Literature DB >> 28640707

Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Clinical Trials.

Patrick Y Wen1, Susan M Chang1, Martin J Van den Bent1, Michael A Vogelbaum1, David R Macdonald1, Eudocia Q Lee1.   

Abstract

Development of novel therapies for CNS tumors requires reliable assessment of response and progression. This requirement has been particularly challenging in neuro-oncology for which contrast enhancement serves as an imperfect surrogate for tumor volume and is influenced by agents that affect vascular permeability, such as antiangiogenic therapies. In addition, most tumors have a nonenhancing component that can be difficult to accurately quantify. To improve the response assessment in neuro-oncology and to standardize the criteria that are used for different CNS tumors, the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) working group was established. This multidisciplinary international working group consists of neuro-oncologists, medical oncologists, neuroradiologists, neurosurgeons, radiation oncologists, neuropsychologists, and experts in clinical outcomes assessments, working in collaboration with government and industry to enhance the interpretation of clinical trials. The RANO working group was originally created to update response criteria for high- and low-grade gliomas and to address such issues as pseudoresponse and nonenhancing tumor progression from antiangiogenic therapies, and pseudoprogression from radiochemotherapy. RANO has expanded to include working groups that are focused on other tumors, including brain metastases, leptomeningeal metastases, spine tumors, pediatric brain tumors, and meningiomas, as well as other clinical trial end points, such as clinical outcomes assessments, seizures, corticosteroid use, and positron emission tomography imaging. In an effort to standardize the measurement of neurologic function for clinical assessment, the Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology scale was drafted. Born out of a workshop conducted by the Jumpstarting Brain Tumor Drug Development Coalition and the US Food and Drug Administration, a standardized brain tumor imaging protocol now exists to reduce variability and improve reliability. Efforts by RANO have been widely accepted and are increasingly being used in neuro-oncology trials, although additional refinements will be needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28640707      PMCID: PMC5516482          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.72.7511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  52 in total

Review 1.  Response Assessment and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Issues for Clinical Trials Involving High-Grade Gliomas.

Authors:  Jerrold L Boxerman; Benjamin M Ellingson
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-06

2.  Report of the Jumpstarting Brain Tumor Drug Development Coalition and FDA clinical trials neuroimaging endpoint workshop (January 30, 2014, Bethesda MD).

Authors:  Patrick Y Wen; Timothy F Cloughesy; Benjamin M Ellingson; David A Reardon; Howard A Fine; Lauren Abrey; Karla Ballman; Martin Bendszuz; Jan Buckner; Susan M Chang; Michael D Prados; Whitney B Pope; Alma Gregory Sorensen; Martin van den Bent; Wai-Kwan Alfred Yung
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 3.  Leptomeningeal metastasis: a Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology critical review of endpoints and response criteria of published randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Marc Chamberlain; Riccardo Soffietti; Jeffrey Raizer; Roberta Rudà; Dieta Brandsma; Willem Boogerd; Sophie Taillibert; Morris D Groves; Emilie Le Rhun; Larry Junck; Martin van den Bent; Patrick Y Wen; Kurt A Jaeckle
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 4.  Pros and cons of current brain tumor imaging.

Authors:  Benjamin M Ellingson; Patrick Y Wen; Martin J van den Bent; Timothy F Cloughesy
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 5.  Clinical outcome assessment in malignant glioma trials: measuring signs, symptoms, and functional limitations.

Authors:  Jaishri O Blakeley; Stephen Joel Coons; John R Corboy; Nancy Kline Leidy; Tito R Mendoza; Jeffrey S Wefel
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 12.300

6.  Challenges with defining response to antitumor agents in pediatric neuro-oncology: a report from the response assessment in pediatric neuro-oncology (RAPNO) working group.

Authors:  Katherine E Warren; Tina Y Poussaint; Gilbert Vezina; Darren Hargrave; Roger J Packer; Stewart Goldman; Patrick Y Wen; Ian F Pollack; David Zurakowski; Larry E Kun; Michael D Prados; Stefan Rutkowski; Mark W Kieran
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 7.  Response assessment in neuro-oncology (a report of the RANO group): assessment of outcome in trials of diffuse low-grade gliomas.

Authors:  M J van den Bent; J S Wefel; D Schiff; M J B Taphoorn; K Jaeckle; L Junck; T Armstrong; A Choucair; A D Waldman; T Gorlia; M Chamberlain; B G Baumert; M A Vogelbaum; D R Macdonald; D A Reardon; P Y Wen; S M Chang; A H Jacobs
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 8.  Pseudoprogression and pseudoresponse in the treatment of gliomas.

Authors:  Dieta Brandsma; Martin J van den Bent
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.710

Review 9.  Seizure control as a new metric in assessing efficacy of tumor treatment in low-grade glioma trials.

Authors:  Edward K Avila; Marc Chamberlain; David Schiff; Jaap C Reijneveld; Terri S Armstrong; Roberta Ruda; Patrick Y Wen; Michael Weller; Johan A F Koekkoek; Sandeep Mittal; Yoshiki Arakawa; Ali Choucair; Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez; David R MacDonald; Ryo Nishikawa; Aashit Shah; Charles J Vecht; Paula Warren; Martin J van den Bent; Lisa M DeAngelis
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 10.  The use of amino acid PET and conventional MRI for monitoring of brain tumor therapy.

Authors:  Norbert Galldiks; Ian Law; Whitney B Pope; Javier Arbizu; Karl-Josef Langen
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 4.881

View more
  92 in total

Review 1.  Glioblastoma in adults: a Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) and European Society of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) consensus review on current management and future directions.

Authors:  Patrick Y Wen; Michael Weller; Eudocia Quant Lee; Brian M Alexander; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Floris P Barthel; Tracy T Batchelor; Ranjit S Bindra; Susan M Chang; E Antonio Chiocca; Timothy F Cloughesy; John F DeGroot; Evanthia Galanis; Mark R Gilbert; Monika E Hegi; Craig Horbinski; Raymond Y Huang; Andrew B Lassman; Emilie Le Rhun; Michael Lim; Minesh P Mehta; Ingo K Mellinghoff; Giuseppe Minniti; David Nathanson; Michael Platten; Matthias Preusser; Patrick Roth; Marc Sanson; David Schiff; Susan C Short; Martin J B Taphoorn; Joerg-Christian Tonn; Jonathan Tsang; Roel G W Verhaak; Andreas von Deimling; Wolfgang Wick; Gelareh Zadeh; David A Reardon; Kenneth D Aldape; Martin J van den Bent
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 12.300

2.  Variation in Toxicity Reporting Methods for Early Phase Lung Cancer Treatment Trials at Oncology Conferences.

Authors:  Emily A Simons; Derek E Smith; Dexiang Gao; D Ross Camidge
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 15.609

3.  Impact of initial midline shift in glioblastoma on survival.

Authors:  Johannes Wach; Motaz Hamed; Patrick Schuss; Erdem Güresir; Ulrich Herrlinger; Hartmut Vatter; Matthias Schneider
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Wide Range of Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Gliomatosis Cerebri Growth Pattern: A Clinical, Radiographic, and Histopathologic Study.

Authors:  K Ina Ly; Derek H Oakley; Alexander B Pine; Matthew P Frosch; Sy Han Chiou; Rebecca A Betensky; Stuart R Pomerantz; Fred H Hochberg; Tracy T Batchelor; Daniel P Cahill; Jorg Dietrich
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-08-10

5.  Consensus recommendations on standardized magnetic resonance imaging protocols for multicenter canine brain tumor clinical trials.

Authors:  Rebecca A Packer; John H Rossmeisl; Michael S Kent; John F Griffin; Christina Mazcko; Amy K LeBlanc
Journal:  Vet Radiol Ultrasound       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 1.363

6.  Guidance on the use of MRI for treatment planning in radiotherapy clinical trials.

Authors:  Robert I Johnstone; Teresa Guerrero-Urbano; Andriana Michaelidou; Tony Greener; Elizabeth Miles; David Eaton; Christopher Thomas
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Automated quantitative assessment of oncological disease progression using deep learning.

Authors:  Yiftach Barash; Eyal Klang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-12

Review 8.  Current concepts in radiologic assessment of pediatric brain tumors during treatment, part 1.

Authors:  Felice D'Arco; Sinead Culleton; Laurens J L De Cocker; Kshitij Mankad; Jorge Davila; Benita Tamrazi
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-07-06

9.  Third-line therapy in recurrent glioblastoma: is it another chance for bevacizumab?

Authors:  Enrico Franceschi; Giuseppe Lamberti; Alexandro Paccapelo; Monica Di Battista; Giovenzio Genestreti; Santino Minichillo; Antonella Mura; Stefania Bartolini; Raffaele Agati; Alba A Brandes
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  Metabolic Imaging of the Human Brain with Hyperpolarized 13C Pyruvate Demonstrates 13C Lactate Production in Brain Tumor Patients.

Authors:  Vesselin Z Miloushev; Kristin L Granlund; Rostislav Boltyanskiy; Serge K Lyashchenko; Lisa M DeAngelis; Ingo K Mellinghoff; Cameron W Brennan; Vivian Tabar; T Jonathan Yang; Andrei I Holodny; Ramon E Sosa; YanWei W Guo; Albert P Chen; James Tropp; Fraser Robb; Kayvan R Keshari
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 12.701

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.