Prachi Pandit1, Julien Rivoire1, Kevin King2, Xiaojuan Li1. 1. Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA. 2. GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Quantitative T1ρ imaging is beneficial for early detection for osteoarthritis but has seen limited clinical use due to long scan times. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of accelerated T1ρ mapping for knee cartilage quantification using a combination of compressed sensing (CS) and data-driven parallel imaging (ARC-Autocalibrating Reconstruction for Cartesian sampling). METHODS: A sequential combination of ARC and CS, both during data acquisition and reconstruction, was used to accelerate the acquisition of T1ρ maps. Phantom, ex vivo (porcine knee), and in vivo (human knee) imaging was performed on a GE 3T MR750 scanner. T1ρ quantification after CS-accelerated acquisition was compared with non CS-accelerated acquisition for various cartilage compartments. RESULTS: Accelerating image acquisition using CS did not introduce major deviations in quantification. The coefficient of variation for the root mean squared error increased with increasing acceleration, but for in vivo measurements, it stayed under 5% for a net acceleration factor up to 2, where the acquisition was 25% faster than the reference (only ARC). CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first implementation of CS for in vivo T1ρ quantification. These early results show that this technique holds great promise in making quantitative imaging techniques more accessible for clinical applications.
PURPOSE: Quantitative T1ρ imaging is beneficial for early detection for osteoarthritis but has seen limited clinical use due to long scan times. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of accelerated T1ρ mapping for knee cartilage quantification using a combination of compressed sensing (CS) and data-driven parallel imaging (ARC-Autocalibrating Reconstruction for Cartesian sampling). METHODS: A sequential combination of ARC and CS, both during data acquisition and reconstruction, was used to accelerate the acquisition of T1ρ maps. Phantom, ex vivo (porcine knee), and in vivo (human knee) imaging was performed on a GE 3T MR750 scanner. T1ρ quantification after CS-accelerated acquisition was compared with non CS-accelerated acquisition for various cartilage compartments. RESULTS: Accelerating image acquisition using CS did not introduce major deviations in quantification. The coefficient of variation for the root mean squared error increased with increasing acceleration, but for in vivo measurements, it stayed under 5% for a net acceleration factor up to 2, where the acquisition was 25% faster than the reference (only ARC). CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first implementation of CS for in vivo T1ρ quantification. These early results show that this technique holds great promise in making quantitative imaging techniques more accessible for clinical applications.
Authors: Philip M Robson; Aaron K Grant; Ananth J Madhuranthakam; Riccardo Lattanzi; Daniel K Sodickson; Charles A McKenzie Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: R I Bolbos; Jin Zuo; Suchandrima Banerjee; Thomas M Link; C Benjamin Ma; Xiaojuan Li; Sharmila Majumdar Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2008-04-02 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Garry E Gold; Christina A Chen; Seungbum Koo; Brian A Hargreaves; Neal K Bangerter Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Rajiv G Menon; Marcelo V W Zibetti; Rajan Jain; Yulin Ge; Ravinder R Regatte Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2020-11-15 Impact factor: 4.813