Benjamin Hon Kei Yip1, Helen Leonard2,3, Sarah Stock1,4,5, Camilla Stoltenberg5,6, Richard W Francis2,3, Mika Gissler7,8, Raz Gross9,10, Diana Schendel11,12,13, Sven Sandin1,14. 1. Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 2. Telethon Kids Institute. 3. Centre for Child Health Research, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia. 4. MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh Queen's Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh, UK. 5. Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway. 6. Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. 7. National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland. 8. Department of Child Psychiatry, Turku University and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland. 9. Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. 10. Division of Psychiatry, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel. 11. Department of Public Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. 12. Department of Economics and Business, National Centre for Register-based Research, Aarhus, Denmark. 13. Lundbeck Foundation Initiative for Integrative Psychiatric Research, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. 14. Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA and.
Abstract
Background: The positive association between caesarean section (CS) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) may be attributed to preterm delivery. However, due to lack of statistical power, no previous study thoroughly examined this association across gestational age. Moreover, most studies did not differentiate between emergency and planned CS. Methods: Using population-based registries of four Nordic countries and Western Australia, our study population included 4 987 390 singletons surviving their first year of life, which included 671 646 CS deliveries and 31 073 ASD children. We used logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for CS, adjusted for gestational age, site, maternal age and birth year. Stratified analyses were conducted by both gestational age subgroups and by week of gestation. We compared emergency versus planned CS to investigate their potential difference in the risk of ASD. Results: Compared with vaginal delivery, the overall adjusted OR for ASD in CS delivery was 1.26 (95% CI 1.22-1.30). Stratified ORs were 1.25 (1.15-1.37), 1.16 (1.09-1.23), 1.34 (1.28-1.40) and 1.17 (1.04-1.30) for subgroups of gestational weeks 26-36, 37-38, 39-41 and 42-44, respectively. CS was significantly associated with risk of ASD for each week of gestation, from week 36 to 42, consistently across study sites (OR ranged 1.16-1.38). There was no statistically significant difference between emergency and planned CS in the risk of ASD. Conclusion: Across the five countries, emergency or planned CS is consistently associated with a modest increased risk of ASD from gestational weeks 36 to 42 when compared with vaginal delivery.
Background: The positive association between caesarean section (CS) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) may be attributed to preterm delivery. However, due to lack of statistical power, no previous study thoroughly examined this association across gestational age. Moreover, most studies did not differentiate between emergency and planned CS. Methods: Using population-based registries of four Nordic countries and Western Australia, our study population included 4 987 390 singletons surviving their first year of life, which included 671 646 CS deliveries and 31 073 ASDchildren. We used logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for CS, adjusted for gestational age, site, maternal age and birth year. Stratified analyses were conducted by both gestational age subgroups and by week of gestation. We compared emergency versus planned CS to investigate their potential difference in the risk of ASD. Results: Compared with vaginal delivery, the overall adjusted OR for ASD in CS delivery was 1.26 (95% CI 1.22-1.30). Stratified ORs were 1.25 (1.15-1.37), 1.16 (1.09-1.23), 1.34 (1.28-1.40) and 1.17 (1.04-1.30) for subgroups of gestational weeks 26-36, 37-38, 39-41 and 42-44, respectively. CS was significantly associated with risk of ASD for each week of gestation, from week 36 to 42, consistently across study sites (OR ranged 1.16-1.38). There was no statistically significant difference between emergency and planned CS in the risk of ASD. Conclusion: Across the five countries, emergency or planned CS is consistently associated with a modest increased risk of ASD from gestational weeks 36 to 42 when compared with vaginal delivery.
Authors: Kristjana Einarsdóttir; Stephen Ball; Gavin Pereira; Christopher Griffin; Peter Jacoby; Nick de Klerk; Helen Leonard; Fiona J Stanley Journal: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 3.980
Authors: Maria G Dominguez-Bello; Elizabeth K Costello; Monica Contreras; Magda Magris; Glida Hidalgo; Noah Fierer; Rob Knight Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-06-21 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Laura A Schieve; Lin H Tian; Jon Baio; Kristin Rankin; Deborah Rosenberg; Lisa Wiggins; Matthew J Maenner; Marshalyn Yeargin-Allsopp; Maureen Durkin; Catherine Rice; Lydia King; Russell S Kirby; Martha S Wingate; Owen Devine Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2014-01-15 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Eileen A Curran; Ali S Khashan; Christina Dalman; Louise C Kenny; John F Cryan; Timothy G Dinan; Patricia M Kearney Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2016-04-10 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Natasha Nassar; Glenys Dixon; Jenny Bourke; Carol Bower; Emma Glasson; Nick de Klerk; Helen Leonard Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2009-09-07 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Simon G Gregory; Rebecca Anthopolos; Claire E Osgood; Chad A Grotegut; Marie Lynn Miranda Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Amanda T Langridge; Emma J Glasson; Natasha Nassar; Peter Jacoby; Craig Pennell; Ronald Hagan; Jenny Bourke; Helen Leonard; Fiona J Stanley Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-01-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Alexandra Castillo-Ruiz; Morgan Mosley; Andrew J Jacobs; Yarely C Hoffiz; Nancy G Forger Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-10-15 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Susan A Korrick; Juliette C Madan; Hannah E Laue; Margaret R Karagas; Modupe O Coker; David C Bellinger; Emily R Baker Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2021-11-04 Impact factor: 3.953
Authors: Tianyang Zhang; Anna Sidorchuk; Laura Sevilla-Cermeño; Alba Vilaplana-Pérez; Zheng Chang; Henrik Larsson; David Mataix-Cols; Lorena Fernández de la Cruz Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2019-08-02