Literature DB >> 25901082

Quantification of Nonenhancing Tumor Burden in Gliomas Using Effective T2 Maps Derived from Dual-Echo Turbo Spin-Echo MRI.

Benjamin M Ellingson1, Albert Lai2, Huytram N Nguyen3, Phioanh L Nghiemphu2, Whitney B Pope4, Timothy F Cloughesy2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Evaluation of nonenhancing tumor (NET) burden is an important yet challenging part of brain tumor response assessment. This study focuses on using dual-echo turbo spin-echo MRI as a means of quickly estimating tissue T2, which can be used to objectively define NET burden. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: A series of experiments were performed to establish the use of T2 maps for defining NET burden. First, variation in T2 was determined using the American College of Radiology (ACR) water phantoms in 16 scanners evaluated over 3 years. Next, the sensitivity and specificity of T2 maps for delineating NET from other tissues were examined. Then, T2-defined NET was used to predict survival in separate subsets of patients with glioblastoma treated with radiotherapy, concurrent radiation, and chemotherapy, or bevacizumab at recurrence.
RESULTS: Variability in T2 in the ACR phantom was 3% to 5%. In training data, ROC analysis suggested that 125 ms < T2 < 250 ms could delineate NET with a sensitivity of >90% and specificity of >65%. Using this criterion, NET burden after completion of radiotherapy alone, or concurrent radiotherapy, and chemotherapy was shown to be predictive of survival (Cox, P < 0.05), and the change in NET volume before and after bevacizumab therapy in recurrent glioblastoma was also a predictive of survival (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: T2 maps using dual-echo data are feasible, stable, and can be used to objectively define NET burden for use in brain tumor characterization, prognosis, and response assessment. The use of effective T2 maps for defining NET burden should be validated in a randomized, clinical trial. ©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25901082      PMCID: PMC4592379          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-2862

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  39 in total

1.  Imaging-based stereotaxic serial biopsies in untreated intracranial glial neoplasms.

Authors:  P J Kelly; C Daumas-Duport; D B Kispert; B A Kall; B W Scheithauer; J J Illig
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Measurement of temporal lobe T2 relaxation times using a routine diagnostic MR imaging protocol in epilepsy.

Authors:  M Okujava; R Schulz; A Ebner; F G Woermann
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.045

3.  Nuclear magnetic resonance studies of several experimental and human malignant tumors.

Authors:  D P Hollis; J S Economou; L C Parks; J C Eggleston; L A Saryan; J L Czeister
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Water content and proton spin relaxation time for neoplastic and non-neoplastic tissues from mice and humans.

Authors:  W R Inch; J A McCredie; R R Knispel; R T Thompson; M M Pintar
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  MR imaging: possibility of tissue characterization of brain tumors using T1 and T2 values.

Authors:  M Komiyama; H Yagura; M Baba; T Yasui; A Hakuba; S Nishimura; Y Inoue
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1987 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Multiexponential proton spin-spin relaxation in MR imaging of human brain tumors.

Authors:  L R Schad; G Brix; I Zuna; W Härle; W J Lorenz; W Semmler
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

7.  Distinction between the preneoplastic and neoplastic state of murine mammary glands.

Authors:  C F Hazelwood; D C Chang; D Medina; G Cleveland; B L Nichols
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Stereotactic histologic correlations of computed tomography- and magnetic resonance imaging-defined abnormalities in patients with glial neoplasms.

Authors:  P J Kelly; C Daumas-Duport; B W Scheithauer; B A Kall; D B Kispert
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 7.616

9.  Relationship between hydration and proton nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation times in tissues of tumor-bearing and non-tumor-bearing mice: implications for cancer detection.

Authors:  C F Hazlewood; G Cleveland; D Medina
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Recognition of cancer in vivo by nuclear magnetic resonance.

Authors:  I D Weisman; L H Bennett; L R Maxwell; M W Woods; D Burk
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-12-22       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  8 in total

1.  Three-dimensional simultaneous brain T1 , T2 , and ADC mapping with MR Multitasking.

Authors:  Sen Ma; Christopher T Nguyen; Fei Han; Nan Wang; Zixin Deng; Nader Binesh; Franklin G Moser; Anthony G Christodoulou; Debiao Li
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Robust Estimation of Electron Density From Anatomic Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain Using a Unifying Multi-Atlas Approach.

Authors:  Shangjie Ren; Wendy Hara; Lei Wang; Mark K Buyyounouski; Quynh-Thu Le; Lei Xing; Ruijiang Li
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Volume of high-risk intratumoral subregions at multi-parametric MR imaging predicts overall survival and complements molecular analysis of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Yi Cui; Shangjie Ren; Khin Khin Tha; Jia Wu; Hiroki Shirato; Ruijiang Li
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  MR Fingerprinting of Adult Brain Tumors: Initial Experience.

Authors:  C Badve; A Yu; S Dastmalchian; M Rogers; D Ma; Y Jiang; S Margevicius; S Pahwa; Z Lu; M Schluchter; J Sunshine; M Griswold; A Sloan; V Gulani
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 5.  Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Patrick Y Wen; Susan M Chang; Martin J Van den Bent; Michael A Vogelbaum; David R Macdonald; Eudocia Q Lee
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines update on the role of imaging in the management of progressive glioblastoma in adults.

Authors:  Derek Richard Johnson; Chad Allan Glenn; Ramin Javan; Jeffrey James Olson
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 7.  An Update on the Approach to the Imaging of Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Katherine M Mullen; Raymond Y Huang
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 5.081

8.  Quantitative MRI using relaxometry in malignant gliomas detects contrast enhancement in peritumoral oedema.

Authors:  I Blystad; J B M Warntjes; Ö Smedby; P Lundberg; E-M Larsson; A Tisell
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.