Literature DB >> 25870807

Sutureless aortic valve replacement.

Marco Di Eusanio1, Kevin Phan1.   

Abstract

The increasing incidence of aortic stenosis and greater co-morbidities and risk profiles of the contemporary patient population has driven the development of minimally invasive aortic valve surgery and percutaneous transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) techniques to reduce surgical trauma. Recent technological developments have led to an alternative minimally invasive option which avoids the placement and tying of sutures, known as "sutureless" or rapid deployment aortic valves. Potential advantages for sutureless aortic prostheses include reducing cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) duration, facilitating minimally invasive surgery and complex cardiac interventions, whilst maintaining satisfactory hemodynamic outcomes and low paravalvular leak rates. However, given its recent developments, the majority of evidence regarding sutureless aortic valve replacement (SU-AVR) is limited to observational studies and there is a paucity of adequately-powered randomized studies. Recently, the International Valvular Surgery Study Group (IVSSG) has formulated to conduct the Sutureless Projects, set to be the largest international collaborative group to investigate this technology. This keynote lecture will overview the use, the potential advantages, the caveats, and current evidence of sutureless and rapid deployment aortic valve replacement (AVR).

Entities:  

Keywords:  International Valvular Surgery Study Group (IVSSG); Sutureless valve; aortic valve replacement (AVR); minimally invasive; rapid deployment prosthesis

Year:  2015        PMID: 25870807      PMCID: PMC4384242          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2015.02.06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 2225-319X


  45 in total

1.  Port-access-assisted aortic valve replacement: a comparison of minimally invasive and conventional techniques.

Authors:  Bradley G Leshnower; Candace S Trace; Robert S Boova
Journal:  Heart Surg Forum       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 0.676

2.  Expanding the indication for sutureless aortic valve replacement to patients with mitral disease.

Authors:  Tam Hoang Minh; Amine Mazine; Ismail Bouhout; Ismail El-Hamamsy; Michel Carrier; Denis Bouchard; Philippe Demers
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Conventional versus minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: pooled analysis of propensity-matched data.

Authors:  Ju Y Lim; Salil V Deo; Salah E Altarabsheh; Sung H Jung; Patricia J Erwin; Alan H Markowitz; Soon J Park
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 1.620

Review 4.  Minimally invasive reoperative aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Jessie J Zhou; Nithya Niranjan; Marco Di Eusanio; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-01

5.  Postoperative conduction disorders after implantation of the self-expandable sutureless Perceval S bioprosthesis.

Authors:  Astrid G M van Boxtel; Patrick Houthuizen; Mohamed A Soliman Hamad; Jelena Sjatskig; Erwin Tan; Frits W Prinzen; Albert H M van Straten
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2014-05

6.  A randomized multicenter trial of minimally invasive rapid deployment versus conventional full sternotomy aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Michael A Borger; Vadim Moustafine; Lenard Conradi; Christoph Knosalla; Markus Richter; Denis R Merk; Torsten Doenst; Robert Hammerschmidt; Hendrik Treede; Pascal Dohmen; Justus T Strauch
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Aortic valve replacement and concomitant procedures with the Perceval valve: results of European trials.

Authors:  Malakh Shrestha; Thierry A Folliguet; Steffen Pfeiffer; Bart Meuris; Thierry Carrel; Matthias Bechtel; Willem J Flameng; Theodor Fischlein; François Laborde; Axel Haverich
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Cardiopulmonary bypass duration is an independent predictor of morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Stefano Salis; Valeria V Mazzanti; Guido Merli; Luca Salvi; Calogero C Tedesco; Fabrizio Veglia; Erminio Sisillo
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 2.628

9.  Long-term outcomes of inoperable patients with aortic stenosis randomly assigned to transcatheter aortic valve replacement or standard therapy.

Authors:  Samir R Kapadia; E Murat Tuzcu; Raj R Makkar; Lars G Svensson; Shikhar Agarwal; Susheel Kodali; Gregory P Fontana; John G Webb; Michael Mack; Vinod H Thourani; Vasilis C Babaliaros; Howard C Herrmann; Wilson Szeto; Augusto D Pichard; Mathew R Williams; William N Anderson; Jodi J Akin; D Craig Miller; Craig R Smith; Martin B Leon
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Isolated aortic valve replacement in North America comprising 108,687 patients in 10 years: changes in risks, valve types, and outcomes in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database.

Authors:  James M Brown; Sean M O'Brien; Changfu Wu; Jo Ann H Sikora; Bartley P Griffith; James S Gammie
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.209

View more
  15 in total

1.  A mechanistic investigation of the EDWARDS INTUITY Elite valve's hemodynamic performance.

Authors:  Vahid Sadri; Charles H Bloodworth; Immanuel David Madukauwa-David; Prem A Midha; Vrishank Raghav; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-06-27

2.  Early results of the Sorin® Perceval S sutureless valve: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Karan Sian; Sheila Li; Daneish Selvakumar; Ross Mejia
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Sutureless aortic valve replacement in high risk patients neutralizes expected worse hospital outcome: A clinical and economic analysis.

Authors:  Emmanuel Villa; Margherita Dalla Tomba; Antonio Messina; Andrea Trenta; Federico Brunelli; Marco Cirillo; Zean Mhagna; Giovanni Alfonso Chiariello; Giovanni Troise
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 2.737

Review 4.  Recent advances in aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Ahmed Al-Adhami; Nawwar Al-Attar
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-10-20

5.  Early Clinical Experience with Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Do Jung Kim; Hyo-Hyun Kim; Shin-Young Lee; Sak Lee; Byung-Chul Chang
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-02-05

6.  Cost-utility of surgical sutureless bioprostheses vs TAVI in aortic valve replacement for patients at intermediate and high surgical risk.

Authors:  Massimiliano Povero; Antonio Miceli; Lorenzo Pradelli; Matteo Ferrarini; Matteo Pinciroli; Mattia Glauber
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2018-11-08

7.  Valve-in-Valve Replacement Using a Sutureless Aortic Valve.

Authors:  Pascal M Dohmen; Lukas Lehmkuhl; Michael A Borger; Martin Misfeld; Friedrich W Mohr
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2016-10-03

8.  Early Outcomes of Sutureless Aortic Valves.

Authors:  Muhammet Onur Hanedan; İlker Mataracı; Mehmet Ali Yürük; Tanıl Özer; Ufuk Sayar; Ali Kemal Arslan; Uğur Ziyrek; Murat Yücel
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-06-05

9.  Early Clinical Results of Perceval Sutureless Aortic Valve in 139 Patients: Freeman Experience.

Authors:  Syed Saleem Mujtaba; Simon Ledingham; Asif Raza Shah; Stephen Clark; Thasee Pillay; Stephan Schueler
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb

10.  Sutureless aortic bioprosthesis replacement in elderly Asian patients with aortic stenosis: Experience in a single institution.

Authors:  Chun-Yu Lin; Hsiu-An Lee; Pyng-Jing Lin; Chun-Li Wang; Kuo-Chun Hung; Feng-Chun Tsai
Journal:  Biomed J       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 4.910

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.