Literature DB >> 28864981

Technical aspects of acquiring and measuring myocardial blood flow: Method, technique, and QA.

John R Votaw1, René R Sevag Packard2,3,4.   

Abstract

Measuring absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF) is becoming a common aid for diagnosing patients suspected to have coronary artery disease. An MBF study, however, requires a scanner with high count rate capability, is more susceptible to artifacts, and is much more technically involved than static imaging, which leads to a greater risk of artifactual results contaminating the final result. This technical note gives the reader an introductory understanding of the method for calculating MBF. It then describes the scanning protocol, potential pitfalls and how to recognize them, and quality control steps that should be taken to avoid basing a clinical decision on possibly inaccurate flow information.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary blood flow; Coronary flow reserve; Image quality; PET

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28864981      PMCID: PMC6443413          DOI: 10.1007/s12350-017-1049-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  5 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Precision and accuracy of clinical quantification of myocardial blood flow by dynamic PET: A technical perspective.

Authors:  Jonathan B Moody; Benjamin C Lee; James R Corbett; Edward P Ficaro; Venkatesh L Murthy
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  "Upward creep" of the heart: a frequent source of false-positive reversible defects during thallium-201 stress-redistribution SPECT.

Authors:  J Friedman; K Van Train; J Maddahi; A Rozanski; F Prigent; J Bietendorf; A Waxman; D S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 4.  Cardiac PET imaging for the detection and monitoring of coronary artery disease and microvascular health.

Authors:  Thomas H Schindler; Heinrich R Schelbert; Alessandra Quercioli; Vasken Dilsizian
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-06

Review 5.  Cardiac PET perfusion tracers: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Jamshid Maddahi; René R S Packard
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.446

  5 in total
  9 in total

1.  Myocardial Creep: we can now look it in the eye without framewise PET-CT registration for myocardial blood flow quantification.

Authors:  Elia von Felten; Andreas A Giannopoulos
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Relationship of 82Rb PET territorial myocardial asynchrony to arterial stenosis.

Authors:  Andrew Van Tosh; John R Votaw; C David Cooke; J Jane Cao; Christopher J Palestro; Kenneth J Nichols
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Motion Correction and Its Impact on Absolute Myocardial Blood Flow Measures with PET.

Authors:  Marina Piccinelli; John R Votaw; Ernest V Garcia
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Technical aspects of cardiac PET/MRI.

Authors:  Atsuro Masuda; Ayaka Nemoto; Yasuchika Takeishi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Clinical implications of compromised 82Rb PET data acquisition.

Authors:  Andrew Van Tosh; J Jane Cao; John R Votaw; C David Cooke; Christopher J Palestro; Kenneth J Nichols
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 3.872

6.  Early onset of left ventricular regional asynchrony in arteries with sub-clinical stenosis.

Authors:  Andrew Van Tosh; John R Votaw; C David Cooke; J Jane Cao; Christopher J Palestro; Kenneth J Nichols
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  EANM procedural guidelines for PET/CT quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Roberto Sciagrà; Mark Lubberink; Fabien Hyafil; Antti Saraste; Riemer H J A Slart; Denis Agostini; Carmela Nappi; Panagiotis Georgoulias; Jan Bucerius; Christoph Rischpler; Hein J Verberne
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Myocardial creep-induced misalignment artifacts in PET/MR myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Elia von Felten; Georgios Benetos; Dimitri Patriki; Dominik C Benz; Georgios P Rampidis; Andreas A Giannopoulos; Adam Bakula; Christoph Gräni; Aju P Pazhenkottil; Catherine Gebhard; Tobias A Fuchs; Philipp A Kaufmann; Ronny R Buechel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-07-18       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Dynamic cardiac PET motion correction using 3D normalized gradient fields in patients and phantom simulations.

Authors:  Jonathon A Nye; Marina Piccinelli; Doyeon Hwang; Charles David Cooke; Jin Chul Paeng; Joo Myung Lee; Sang-Geon Cho; Russell Folks; Hee-Seung Bom; Bon-Kwon Koo; Ernest V Garcia
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 4.506

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.