Literature DB >> 32040226

Resolution-dependent influences of compressed sensing in quantitative T2 mapping of articular cartilage.

Nian Wang1,2, Farid Badar3, Yang Xia3.   

Abstract

This study evaluates the resolution-dependent influences of compressed sensing (CS) in MRI quantification of T2 mapping in articular cartilage with osteoarthritis (OA). T2-weighed 2D experiments of healthy and OA cartilage were fully sampled in k-space with five echo times at both 17.6 μm and 195.3 μm in-plane resolutions; termed as microscopic MRI (μMRI) and macroscopic MRI (mMRI) respectively. These fully sampled k-space data were under-sampled at various 2D CS accelerating factors (AF = 4-32). The under-sampled data were reconstructed individually into 2D images using nonlinear reconstruction, which were used to calculate the T2 maps. The bulk and zonal variations of T2 values in cartilage were evaluated at different AFs. The study finds that the T2 images at AFs up to 8 preserved major visual information and produced negligible artifacts for μMRI. The T2 values remained accurate for different sub-tissue zones at various AFs. The absolute difference between the CS (AF up to 32) and the Ground Truth (i.e., using 100% of the k-space data) of the mean T2 values through the whole tissue depth was higher in mMRI versus μMRI. For mMRI (where the resolution mimics the clinical MRI of human cartilage), the quantitative T2 mapping at AFs up to 4 showed negligible variations. This study demonstrates that both clinical MRI and μMRI can benefit from the use of CS in image acquisition, and μMRI benefits more from the use of CS by acquiring much less data, without losing significant accuracy in the quantification of T2 maps in osteoarthritic cartilage.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; T2; cartilage; clinical; compressed sensing; microscopic

Year:  2020        PMID: 32040226      PMCID: PMC7415577          DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  39 in total

Review 1.  Biophysical chemistry of cartilaginous tissues with special reference to solute and fluid transport.

Authors:  A Maroudas
Journal:  Biorheology       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 1.875

2.  Compressed sensing in quantitative determination of GAG concentration in cartilage by microscopic MRI.

Authors:  Nian Wang; Farid Badar; Yang Xia
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Structure, function, and degeneration of bovine hyaline cartilage: assessment with MR imaging in vitro.

Authors:  K B Lehner; H P Rechl; J K Gmeinwieser; A F Heuck; H P Lukas; H P Kohl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Depth and orientational dependencies of MRI T(2) and T(1ρ) sensitivities towards trypsin degradation and Gd-DTPA(2-) presence in articular cartilage at microscopic resolution.

Authors:  Nian Wang; Yang Xia
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Compressed sensing sodium MRI of cartilage at 7T: preliminary study.

Authors:  Guillaume Madelin; Gregory Chang; Ricardo Otazo; Alexej Jerschow; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 2.229

6.  Accelerated T1ρ acquisition for knee cartilage quantification using compressed sensing and data-driven parallel imaging: A feasibility study.

Authors:  Prachi Pandit; Julien Rivoire; Kevin King; Xiaojuan Li
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Stromelysin, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases and proteoglycan fragments in human knee joint fluid after injury.

Authors:  L S Lohmander; L A Hoerrner; L Dahlberg; H Roos; S Björnsson; M W Lark
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.666

8.  Prospective comparison of 3D FIESTA versus fat-suppressed 3D SPGR MRI in evaluating knee cartilage lesions.

Authors:  X Li; C Yu; H Wu; K Daniel; D Hu; L Xia; C Pan; A Xu; J Hu; L Wang; W Peng; F Li
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 2.350

9.  MRI properties of a unique hypo-intense layer in degraded articular cartilage.

Authors:  Nian Wang; Farid Badar; Yang Xia
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  MRI of articular cartilage at microscopic resolution.

Authors:  Y Xia
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 5.853

View more
  2 in total

1.  Review of Quantitative Knee Articular Cartilage MR Imaging.

Authors:  Mai Banjar; Saya Horiuchi; David N Gedeon; Hiroshi Yoshioka
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 2.760

2.  Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Femoral Head Articular Cartilage Change in Patients with Hip Osteonecrosis Treated with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy.

Authors:  Lijun Shi; Xu Yang; Peixu Wang; Xiangwei Ma; Dan Li; Xinjie Wu; Fuqiang Gao; Wei Sun
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 3.149

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.