Literature DB >> 30979600

Making cesarean delivery SAFE in low- and middle-income countries.

Margo S Harrison1, Robert L Goldenberg2.   

Abstract

Cesarean birth (CB) rates are rising, globally. The global burden of CB is having a mixed effect on pregnancy outcomes and requires significant clinical and economic resources. The context of CB care in low- and middle-income countries is further complicated by barriers to facility-based care itself, followed by issues with quality and delivery of care in these resource-limited settings. The objective of this commentary is to propose an original, new, flexible, comprehensive care model for delivering SAFE cesarean delivery care in very low-resource settings. This model, the SAFEmodel for cesarean delivery care in low- and middle-income countries, developed by the authors, does not assume the current care model is working. It does not assume that even traditional hospital settings are what is needed to solve the problem of delivering high-quality, easily accessible CB care in the most remote and geographically isolated communities. The novel model promotes a decentralized care program that brings emergency obstetric care to women instead of the converse through four concepts: the care should be cloSe (community-based), it should be very dedicated to Action (transfer of care), it should be Focused on and highly specific to labor and delivery (cesarean birth center), and finally, it should be committed to high-quality care through iterative Evidence-based quality improvement programming and data collection.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cesarean birth; Facility-based care; Low- and middle-income countries; Quality; Safety

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30979600      PMCID: PMC6591105          DOI: 10.1053/j.semperi.2019.03.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Perinatol        ISSN: 0146-0005            Impact factor:   3.300


  22 in total

1.  Relationship Between Cesarean Delivery Rate and Maternal and Neonatal Mortality.

Authors:  George Molina; Thomas G Weiser; Stuart R Lipsitz; Micaela M Esquivel; Tarsicio Uribe-Leitz; Tej Azad; Neel Shah; Katherine Semrau; William R Berry; Atul A Gawande; Alex B Haynes
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Helain J Landy; D Ware Branch; Ronald Burkman; Shoshana Haberman; Kimberly D Gregory; Christos G Hatjis; Mildred M Ramirez; Jennifer L Bailit; Victor H Gonzalez-Quintero; Judith U Hibbard; Matthew K Hoffman; Michelle Kominiarek; Lee A Learman; Paul Van Veldhuisen; James Troendle; Uma M Reddy
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  The influence of surgical volume on morbidity and mortality of radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Sharyn N Lewin; Israel Deutsch; William M Burke; Xuming Sun; Thomas J Herzog
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  A prospective study of maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes in the setting of cesarean section in low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Margo S Harrison; Omrana Pasha; Sarah Saleem; Sumera Ali; Elwyn Chomba; Waldemar A Carlo; Ana L Garces; Nancy F Krebs; K Michael Hambidge; Shivaprasad S Goudar; Bhala Kodkany; Sangappa Dhaded; Richard J Derman; Archana Patel; Patricia L Hibberd; Fabian Esamai; Edward A Liechty; Janet L Moore; Dennis Wallace; Elizabeth M Mcclure; Menachem Miodovnik; Marion Koso-Thomas; Jose Belizan; Antoinette K Tshefu; Melissa Bauserman; Robert L Goldenberg
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  Cesarean delivery as a marker for obstetric quality.

Authors:  Kelly Gibson; Jennifer L Bailit
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.190

6.  Cesarean delivery outcomes from the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Africa.

Authors:  Archana Shah; Bukola Fawole; James Machoki M'imunya; Faouzi Amokrane; Idi Nafiou; Jean-José Wolomby; Kidza Mugerwa; Isilda Neves; Rosemary Nguti; Marius Kublickas; Matthews Mathai
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2009-09-27       Impact factor: 3.561

7.  Hospital variation in maternal complications following caesarean delivery in the United States: 2006-2012.

Authors:  L A Moroz; J D Wright; C V Ananth; A M Friedman
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 8.  Too far to walk: maternal mortality in context.

Authors:  S Thaddeus; D Maine
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys.

Authors:  Joshua P Vogel; Ana Pilar Betrán; Nadia Vindevoghel; João Paulo Souza; Maria Regina Torloni; Jun Zhang; Özge Tunçalp; Rintaro Mori; Naho Morisaki; Eduardo Ortiz-Panozo; Bernardo Hernandez; Ricardo Pérez-Cuevas; Zahida Qureshi; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Marleen Temmerman
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 26.763

10.  Surgical task shifting in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Kathryn Chu; Peter Rosseel; Pierre Gielis; Nathan Ford
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  1 in total

1.  Twenty-five years after its publication, innovative solutions to the three delays model are essential.

Authors:  Margo S Harrison; Teklemariam Yarinbab; Tewodros Liyew; Ephrem Kirub; Biruk Teshome; Margaret Muldrow
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 3.561

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.