Literature DB >> 25296456

Postoperative conduction disorders after implantation of the self-expandable sutureless Perceval S bioprosthesis.

Astrid G M van Boxtel, Patrick Houthuizen, Mohamed A Soliman Hamad, Jelena Sjatskig, Erwin Tan, Frits W Prinzen, Albert H M van Straten.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Minimally invasive techniques for aortic valve replacement (AVR) have been developed as an alternative to conventional AVR for patients with high operative risk. Yet, these techniques are still associated with an increased risk of postoperative conduction disorders. The study aim was to identify the incidence and fate of postoperative conduction disorders in patients undergoing sutureless (SU) AVR with the Perceval S bioprosthesis.
METHODS: In this observational study, patients who underwent SU AVR with the Perceval S prosthesis at the Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, were analyzed. Electrocardiograms (ECGs) recorded at baseline, within 24 h postoperatively, before hospital discharge and at follow up were collected by reviewing patients' records. The ECGs were analyzed by two independent investigators to record QRS-duration and conduction disorders.
RESULTS: All patients (n = 31) who underwent implantation of the Perceval S bioprosthesis between September 2010 and September 2012 were included. At baseline, three patients (9.7%) had preexisting left bundle branch block (LBBB), and one patient (3.2%) had a permanent pacemaker (PPM). New-onset LBBB developed in 11 patients (39.3%), and was transient in three patients (10.7%). Postoperatively, four patients (13.3%) required PPM implantation because of total atrioventricular block; all of these patients had either pre-existing LBBB (n = 1) or new LBBB (n = 3).
CONCLUSION: Sutureless AVR with the Perceval S bioprosthesis was frequently complicated by new LBBB, which was persistent in the majority of patients. A relatively high incidence of postoperative PPM implantation was also observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25296456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis        ISSN: 0966-8519


  7 in total

Review 1.  Sutureless aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Marco Di Eusanio; Kevin Phan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-03

Review 2.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation-induced left bundle branch block: causes and consequences.

Authors:  Thomas T Poels; Patrick Houthuizen; Leen A F M Van Garsse; Jos G Maessen; Peter de Jaegere; Frits W Prinzen
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Sutureless aortic valve replacement with Perceval bioprosthesis: are there predicting factors for postoperative pacemaker implantation?

Authors:  Ferdinand Vogt; Steffen Pfeiffer; Angelo Maria Dell'Aquila; Theodor Fischlein; Giuseppe Santarpino
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-11-27

Review 4.  Episodic Left Bundle Branch Block-A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.

Authors:  George Bazoukis; Konstantinos Tsimos; Panagiotis Korantzopoulos
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.468

5.  A pooled analysis of pacemaker implantation after Perceval sutureless aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Marco Moscarelli; Giuseppe Santarpino; Thanos Athanasiou; Pasquale Mastroroberto; Khalil Fattouch; Giuseppe Nasso; Giuseppe Speziale
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-10-04

6.  Aortic valve replacement with sutureless and rapid deployment aortic valve prostheses.

Authors:  Paolo Berretta; Marco Di Eusanio
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 7.  Sutureless aortic valve with supracoronary ascending aortic replacement as an alternative strategy for composite graft replacement in elderly patients.

Authors:  J R Olsthoorn; K Y Lam; F Akca; N M A J Timmermans; M E S H Tan
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 2.380

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.