C Badve1, A Yu2, S Dastmalchian3, M Rogers2, D Ma3, Y Jiang4, S Margevicius5, S Pahwa3, Z Lu2, M Schluchter5, J Sunshine3, M Griswold3,4, A Sloan6, V Gulani3,4. 1. From the Department of Radiology (C.B., S.D., D.M., S.P., J.S., M.G., V.G.), University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio chaitra.badve@uhhospitals.org. 2. School of Medicine (A.Y., M.R., Z.L.). 3. From the Department of Radiology (C.B., S.D., D.M., S.P., J.S., M.G., V.G.), University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio. 4. Department of Biomedical Engineering (Y.J., M.G., V.G.). 5. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.M., M.S.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio. 6. Departments of Neurosurgery and Pathology (A.S.), University Hospitals-Cleveland Medical Center, Seidman Cancer Center and the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MR fingerprinting allows rapid simultaneous quantification of T1 and T2 relaxation times. This study assessed the utility of MR fingerprinting in differentiating common types of adult intra-axial brain tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR fingerprinting acquisition was performed in 31 patients with untreated intra-axial brain tumors: 17 glioblastomas, 6 World Health Organization grade II lower grade gliomas, and 8 metastases. T1, T2 of the solid tumor, immediate peritumoral white matter, and contralateral white matter were summarized within each ROI. Statistical comparisons on mean, SD, skewness, and kurtosis were performed by using the univariate Wilcoxon rank sum test across various tumor types. Bonferroni correction was used to correct for multiple-comparison testing. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed for discrimination between glioblastomas and metastases, and area under the receiver operator curve was calculated. RESULTS: Mean T2 values could differentiate solid tumor regions of lower grade gliomas from metastases (mean, 172 ± 53 ms, and 105 ± 27 ms, respectively; P = .004, significant after Bonferroni correction). The mean T1 of peritumoral white matter surrounding lower grade gliomas differed from peritumoral white matter around glioblastomas (mean, 1066 ± 218 ms, and 1578 ± 331 ms, respectively; P = .004, significant after Bonferroni correction). Logistic regression analysis revealed that the mean T2 of solid tumor offered the best separation between glioblastomas and metastases with an area under the curve of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.69-1.00; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: MR fingerprinting allows rapid simultaneous T1 and T2 measurement in brain tumors and surrounding tissues. MR fingerprinting-based relaxometry can identify quantitative differences between solid tumor regions of lower grade gliomas and metastases and between peritumoral regions of glioblastomas and lower grade gliomas.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MR fingerprinting allows rapid simultaneous quantification of T1 and T2 relaxation times. This study assessed the utility of MR fingerprinting in differentiating common types of adult intra-axial brain tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR fingerprinting acquisition was performed in 31 patients with untreated intra-axial brain tumors: 17 glioblastomas, 6 World Health Organization grade II lower grade gliomas, and 8 metastases. T1, T2 of the solid tumor, immediate peritumoral white matter, and contralateral white matter were summarized within each ROI. Statistical comparisons on mean, SD, skewness, and kurtosis were performed by using the univariate Wilcoxon rank sum test across various tumor types. Bonferroni correction was used to correct for multiple-comparison testing. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed for discrimination between glioblastomas and metastases, and area under the receiver operator curve was calculated. RESULTS: Mean T2 values could differentiate solid tumor regions of lower grade gliomas from metastases (mean, 172 ± 53 ms, and 105 ± 27 ms, respectively; P = .004, significant after Bonferroni correction). The mean T1 of peritumoral white matter surrounding lower grade gliomas differed from peritumoral white matter around glioblastomas (mean, 1066 ± 218 ms, and 1578 ± 331 ms, respectively; P = .004, significant after Bonferroni correction). Logistic regression analysis revealed that the mean T2 of solid tumor offered the best separation between glioblastomas and metastases with an area under the curve of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.69-1.00; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: MR fingerprinting allows rapid simultaneous T1 and T2 measurement in brain tumors and surrounding tissues. MR fingerprinting-based relaxometry can identify quantitative differences between solid tumor regions of lower grade gliomas and metastases and between peritumoral regions of glioblastomas and lower grade gliomas.
Authors: Elke Hattingen; Alina Jurcoane; Keivan Daneshvar; Ulrich Pilatus; Michel Mittelbronn; Joachim P Steinbach; Oliver Bähr Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2013-08-07 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Yun Jiang; Dan Ma; Kathryn E Keenan; Karl F Stupic; Vikas Gulani; Mark A Griswold Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2016-10-27 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: David O Kamson; Csaba Juhász; Amy Buth; William J Kupsky; Geoffrey R Barger; Pulak K Chakraborty; Otto Muzik; Sandeep Mittal Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2013-01-09 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Jigisha P Thakkar; Therese A Dolecek; Craig Horbinski; Quinn T Ostrom; Donita D Lightner; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; John L Villano Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2014-07-22 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: S Cha; J M Lupo; M-H Chen; K R Lamborn; M W McDermott; M S Berger; S J Nelson; W P Dillon Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2007 Jun-Jul Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: S Palfi; K R Swanson; S De Boüard; F Chrétien; R Oliveira; R K Gherardi; J M Kros; M Peschanski; C Christov Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2004-08-16 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Sen Ma; Christopher T Nguyen; Fei Han; Nan Wang; Zixin Deng; Nader Binesh; Franklin G Moser; Anthony G Christodoulou; Debiao Li Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-11-25 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Eva M Serrao; Dimitri A Kessler; Bruno Carmo; Lucian Beer; Kevin M Brindle; Guido Buonincontri; Ferdia A Gallagher; Fiona J Gilbert; Edmund Godfrey; Martin J Graves; Mary A McLean; Evis Sala; Rolf F Schulte; Joshua D Kaggie Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-10-16 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Debra F McGivney; Rasim Boyacıoğlu; Yun Jiang; Megan E Poorman; Nicole Seiberlich; Vikas Gulani; Kathryn E Keenan; Mark A Griswold; Dan Ma Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2019-07-25 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Xinzeng Wang; Ali Pirasteh; James Brugarolas; Neil M Rofsky; Robert E Lenkinski; Ivan Pedrosa; Ananth J Madhuranthakam Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-02-14 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Rajan Jain; Derek R Johnson; Sohil H Patel; Mauricio Castillo; Marion Smits; Martin J van den Bent; Andrew S Chi; Daniel P Cahill Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2020-07-07 Impact factor: 12.300