Literature DB >> 24224994

Identification of vowel length, word stress, and compound words and phrases by postlingually deafened cochlear implant listeners.

David Morris1, Lennart Magnusson, Andrew Faulkner, Radoslava Jönsson, Holger Juul.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The accurate perception of prosody assists a listener in deriving meaning from natural speech. Few studies have addressed the ability of cochlear implant (CI) listeners to perceive the brief duration prosodic cues involved in contrastive vowel length, word stress, and compound word and phrase identification.
PURPOSE: To compare performance in the perception of brief duration prosodic contrasts by CI participants and a control group of normal hearing participants. This study investigated the ability to perceive these cues in quiet and noise conditions, and to identify auditory perceptual factors that might predict prosodic perception in the CI group. Prosodic perception was studied both in noise and quiet because noise is a pervasive feature of everyday environments. RESEARCH
DESIGN: A quasi-experimental correlation design was employed. STUDY SAMPLE: Twenty-one CI recipients participated along with a control group of 10 normal hearing participants. All CI participants were unilaterally implanted adults who had considerable experience with oral language prior to implantation. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Speech identification testing measured the participants' ability to identify word stress, vowel length, and compound words or phrases all of which were presented with minimal-pair response choices. Tests were performed in quiet and in speech-spectrum shaped noise at a 10 dB signal-to-noise ratio. Also, discrimination thresholds for four acoustic properties of a synthetic vowel were measured as possible predictors of prosodic perception. Testing was carried out during one session, and participants used their clinically assigned speech processors.
RESULTS: The CI group could not identify brief prosodic cues as well as the control group, and their performance decreased significantly in the noise condition. Regression analysis showed that the discrimination of intensity predicted performance on the prosodic tasks. The performance decline measured with the older participants meant that age also emerged as a predictor.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a portrayal of CI recipients' ability to perceive brief prosodic cues. This is of interest in the preparation of rehabilitation materials used in training and in developing realistic expectations for potential CI candidates. American Academy of Audiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24224994     DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.24.9.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  7 in total

1.  Amplitude fluctuations in a masker influence lexical segmentation in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Trevor T Perry; Bomjun J Kwon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Low-frequency fine-structure cues allow for the online use of lexical stress during spoken-word recognition in spectrally degraded speech.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Alexandra Jesse
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The role of continuous low-frequency harmonicity cues for interrupted speech perception in bimodal hearing.

Authors:  Soo Hee Oh; Gail S Donaldson; Ying-Yee Kong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Prosodic Boundary Effects on Syntactic Disambiguation in Children With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Talita Fortunato-Tavares; Richard G Schwartz; Klara Marton; Claudia F de Andrade; Derek Houston
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Using prosody to infer discourse prominence in cochlear-implant users and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Yi Ting Huang; Rochelle S Newman; Allison Catalano; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2017-06-01

6.  Children's Neural Sensitivity to Prosodic Features of Natural Speech and Its Significance to Speech Development in Cochlear Implanted Children.

Authors:  Yuebo Chen; Qinqin Luo; Maojin Liang; Leyan Gao; Jingwen Yang; Ruiyan Feng; Jiahao Liu; Guoxin Qiu; Yi Li; Yiqing Zheng; Shuo Lu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 5.152

7.  Accuracy and cue use in word segmentation for cochlear-implant listeners and normal-hearing listeners presented vocoded speech.

Authors:  Christopher C Heffner; Brittany N Jaekel; Rochelle S Newman; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 2.482

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.