Chengcheng Zhu1, Bing Tian2, Luguang Chen2, Laura Eisenmenger3, Esther Raithel4, Christoph Forman4, Sinyeob Ahn5, Gerhard Laub5, Qi Liu2, Jianping Lu6, Jing Liu3, Christopher Hess3, David Saloner3. 1. Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA. Chengcheng.Zhu@ucsf.edu. 2. Department of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China. 3. Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA. 4. Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany. 5. Siemens Healthcare, San Francisco, CA, USA. 6. Department of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China. cjr.lujianping@vip.163.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Develop and optimize an accelerated, high-resolution (0.5 mm isotropic) 3D black blood MRI technique to reduce scan time for whole-brain intracranial vessel wall imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 3D accelerated T1-weighted fast-spin-echo prototype sequence using compressed sensing (CS-SPACE) was developed at 3T. Both the acquisition [echo train length (ETL), under-sampling factor] and reconstruction parameters (regularization parameter, number of iterations) were first optimized in 5 healthy volunteers. Ten patients with a variety of intracranial vascular disease presentations (aneurysm, atherosclerosis, dissection, vasculitis) were imaged with SPACE and optimized CS-SPACE, pre and post Gd contrast. Lumen/wall area, wall-to-lumen contrast ratio (CR), enhancement ratio (ER), sharpness, and qualitative scores (1-4) by two radiologists were recorded. RESULTS: The optimized CS-SPACE protocol has ETL 60, 20% k-space under-sampling, 0.002 regularization factor with 20 iterations. In patient studies, CS-SPACE and conventional SPACE had comparable image scores both pre- (3.35 ± 0.85 vs. 3.54 ± 0.65, p = 0.13) and post-contrast (3.72 ± 0.58 vs. 3.53 ± 0.57, p = 0.15), but the CS-SPACE acquisition was 37% faster (6:48 vs. 10:50). CS-SPACE agreed with SPACE for lumen/wall area, ER measurements and sharpness, but marginally reduced the CR. CONCLUSION: In the evaluation of intracranial vascular disease, CS-SPACE provides a substantial reduction in scan time compared to conventional T1-weighted SPACE while maintaining good image quality.
OBJECTIVE: Develop and optimize an accelerated, high-resolution (0.5 mm isotropic) 3D black blood MRI technique to reduce scan time for whole-brain intracranial vessel wall imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 3D accelerated T1-weighted fast-spin-echo prototype sequence using compressed sensing (CS-SPACE) was developed at 3T. Both the acquisition [echo train length (ETL), under-sampling factor] and reconstruction parameters (regularization parameter, number of iterations) were first optimized in 5 healthy volunteers. Ten patients with a variety of intracranial vascular disease presentations (aneurysm, atherosclerosis, dissection, vasculitis) were imaged with SPACE and optimized CS-SPACE, pre and post Gd contrast. Lumen/wall area, wall-to-lumen contrast ratio (CR), enhancement ratio (ER), sharpness, and qualitative scores (1-4) by two radiologists were recorded. RESULTS: The optimized CS-SPACE protocol has ETL 60, 20% k-space under-sampling, 0.002 regularization factor with 20 iterations. In patient studies, CS-SPACE and conventional SPACE had comparable image scores both pre- (3.35 ± 0.85 vs. 3.54 ± 0.65, p = 0.13) and post-contrast (3.72 ± 0.58 vs. 3.53 ± 0.57, p = 0.15), but the CS-SPACE acquisition was 37% faster (6:48 vs. 10:50). CS-SPACE agreed with SPACE for lumen/wall area, ER measurements and sharpness, but marginally reduced the CR. CONCLUSION: In the evaluation of intracranial vascular disease, CS-SPACE provides a substantial reduction in scan time compared to conventional T1-weighted SPACE while maintaining good image quality.
Entities:
Keywords:
3D black blood SPACE; Aneurysm; Atherosclerosis; Compressed sensing; Intracranial vessel wall MRI
Authors: Guobin Li; Jürgen Hennig; Esther Raithel; Martin Büchert; Dominik Paul; Jan G Korvink; Maxim Zaitsev Journal: MAGMA Date: 2015-02-26 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Chengcheng Zhu; Henrik Haraldsson; Bing Tian; Karl Meisel; Nerissa Ko; Michael Lawton; John Grinstead; Sinyeob Ahn; Gerhard Laub; Christopher Hess; David Saloner Journal: MAGMA Date: 2016-03-05 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Martin Uecker; Peng Lai; Mark J Murphy; Patrick Virtue; Michael Elad; John M Pauly; Shreyas S Vasanawala; Michael Lustig Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Jianmin Yuan; Ammara Usman; Scott A Reid; Kevin F King; Andrew J Patterson; Jonathan H Gillard; Martin J Graves Journal: MAGMA Date: 2017-06-26 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: C Zhu; X Wang; L Eisenmenger; B Tian; Q Liu; A J Degnan; C Hess; D Saloner; J Lu Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-05-23 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Raghav R Mattay; Jose F Saucedo; Vance T Lehman; Jiayu Xiao; Emmanuel C Obusez; Scott B Raymond; Zhaoyang Fan; Jae W Song Journal: Semin Ultrasound CT MR Date: 2021-08-01 Impact factor: 1.641
Authors: B Sannananja; C Zhu; C G Colip; A Somasundaram; M Ibrahim; T Khrisat; M Mossa-Basha Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2022-05-26 Impact factor: 4.966
Authors: Jae W Song; Brianna F Moon; Morgan P Burke; Srikant Kamesh Iyer; Mark A Elliott; Haochang Shou; Steven R Messé; Scott E Kasner; Laurie A Loevner; Mitchell D Schnall; John E Kirsch; Walter R Witschey; Zhaoyang Fan Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2020-05-11 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Tuula Peñate Medina; Jan Philip Kolb; Gereon Hüttmann; Robert Huber; Oula Peñate Medina; Linh Ha; Patricia Ulloa; Naomi Larsen; Arianna Ferrari; Magdalena Rafecas; Mark Ellrichmann; Mariya S Pravdivtseva; Mariia Anikeeva; Jana Humbert; Marcus Both; Jennifer E Hundt; Jan-Bernd Hövener Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2021-06-24 Impact factor: 7.561