Yi Cui1,2, Shangjie Ren3, Khin Khin Tha4,5, Jia Wu6, Hiroki Shirato4,5, Ruijiang Li6,4. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, 1070 Arastradero Rd., Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA. cuiyi@stanford.edu. 2. Global Station for Quantum Medical Science and Engineering, Global Institution for Collaborative Research and Education, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan. cuiyi@stanford.edu. 3. School of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Tianjin University, Tianjin Shi, China. 4. Global Station for Quantum Medical Science and Engineering, Global Institution for Collaborative Research and Education, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan. 5. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan. 6. Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, 1070 Arastradero Rd., Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a volume-based, quantitative imaging marker by integrating multi-parametric MR images for predicting glioblastoma survival, and to investigate its relationship and synergy with molecular characteristics. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 108 patients with primary glioblastoma. The discovery cohort consisted of 62 patients from the cancer genome atlas (TCGA). Another 46 patients comprising 30 from TCGA and 16 internally were used for independent validation. Based on integrated analyses of T1-weighted contrast-enhanced (T1-c) and diffusion-weighted MR images, we identified an intratumoral subregion with both high T1-c and low ADC, and accordingly defined a high-risk volume (HRV). We evaluated its prognostic value and biological significance with genomic data. RESULTS: On both discovery and validation cohorts, HRV predicted overall survival (OS) (concordance index: 0.642 and 0.653, P < 0.001 and P = 0.038, respectively). HRV stratified patients within the proneural molecular subtype (log-rank P = 0.040, hazard ratio = 2.787). We observed different OS among patients depending on their MGMT methylation status and HRV (log-rank P = 0.011). Patients with unmethylated MGMT and high HRV had significantly shorter survival (median survival: 9.3 vs. 18.4 months, log-rank P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Volume of the high-risk intratumoral subregion identified on multi-parametric MRI predicts glioblastoma survival, and may provide complementary value to genomic information. KEY POINTS: • High-risk volume (HRV) defined on multi-parametric MRI predicted GBM survival. • The proneural molecular subtype tended to harbour smaller HRV than other subtypes. • Patients with unmethylated MGMT and high HRV had significantly shorter survival. • HRV complements genomic information in predicting GBM survival.
OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a volume-based, quantitative imaging marker by integrating multi-parametric MR images for predicting glioblastoma survival, and to investigate its relationship and synergy with molecular characteristics. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 108 patients with primary glioblastoma. The discovery cohort consisted of 62 patients from the cancer genome atlas (TCGA). Another 46 patients comprising 30 from TCGA and 16 internally were used for independent validation. Based on integrated analyses of T1-weighted contrast-enhanced (T1-c) and diffusion-weighted MR images, we identified an intratumoral subregion with both high T1-c and low ADC, and accordingly defined a high-risk volume (HRV). We evaluated its prognostic value and biological significance with genomic data. RESULTS: On both discovery and validation cohorts, HRV predicted overall survival (OS) (concordance index: 0.642 and 0.653, P < 0.001 and P = 0.038, respectively). HRV stratified patients within the proneural molecular subtype (log-rank P = 0.040, hazard ratio = 2.787). We observed different OS among patients depending on their MGMT methylation status and HRV (log-rank P = 0.011). Patients with unmethylated MGMT and high HRV had significantly shorter survival (median survival: 9.3 vs. 18.4 months, log-rank P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Volume of the high-risk intratumoral subregion identified on multi-parametric MRI predicts glioblastoma survival, and may provide complementary value to genomic information. KEY POINTS: • High-risk volume (HRV) defined on multi-parametric MRI predicted GBM survival. • The proneural molecular subtype tended to harbour smaller HRV than other subtypes. • Patients with unmethylated MGMT and high HRV had significantly shorter survival. • HRV complements genomic information in predicting GBM survival.
Authors: Benjamin M Ellingson; Robert J Harris; Davis C Woodworth; Kevin Leu; Okkar Zaw; Warren P Mason; Solmaz Sahebjam; Lauren E Abrey; Dana T Aftab; Gisela M Schwab; Colin Hessel; Albert Lai; Phioanh L Nghiemphu; Whitney B Pope; Patrick Y Wen; Timothy F Cloughesy Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2016-08-31 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Leonard Sunwoo; Seung Hong Choi; Chul-Kee Park; Jin Wook Kim; Kyung Sik Yi; Woong Jae Lee; Tae Jin Yoon; Sang Woo Song; Ja Eun Kim; Ji Young Kim; Tae Min Kim; Se-Hoon Lee; Ji-Hoon Kim; Chul-Ho Sohn; Sung-Hye Park; Il Han Kim; Kee-Hyun Chang Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2012-09-28 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Andrea Sottoriva; Inmaculada Spiteri; Sara G M Piccirillo; Anestis Touloumis; V Peter Collins; John C Marioni; Christina Curtis; Colin Watts; Simon Tavaré Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-02-14 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Sona Saksena; Rajan Jain; Jayant Narang; Lisa Scarpace; Lonni R Schultz; Norman L Lehman; David Hearshen; Suresh C Patel; Tom Mikkelsen Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Olivier Gevaert; Lex A Mitchell; Achal S Achrol; Jiajing Xu; Sebastian Echegaray; Gary K Steinberg; Samuel H Cheshier; Sandy Napel; Greg Zaharchuk; Sylvia K Plevritis Journal: Radiology Date: 2014-05-12 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Matthew Grech-Sollars; Patrick W Hales; Keiko Miyazaki; Felix Raschke; Daniel Rodriguez; Martin Wilson; Simrandip K Gill; Tina Banks; Dawn E Saunders; Jonathan D Clayden; Matt N Gwilliam; Thomas R Barrick; Paul S Morgan; Nigel P Davies; James Rossiter; Dorothee P Auer; Richard Grundy; Martin O Leach; Franklyn A Howe; Andrew C Peet; Chris A Clark Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Chintan Parmar; Emmanuel Rios Velazquez; Ralph Leijenaar; Mohammed Jermoumi; Sara Carvalho; Raymond H Mak; Sushmita Mitra; B Uma Shankar; Ron Kikinis; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Philippe Lambin; Hugo J W L Aerts Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-07-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Juan Jiménez-Sánchez; Álvaro Martínez-Rubio; Anton Popov; Julián Pérez-Beteta; Youness Azimzade; David Molina-García; Juan Belmonte-Beitia; Gabriel F Calvo; Víctor M Pérez-García Journal: PLoS Comput Biol Date: 2021-02-10 Impact factor: 4.475
Authors: J Pérez-Beteta; D Molina-García; M Villena; M J Rodríguez; C Velásquez; J Martino; B Meléndez-Asensio; Á Rodríguez de Lope; R Morcillo; J M Sepúlveda; A Hernández-Laín; A Ramos; J A Barcia; P C Lara; D Albillo; A Revert; E Arana; V M Pérez-García Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-03-28 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Mariarosaria Incoronato; Marco Aiello; Teresa Infante; Carlo Cavaliere; Anna Maria Grimaldi; Peppino Mirabelli; Serena Monti; Marco Salvatore Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2017-04-12 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Mingquan Lin; Jacob F Wynne; Boran Zhou; Tonghe Wang; Yang Lei; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Xiaofeng Yang Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2021-06-24 Impact factor: 2.102