Literature DB >> 25106682

Aortic valve replacement and concomitant procedures with the Perceval valve: results of European trials.

Malakh Shrestha1, Thierry A Folliguet2, Steffen Pfeiffer3, Bart Meuris4, Thierry Carrel5, Matthias Bechtel6, Willem J Flameng4, Theodor Fischlein3, François Laborde2, Axel Haverich7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Perceval (Sorin Group, Milan, Italy) is a self-anchoring sutureless aortic valve prosthesis. We report the short- to midterm results of combined aortic valve replacement (AVR) with concomitant procedures in elderly patients undergoing operation as part of 3 consecutive prospective multicenter European studies.
METHODS: From April 2007 to February 2013, 243 patients (mean age, 79.7 ± 5.1 years; female patients, 61%; median EuroSCORE, 9%) underwent AVR with concomitant procedures. The concomitant procedures were coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (182 cases), septal myectomy (21 cases), CABG + other procedures (18 cases), and 22 other procedures. Primary and secondary end points included implant feasibility and safety (for mortality and morbidity) and efficacy (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class improvement and hemodynamic results) of the prosthesis at the different follow-up periods. Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed for survival analysis.
RESULTS: Mean aortic cross-clamp and extracorporeal circulation (ECC) times were 50.7 ± 22.8 minutes and 78.9 ± 32.3 minutes, respectively. Thirty-day mortality was 2.1%. Mean postoperative gradient and effective orifice area were 10.1 ± 4.7 mm Hg and 1.5 ± 0.4 cm(2) and 8.9 ± 5.6 mm Hg and 1.6 ± 0.4 cm(2), respectively, at 1 year. There were early explantations, 4 of which resulted from paravalvular leaks. One additional valve explantation resulted from aortic root bleeding, probably caused by excessively extensive decalcification. In the late period, there was 1 mild paravalvular leak and no intravalvular insufficiency. No migration, dislodgement, or degeneration of the valve occurred during follow-up. Median follow-up was 444 days.
CONCLUSIONS: These trials confirm the safety and efficacy of the Perceval sutureless aortic valve, especially in elderly patients requiring AVR + concomitant procedures. In this patient group, sutureless valves may be advantageous compared to transcatheter valve implantations as concomitant procedures other than percutaneous coronary artery angioplasty are not always possible in the latter.
Copyright © 2014 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25106682     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.05.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  25 in total

1.  Minimally Invasive Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement With the Perceval S Bioprosthesis Through Ministernotomy: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Krishan Ramsaransing; Vikash Hindori; Athiná Kougioumtzoglou; Abdullah Kaya; Eva Verbeek
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-10-28

2.  Intraoperative displacement of a Perceval sutureless prosthesis.

Authors:  Giosuè Falcetta; Clemente Pascarella; Pietro Bertini; Stefano Pratali; Uberto Bortolotti
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-05-31

3.  Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement International Registry (SU-AVR-IR): design and rationale from the International Valvular Surgery Study Group (IVSSG).

Authors:  Marco Di Eusanio; Kevin Phan; Denis Bouchard; Thierry P Carrel; Otto E Dapunt; Roberto Di Bartolomeo; Harald C Eichstaedt; Theodor Fischlein; Thierry Folliguet; Borut Gersak; Mattia Glauber; Axel Haverich; Martin Misfeld; Peter J Oberwalder; Giuseppe Santarpino; Malakh Lal Shrestha; Marco Solinas; Marco Vola; Francesco Alamanni; Alberto Albertini; Gopal Bhatnagar; Michel Carrier; Stephen Clark; Federic Collart; Utz Kappert; Alfred Kocher; Bart Meuris; Carmelo Mignosa; Ahmed Ouda; Marc Pelletier; Parwis Baradaran Rahmanian; David Reineke; Kevin Teoh; Giovanni Troise; Emmanuel Villa; Thorsten Wahlers; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-03

Review 4.  Sutureless aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Marco Di Eusanio; Kevin Phan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-03

Review 5.  Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement using the Perceval S sutureless valve.

Authors:  Martin Misfeld
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-03

6.  Hospital cost savings and other advantages of sutureless vs stented aortic valves for intermediate-risk elderly patients.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Minami; Sarah Sainte; Herbert De Praetere; Filip Rega; Willem Flameng; Peter Verbrugghe; Bart Meuris
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 7.  Ten-year experience with the Perceval S sutureless prosthesis: lessons learned and future perspectives.

Authors:  Vincent Chauvette; Amine Mazine; Denis Bouchard
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2018-05-03

8.  Early results of the Sorin® Perceval S sutureless valve: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Karan Sian; Sheila Li; Daneish Selvakumar; Ross Mejia
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Sutureless versus Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement: Outcomes in 70 High-Risk Patients Undergoing Concomitant Cardiac Procedures.

Authors:  Muhammet Onur Hanedan; Mehmet Ali Yuruk; Ali Ihsan Parlar; Ugur Ziyrek; Ali Kemal Arslan; Ufuk Sayar; Ilker Mataraci
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2018-02-01

10.  Conventional versus rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement: a single-centre comparison between the Edwards Magna valve and its rapid-deployment successor.

Authors:  Martin Andreas; Stephanie Wallner; Andreas Habertheuer; Claus Rath; Martin Schauperl; Thomas Binder; Dietrich Beitzke; Raphael Rosenhek; Christian Loewe; Dominik Wiedemann; Alfred Kocher; Guenther Laufer
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-03-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.