Literature DB >> 31591684

Does maternal obesity explain trends in caesarean section rates? Evidence from a large Irish maternity hospital.

Aoife Brick1, Richard Layte2, Aoife McKeating3, Sharon R Sheehan4, Michael J Turner3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A feature of contemporary obstetrics in wealthy countries has been both the continuing increase in caesarean section (CS) rates and the emergence of high levels of maternal obesity. AIMS: The purpose of this study was to examine whether the increasing CS rate in a large university maternity hospital was attributable in part to maternal obesity.
METHODS: We studied all women who delivered a baby weighing ≥ 500 g from 2009 to 2014 in one of the largest maternity hospitals in Europe. Logistic regression techniques were employed to examine the contribution of trends in maternal BMI on the prevalence of CS.
RESULTS: Obese women were more likely to be delivered by CS in 2014 than in 2009. Multivariate analysis shows that the increase in CS rates could not be explained by changes in obesity levels in either nulliparas or multiparas. The increase in CS rates during the 6 years was strongly associated with advancing maternal age, particularly for nulliparas.
CONCLUSIONS: The study found that although the prevalence of being overweight or obese changed little over the period, the odds of having a CS if a woman is obese have increased for multiparas. For nulliparas, increasing CS rates were found to be strongly associated with an increase in maternal age over the period which is important because of the evidence that Irish women are choosing to defer having their first baby until later in life.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body mass index; Caesarean section; Maternal age; Obesity

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31591684     DOI: 10.1007/s11845-019-02095-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-1265            Impact factor:   1.568


  17 in total

1.  Trends in risk factors for caesarean sections in France between 1981 and 1995: lessons for reducing the rates in the future.

Authors:  P Guihard; B Blondel
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.531

2.  Changes in maternal characteristics and obstetric practice and recent increases in primary cesarean delivery.

Authors:  K S Joseph; David C Young; Linda Dodds; Colleen M O'Connell; Victoria M Allen; Sujata Chandra; Alexander C Allen
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Body Mass Index (BMI) in women booking for antenatal care: comparison between selfreported and digital measurements.

Authors:  Chro Fattah; Nadine Farah; Fiona O'Toole; Sinead Barry; Bernard Stuart; Michael J Turner
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 2.435

4.  Trends in maternal obesity incidence rates, demographic predictors, and health inequalities in 36,821 women over a 15-year period.

Authors:  N Heslehurst; L J Ells; H Simpson; A Batterham; J Wilkinson; C D Summerbell
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  The risk of caesarean section in obese women analysed by parity.

Authors:  Vicky O'Dwyer; Nadine Farah; Chro Fattah; Norah O'Connor; Mairead M Kennelly; Michael J Turner
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 2.435

6.  International variation in caesarean section rates and maternal obesity.

Authors:  V O'Dwyer; R Layte; C O'Connor; N Farah; M M Kennelly; M J Turner
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.246

7.  Extreme obesity and postcesarean maternal complications.

Authors:  David M Stamilio; Christina M Scifres
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys.

Authors:  Joshua P Vogel; Ana Pilar Betrán; Nadia Vindevoghel; João Paulo Souza; Maria Regina Torloni; Jun Zhang; Özge Tunçalp; Rintaro Mori; Naho Morisaki; Eduardo Ortiz-Panozo; Bernardo Hernandez; Ricardo Pérez-Cuevas; Zahida Qureshi; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Marleen Temmerman
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 26.763

9.  Differences in nulliparous caesarean section rates across models of care: a decomposition analysis.

Authors:  Aoife Brick; Richard Layte; Anne Nolan; Michael J Turner
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Contribution of prepregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain to caesarean birth in Canada.

Authors:  Susie Dzakpasu; John Fahey; Russell S Kirby; Suzanne C Tough; Beverley Chalmers; Maureen I Heaman; Sharon Bartholomew; Anne Biringer; Elizabeth K Darling; Lily S Lee; Sarah D McDonald
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.007

View more
  1 in total

1.  Epidural analgesia in the obese obstetric patient: a retrospective and comparative study with non-obese patients at a tertiary hospital.

Authors:  Claudia Cuesta González-Tascón; Elena Gredilla Díaz; Itsaso Losantos García
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-04-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.