Literature DB >> 25898892

Simultaneous carotid PET/MR: feasibility and improvement of magnetic resonance-based attenuation correction.

Jason Bini1,2, Mootaz Eldib1,2, Philip M Robson1,3, Claudia Calcagno1,3, Zahi A Fayad4,5,6.   

Abstract

Errors in quantification of carotid positron emission tomography (PET) in simultaneous PET/magnetic resonance (PET/MR) imaging when not incorporating bone in MR-based attenuation correction (MRAC) maps, and possible solutions, remain to be fully explored. In this study, we demonstrated techniques to improve carotid vascular PET/MR quantification by adding a bone tissue compartment to MRAC maps and deriving continuous Dixon-based MRAC (MRACCD) maps. We demonstrated the feasibility of applying ultrashort echo time-based bone segmentation and generation of continuous Dixon MRAC to improve PET quantification on five subjects. We examined four different MRAC maps: system standard PET/MR MRAC map (air, lung, fat, soft tissue) (MRACPET/MR), standard PET/MR MRAC map with bone (air, lung, fat, soft tissue, bone) (MRACPET/MRUTE), MRACCD map (no bone) and continuous Dixon-based MRAC map with bone (MRACCDUTE). The same PET emission data was then reconstructed with each respective MRAC map and a CTAC map (PETPET/MR, PETPET/MRUTE, PETCD, PECDUTE) to assess effects of the different attenuation maps on PET quantification in the carotid arteries and neighboring tissues. Quantitative comparison of MRAC attenuation values for each method compared to CTAC showed small differences in the carotid arteries with UTE-based segmentation of bone included and/or continuous Dixon MRAC; however, there was very good correlation for all methods in the voxel-by-voxel comparison. ROI-based analysis showed a similar trend in the carotid arteries with the lowest correlation to PETCTAC being PETPETMR and the highest correlation to PETCTAC being PETCDUTE. We have demonstrated the feasibility of applying UTE-based segmentation and continuous Dixon MRAC maps to improve carotid PET/MR vascular quantification.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attenuation correction; Carotid arteries; Dixon; PET/MR; Ultrashort echo time

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25898892      PMCID: PMC4618272          DOI: 10.1007/s10554-015-0661-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  27 in total

1.  The effect of errors in segmented attenuation maps on PET quantification.

Authors:  Vincent Keereman; Roel Van Holen; Pieter Mollet; Stefaan Vandenberghe
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Integrated PET/MR.

Authors:  Harald H Quick
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  MRI-guided attenuation correction in whole-body PET/MR: assessment of the effect of bone attenuation.

Authors:  A Akbarzadeh; M R Ay; A Ahmadian; N Riahi Alam; H Zaidi
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 2.668

4.  MRI-based attenuation correction for PET/MRI using ultrashort echo time sequences.

Authors:  Vincent Keereman; Yves Fierens; Tom Broux; Yves De Deene; Max Lonneux; Stefaan Vandenberghe
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Toward implementing an MRI-based PET attenuation-correction method for neurologic studies on the MR-PET brain prototype.

Authors:  Ciprian Catana; Andre van der Kouwe; Thomas Benner; Christian J Michel; Michael Hamm; Matthias Fenchel; Bruce Fischl; Bruce Rosen; Matthias Schmand; A Gregory Sorensen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Magnetic resonance-based attenuation correction for PET/MR hybrid imaging using continuous valued attenuation maps.

Authors:  Bharath K Navalpakkam; Harald Braun; Torsten Kuwert; Harald H Quick
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  PET attenuation coefficients from CT images: experimental evaluation of the transformation of CT into PET 511-keV attenuation coefficients.

Authors:  C Burger; G Goerres; S Schoenes; A Buck; A H R Lonn; G K Von Schulthess
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2002-04-19       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Predictors of change in carotid atherosclerotic plaque inflammation and burden as measured by 18-FDG-PET and MRI, respectively, in the dal-PLAQUE study.

Authors:  Venkatesh Mani; Mark Woodward; Daniel Samber; Jan Bucerius; Ahmed Tawakol; David Kallend; James H F Rudd; Markus Abt; Zahi A Fayad
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Cluster-based segmentation of dual-echo ultra-short echo time images for PET/MR bone localization.

Authors:  Gaspar Delso; Konstantinos Zeimpekis; Michael Carl; Florian Wiesinger; Martin Hüllner; Patrick Veit-Haibach
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2014-06-04
View more
  8 in total

1.  Topical issue: multimodality imaging in atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Sasan Partovi; Johan H C Reiber; Brian B Ghoshhajra
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  High-risk plaque features can be detected in non-stenotic carotid plaques of patients with ischaemic stroke classified as cryptogenic using combined (18)F-FDG PET/MR imaging.

Authors:  Fabien Hyafil; Andreas Schindler; Dominik Sepp; Tilman Obenhuber; Anna Bayer-Karpinska; Tobias Boeckh-Behrens; Sabine Höhn; Marcus Hacker; Stephan G Nekolla; Axel Rominger; Martin Dichgans; Markus Schwaiger; Tobias Saam; Holger Poppert
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-10-03       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Feasibility of carotid artery PET/MRI in psoriasis patients.

Authors:  Prabhakar Rajiah; Mojgan Hojjati; Ziang Lu; Vijaya Kosaraju; Sasan Partovi; James K O'Donnell; Christopher Longenecker; Grace A McComsey; Jackelyn B Golden; Fuad Muakkassa; Scott Santilli; Thomas S McCormick; Kevin D Cooper; Neil J Korman
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-08-20

Review 4.  Attenuation Correction for Magnetic Resonance Coils in Combined PET/MR Imaging: A Review.

Authors:  Mootaz Eldib; Jason Bini; David D Faul; Niels Oesingmann; Charalampos Tsoumpas; Zahi A Fayad
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2015-11-27

Review 5.  Imaging of atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Richard A P Takx; Sasan Partovi; Brian B Ghoshhajra
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 6.  Whole-Body Atherosclerosis Imaging by Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging: From Mice to Nonhuman Primates.

Authors:  Claudia Calcagno; Carlos Pérez-Medina; Willem J M Mulder; Zahi A Fayad
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 8.311

Review 7.  Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI to Study Atherosclerotic Plaque Microvasculature.

Authors:  Raf H M van Hoof; Sylvia Heeneman; Joachim E Wildberger; M Eline Kooi
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.113

8.  Feasibility of Deep Learning-Based PET/MR Attenuation Correction in the Pelvis Using Only Diagnostic MR Images.

Authors:  Tyler J Bradshaw; Gengyan Zhao; Hyungseok Jang; Fang Liu; Alan B McMillan
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2018-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.