BACKGROUND: Cardiac MRI is routinely performed for quantification of shunt flow in patients with anomalous pulmonary veins, but can be technically-challenging to perform. Four-dimensional phase-contrast (4D-PC) MRI has potential to simplify this exam. We sought to determine whether 4D-PC may be a viable clinical alternative to conventional 2D phase-contrast MR imaging. METHODS: With institutional review board approval and HIPAA-compliance, we retrospectively identified all patients with anomalous pulmonary veins who underwent cardiac MRI at either 1.5 Tesla (T) or 3T with parallel-imaging compressed-sensing (PI-CS) 4D-PC between April, 2011 and October, 2013. A total of 15 exams were included (10 male, 5 female). Algorithms for interactive streamline visualization were developed and integrated into in-house software. Blood flow was measured at the valves, pulmonary arteries and veins, cavae, and any associated shunts. Pulmonary veins were mapped to their receiving atrial chamber with streamlines. The intraobserver, interobserver, internal consistency of flow measurements, and consistency with conventional MRI were then evaluated with Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: Triplicate measurements of blood flow from 4D-PC were highly consistent, particularly at the aortic and pulmonary valves (cv 2-3%). Flow measurements were reproducible by a second observer (ρ = 0.986-0.999). Direct measurements of shunt volume from anomalous veins and intracardiac shunts matched indirect estimates from the outflow valves (ρ = 0.966). Measurements of shunt fraction using 4D-PC using any approach were more consistent with ventricular volumetric displacements than conventional 2D-PC (ρ = 0.972-0.991 versus 0.929). CONCLUSION: Shunt flow may be reliably quantified with 4D-PC MRI, either indirectly or with detailed delineation of flow from multiple shunts. The 4D-PC may be a more accurate alternative to conventional MRI.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac MRI is routinely performed for quantification of shunt flow in patients with anomalous pulmonary veins, but can be technically-challenging to perform. Four-dimensional phase-contrast (4D-PC) MRI has potential to simplify this exam. We sought to determine whether 4D-PC may be a viable clinical alternative to conventional 2D phase-contrast MR imaging. METHODS: With institutional review board approval and HIPAA-compliance, we retrospectively identified all patients with anomalous pulmonary veins who underwent cardiac MRI at either 1.5 Tesla (T) or 3T with parallel-imaging compressed-sensing (PI-CS) 4D-PC between April, 2011 and October, 2013. A total of 15 exams were included (10 male, 5 female). Algorithms for interactive streamline visualization were developed and integrated into in-house software. Blood flow was measured at the valves, pulmonary arteries and veins, cavae, and any associated shunts. Pulmonary veins were mapped to their receiving atrial chamber with streamlines. The intraobserver, interobserver, internal consistency of flow measurements, and consistency with conventional MRI were then evaluated with Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: Triplicate measurements of blood flow from 4D-PC were highly consistent, particularly at the aortic and pulmonary valves (cv 2-3%). Flow measurements were reproducible by a second observer (ρ = 0.986-0.999). Direct measurements of shunt volume from anomalous veins and intracardiac shunts matched indirect estimates from the outflow valves (ρ = 0.966). Measurements of shunt fraction using 4D-PC using any approach were more consistent with ventricular volumetric displacements than conventional 2D-PC (ρ = 0.972-0.991 versus 0.929). CONCLUSION: Shunt flow may be reliably quantified with 4D-PC MRI, either indirectly or with detailed delineation of flow from multiple shunts. The 4D-PC may be a more accurate alternative to conventional MRI.
Authors: Mark Murphy; Marcus Alley; James Demmel; Kurt Keutzer; Shreyas Vasanawala; Michael Lustig Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2012-02-15 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: P G Walker; G B Cranney; M B Scheidegger; G Waseleski; G M Pohost; A P Yoganathan Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 1993 May-Jun Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Albert Hsiao; Marcus T Alley; Payam Massaband; Robert J Herfkens; Frandics P Chan; Shreyas S Vasanawala Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2011-01-11
Authors: Eugénie Marie-Christine Riesenkampff; Boris Schmitt; Bernhard Schnackenburg; Michael Huebler; Vladimir Alexi-Meskishvili; Roland Hetzer; Felix Berger; Titus Kuehne Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2009-01-30 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Michael J Horowitz; Daniel F Kupsky; Howaida G El-Said; Laith Alshawabkeh; Seth J Kligerman; Albert Hsiao Journal: Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging Date: 2021-04-01
Authors: Allard T van den Hoven; Sultan Yilmazer; Raluca G Chelu; Roderick W J van Grootel; Savine C S Minderhoud; Lidia R Bons; An M van Berendoncks; Anthonie L Duijnhouwer; Hans-Marc J Siebelink; Annemien E van den Bosch; Ricardo P J Budde; Jolien W Roos-Hesselink; Alexander Hirsch Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2020-05-25 Impact factor: 2.357