Christian Kammerlander; Rainer Schubert
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Cephalomedullary fixation for intertrochanteric fractures: an operative technical tip.

Authors:  Lin Jin; Liping Zhang; Zhiyong Hou; Wei Chen; Pengcheng Wang; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-03-22

4.  Correlation between femoral offset loss and dynamic hip screw cut-out complications after pertrochanteric fractures: a case-control study.

Authors:  Baptiste Boukebous; Pascal Guillon; Eric Vandenbussche; Marc Antoine Rousseau
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-04-27

5.  Is tip apex distance as important as we think? A biomechanical study examining optimal lag screw placement.

Authors:  Patrick Kane; Bryan Vopat; Wendell Heard; Nikhil Thakur; David Paller; Sarath Koruprolu; Christopher Born
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  [Evaluation of a 2D fluoroscopy-based navigation system for insertion of femoral neck screws. An experimental study].

Authors:  M C Müller; P Belei; M de la Fuente; M Strake; K Kabir; O Weber; C Burger; K Radermacher; D C Wirtz
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  Use of an expanded lateral hip view to assist guidewire placement during dynamic hip screw fixation.

Authors:  A G Marsh; A Ker
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Intramedullary fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures: a comparison of two implant designs.

Authors:  Nicolas E Efstathopoulos; Vassilios S Nikolaou; John T Lazarettos
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Primary hemiarthroplasty for unstable osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly: A retrospective case series.

Authors:  Kh Sancheti; Pk Sancheti; Ak Shyam; S Patil; Q Dhariwal; R Joshi
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Risk factors in cutout of sliding hip screw in intertrochanteric fractures: an evaluation of 937 patients.

Authors:  Kuang-Kai Hsueh; Chi-Kuang Fang; Chuan-Mu Chen; Yu-Ping Su; Heng-Fei Wu; Fang-Yao Chiu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.