| Literature DB >> 27990136 |
Xin-Lei Gao1, Ming-Fei Shao1, Yi-Sheng Xu2, Yi Luo3, Kai Zhang1, Feng Ouyang1, Ji Li1.
Abstract
Recovering microorganisms from environmental samples is a crucial primary step for understanding microbial communities using molecular ecological approaches. It is often challenging to harvest microorganisms both efficiently and unselectively, guaranteeing a similar microbial composition between original and separated biomasses. A magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) based method was developed to effectively separate microbial biomass from glass fiber pulp entrapped bacteria. Buffering pH and nanoparticle silica encapsulation significantly affected both biomass recovery and microbial selectivity. Under optimized conditions (using citric acid coated Fe3O4, buffering pH = 2.2), the method was applied in the pretreatment of total suspended particle sampler collected bioaerosols, the effective volume for DNA extraction was increased 10-folds, and the overall method detection limit of microbial contaminants in bioaerosols significantly decreased. A consistent recovery of the majority of airborne bacterial populations was demonstrated by in-depth comparison of microbial composition using 16S rRNA gene high-throughput sequencing. Surface charge was shown as the deciding factor for the interaction between MNPs and microorganisms, which helps developing materials with high microbial selectivity. To our knowledge, this study is the first report using MNPs to separate diverse microbial community unselectively from a complex environmental matrix. The technique is convenient and sensitive, as well as feasible to apply in monitoring of microbial transport and other related fields.Entities:
Keywords: adsorption; bioaerosols; glass fiber filter; magnetic nanoparticle; microbial community; surface charge
Year: 2016 PMID: 27990136 PMCID: PMC5130997 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01891
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Co-linearity analysis showing the microbial composition similarities between magnetic nanoparticle (MNP) separated biomass and control methods.
| Samples (Treatments) | Angles between two typical treatment (degrees) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cutoff = 0.03 level | Cutoff = 0.06 level | |||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| 1 | 0 | 16.9 | 67.2 | 70.5 | 78.3 | 0 | 16.5 | 59.5 | 68.2 | 77.2 |
| 2 | 0 | 62.8 | 72.2 | 79.0 | 0 | 57.7 | 70.2 | 78.2 | ||
| 3 | 0 | 75.8 | 79.4 | 0 | 72.1 | 79.3 | ||||
| 4 | 0 | 20.7 | 0 | 17.8 | ||||||
| 5 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
Co-linearity analysis of typical sample pairs showing their microbial composition similarities.
| Sample pairs | Angles between sample pairs (degrees) | |
|---|---|---|
| Cutoff = 0.03 | Cutoff = 0.06 | |
| Acid MNPs separation and control method (ambient air sample 100 m outside) | 24.5 | 18.8 |
| Acid MNPs separation and control method (ambient air sample 400 m outside) | 19.4 | 16.5 |
| The same DNA with different PCR amplifications | 22.3 | 16.7 |
| The same sample with different DNA extraction and PCR amplification | 14.8 | 14.3 |
| The same media, different sampling points (air sampled at 100 and 400 m outside of the wet market) | 65.8 | 60.7 |
| Different media (ground dust and coastal water) | 70.7 | 68.3 |
| Different media (ground dust and indoor air) | 78.5 | 76.6 |
| Different media (coastal water and air) | 82.9 | 81.6 |
Improved detection sensitivity of microbial contaminants by the application of MNP assisted biomass separation.
| Locations | Volume based DNA yield (ng per m3) | Total DNA yield (ng per sample) | Gene concentration (copies per m3) | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16S rRNA gene | Functional gene (e.g., ARGs) | ||||
| Polluted air | |||||
| Live poultry trade market | ∼20.0 | 4.93E+03 | 2.47E+07 | 3.13E+07 ( | This study |
| Concentrated animal feeding operations | ∼0.16∗ | 2.78E-01 | 8.20E+04 | 5.14E+03 ( | |
| Cattle feed yards | ∼1.5∗ | 4.46E+01 | 1.90E+06 | 3.80E+06 ( | |
| Clean air | |||||
| Urban air (streets, Shenzhen, China) | ∼0.2 | 2.94E+02 | 2.57E+05 | 7.39E+02 ( | This study |
| Urban air (campus, Singapore) | ∼0.15 | 3.46E+00 | 1.90E+05∗ | – | |
| Clinic indoor air | ∼0.0001∗ | 4.96E-04 | 1.17E+02 | 1.02E+01 ( | |