| Literature DB >> 25906115 |
Wenjun Jiang1, Peng Liang1, Buying Wang2, Jianhuo Fang3, Jidong Lang3, Geng Tian3, Jingkun Jiang2, Ting F Zhu1.
Abstract
Metagenomic sequencing has been widely used for the study of microbial communities from various environments such as soil, ocean, sediment and fresh water. Nonetheless, metagenomic sequencing of microbial communities in the air remains technically challenging, partly owing to the limited mass of collectable atmospheric particulate matter and the low biological content it contains. Here we present an optimized protocol for extracting up to tens of nanograms of airborne microbial genomic DNA from collected particulate matter. With an improved sequencing library preparation protocol, this quantity is sufficient for downstream applications, such as metagenomic sequencing for sampling various genes from the airborne microbial community. The described protocol takes ∼12 h of bench time over 2-3 d, and it can be performed with standard molecular biology equipment in the laboratory. A modified version of this protocol may also be used for genomic DNA extraction from other environmental samples of limited mass or low biological content.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25906115 PMCID: PMC7086576 DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2015.046
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Protoc ISSN: 1750-2799 Impact factor: 13.491
Figure 1Workflow for particulate matter sample pretreatment.
After sample collection (Steps 1–5), the sample pretreatment workflow includes cutting and rolling the quartz filter containing the collected particulate matter (Step 8), buffer wash (Step 9), PES filter recollection (Steps 10–11) and shredding the PES filter into small pieces (Step 12) before the subsequent cell lysis and DNA extraction steps (Steps 13–25).
Figure 2Experimental setup for particulate matter collection and sample pretreatment.
(a–c) Setup of a VFC high-volume air sampler (Step 4) (a), with a clean PM2.5 inlet gasket (b) and a gasket after several days of particulate matter collection (c). (d) A Tissuquartz filter after 23 h of particulate matter collection. (e,f) A Tissuquartz filter is cut into four equal-sized pieces (Step 8) (e), before being rolled and inserted into 50-ml Falcon tubes filled with sterilized 1× PBS buffer, and then pelleted at 4 °C by low-speed centrifugation at 200g for 3 h (Step 9) (f). (g) The setup for re-filtration of the resuspension using a magnetic filter funnel (Step 10). (h) The re-collected sample on a 0.2-μm Supor 200 PES membrane disc filter (Step 11).
DNA extracted by different pretreatment, extraction and purification methods.
| Sample date | Sample type | Filter size | Net weight (mg) | Volume (ìl) | Conc. (ng/ìl) | Quant. (ng) | Extraction methods used |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012.12.01 | PM2.5 | 1.5 | 97 | 50 | 0.195 | 9.75 | PowerSoil, AMPure XP beads |
| 2012.12.03 | PM10 | 1/4 | 462 | 50 | 0.632 | 31.6 | PowerSoil, AMPure XP beads |
| 2012.12.03 | PM10 | 1/4 | 462 | 50 | 0.382 | 19.1 | PowerMax, AMPure XP beads |
| 2012.12.03 | PM10 | 1/4 | 462 | 50 | 0.198 | 9.9 | PowerSoil, column |
| 2012.12.03 | PM10 | 1/4 | 462 | 50 | 0.073 | 3.65 | PowerMax, column |
The PowerSoil kit was used to extract DNA that had been pretreated according to this protocol; the PowerMax kit was used to extract DNA from samples without pretreatment. AMPure XP beads or columns were the two different methods of DNA purification tested.
Figure 3Quality assessment of extracted genomic DNA and validation of the quality of prepared sequencing libraries.
(a) qPCR results from genomic DNA samples extracted as described in Table 1 using 16S rRNA gene universal primers (Step 25). PM10-pretreated beads: DNA extracted from pretreated PM10 sample (using the MO-BIO PowerSoil kit) and purified using AMPure XP beads; PM10 without (w/o) pretreatment beads: DNA extracted from PM10 sample by shredding the quartz filter without pretreatment (using the MO-BIO PowerMax kit) and purified using AMPure XP beads; PM10-pretreated column: DNA extracted from pretreated PM10 sample (using the MO-BIO PowerSoil kit) and purified using traditional column purification; PM10 w/o pretreatment column: DNA extracted from PM10 sample by shredding the quartz filter without pretreatment (using the MO-BIO PowerMax kit) and purified using traditional column purification; PM2.5 pretreated beads: DNA extracted from pretreated PM2.5 sample (using the MO-BIO PowerSoil kit) and purified using AMPure XP beads. qPCR of the above five samples resulted in successful 16S rRNA gene amplification, whereas the negative control did not. Amplification curves with lower Ct values suggest the presence of more bacterial DNA in the extracted genomic DNA and thus better sample quality. The qPCR data (color-coded and ranked top-down from the lowest Ct to the highest), together with the DNA concentration data presented in Table 1, suggest that the method of using pretreatment with bead purification provides higher DNA yield than all the other methods tested above. The addition of the pretreatment step improves the yield of DNA extraction, and using beads for DNA purification is more effective than using column. (b–d) Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer analysis of six examples of prepared good-quality sequencing libraries (Step 34), including those of four PM2.5 samples and two PM10 samples (all DNA samples were extracted using the pretreated beads method). (b) Electrophoresis of the six libraries: a single, smeary band at 500–800 bp suggests good library quality (the green and purple bands correspond to Bioanalyzer-called lower and upper markers, respectively). (c,d) Electropherograms of two of the libraries (PM2.5-1 and PM10-1, as shown in b) with 15-bp and 1,500-bp markers; a single, wide peak at 500–800 bp suggests good library quality. a.u., arbitrary units; FU, fluorescence units.
Troubleshooting table.
| Step | Problem | Possible reason | Solution |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | Collected PM2.5 mass is equal to or higher than collected PM10 mass | The PM2.5 inlet gasket is not cleaned in time, which leads to an increase of the inlet cutoff size and large particle bounce | We recommend cleaning the PM2.5 inlet gasket every day or every 2 d, especially for sampling particulate matter at locations with high mass concentration |
| There is an abnormal mass of the collected PM2.5 and PM10 samples | There may have been a precision balance malfunction, or sampler flow rates are different from the nominal flow rate (1.13 m3/min) | Recalibrate and check whether the precision balance is functioning properly. Calibrate the sampler flow rate at least once per month | |
| 11 | Failure to filter the buffer suspension through the PES filter | There are too many quartz fibers in the buffer suspension, which become trapped on the PES filter during suction filtration | We recommend 200 |
| 25, 34 | Reduced DNA recovery efficiency | Overdrying the AMPure XP beads | We recommend air-drying the beads at room temperature for 5 min |
| 25 | No or too little extracted genomic DNA | Insufficient input sample, ineffective sample pretreatment or ineffective DNA extraction | We recommend checking the net weight of the input particulate matter sample, making sure that the sample pretreatment steps are carried out effectively, and ensuring that the steps of the DNA extraction are carried out carefully |
| 34 | Low-quality sequencing library as a result of adapter contamination | Ineffective removal of adapter sequences | Use AMPure XP beads to purify the library again |
| Reagent | Volume (ìl) |
|---|---|
| Annealing buffer for DNA oligos (5×) | 20 |
| Illumina adapter forward primer (50 ìm) | 20 |
| Illumina adapter reverse primer (50 ìm) | 20 |
| Ultrapure water | 40 |
| Total | 100 |
| Temperature | Time | |
|---|---|---|
| Denature | 95 °C | 2 min |
| Anneal | 95 °C to 25 °C, 0.0125 °C/s | ∼90 min |
| Hold | 4 °C | ∞ |
| Reagent | Volume (ìl) |
|---|---|
| LightCycler 480 SYBR Green I master mix | 10 |
| 515F primer (10 μM) | 0.3 |
| 806R primer (10 μM) | 0.3 |
| Template | 1 |
| ddH2O | 8.4 |
| Total | 20 |
| Cycles | Temperature (°C) | Time | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preincubation | 1 | 95 | 5 min |
| Amplification | 60 | 95 | 10 s |
| 50 | 20 s | ||
| 72 | 30 s | ||
| Melting curve | 1 | 95 | 5 s |
| 65 | 1 min | ||
| 97 | (acquisition) | ||
| Cooling | 1 | 40 | 10 s |
| Peak incident power (W) | 175 |
|---|---|
| Duty factor | 5% |
| Cycles per burst | 200 |
| Treatment time (s) | 35 |
| Temperature (°C) | 7 |
| Water level-S220 | 12 |
| Water level-E220 | 6 |
| Sample volume (ìl) | 50 |
| E220-intensifier (pn500141) | Yes |
| Reagent | Volume (ìl) |
|---|---|
| Fragmented DNA | 42.5 |
| NEBNext End Repair Reaction Buffer (10×) | 5 |
| NEBNext End Repair Enzyme Mix | 2.5 |
| Total | 50 |
| Reagent | Volume (ìl) |
|---|---|
| End-repaired DNA | 42 |
| NEBNext dA-Tailing Reaction Buffer (10×) | 5 |
| Klenow fragment (3'→5' exo-) | 3 |
| Total | 50 |
| Reagent | Volume (ìl) |
|---|---|
| DNA with added dA tail | 21 |
| 2× Quick Ligation Buffer | 25 |
| Quick T4 DNA ligase | 3 |
| Illumina adapter (10 μM) | 1 |
| Total | 50 |
| Reagent | Volume (ìl) |
|---|---|
| DNA with Illumina adapters | 23 |
| Q5 high-fidelity 2× master mix | 25 |
| Illumina universal primer (10 μM) | 1 |
| Illumina index primer (10 μM) | 1 |
| Total | 50 |
| Cycles | Temperature (°C) | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 98 | 30 s |
| 12 | 98 | 10 s |
| 65 | 30 s | |
| 72 | 50 s | |
| 1 | 72 | 5 min |
| 1 | 4 | ∞ |