Raymond Morales1, Lauren Rodriguez2, Angad Singh3, Erin Stratta4, Lydia Mendoza5, Melissa A Valerio6, Monica Vela7,8. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Kaiser Permamente, Oakland, CA, USA. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Emergency Medicine at Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA. 3. Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. 4. Contra Costa Regional Medical Center, Martinez, CA, USA. 5. University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA. 6. Health Promotion and Behavioral Science, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston , San Antonio Regional Campus, San Antonio, TX, USA. 7. Department of Medicine, University Of Chicago Pritzker School Of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. mvela@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu. 8. Biological Sciences Learning Center, Suite 104, 924 East 57th St, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA. mvela@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) may be at risk for medical errors and worse health outcomes. Language concordance between patient and provider has been shown to improve health outcomes for Spanish-speaking patients. Nearly 40 % of Hispanics, a growing population in the United States, are categorized as having limited English proficiency. Many medical schools have incorporated a medical Spanish curriculum to prepare students for clinical encounters with LEP patients. OBJECTIVE: To describe the current state of medical Spanish curricula at United States medical schools. METHODS: The Latino Medical Student Association distributed an e-mail survey comprising 39 items to deans from each U.S. medical school from July 2012 through July 2014. This study was IRB-exempt. RESULTS: Eighty-three percent (110/132) of the U.S. medical schools completed the survey. Sixty-six percent (73/110) of these schools reported offering a medical Spanish curriculum. In addition, of schools with no curriculum, 32 % (12/37) planned to incorporate the curriculum within the next two years. Most existing curricula were elective, not eligible for course credit, and taught by faculty or students. Teaching modalities included didactic instruction, role play, and immersion activities. Schools with the curriculum reported that the diverse patient populations in their respective service areas and/or student interest drove course development. Barriers to implementing the curriculum included lack of time in students' schedules, overly heterogeneous student language skill levels, and a lack of financial resources. Few schools reported the use of validated instruments to measure language proficiency after completion of the curriculum. CONCLUSIONS: Growing LEP patient populations and medical student interest have driven the implementation of medical Spanish curricula at U.S. medical schools, and more schools have plans to incorporate this curriculum in the near future. Studies are needed to reveal best practices for developing and evaluating the curriculum.
BACKGROUND:Patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) may be at risk for medical errors and worse health outcomes. Language concordance between patient and provider has been shown to improve health outcomes for Spanish-speaking patients. Nearly 40 % of Hispanics, a growing population in the United States, are categorized as having limited English proficiency. Many medical schools have incorporated a medical Spanish curriculum to prepare students for clinical encounters with LEP patients. OBJECTIVE: To describe the current state of medical Spanish curricula at United States medical schools. METHODS: The Latino Medical Student Association distributed an e-mail survey comprising 39 items to deans from each U.S. medical school from July 2012 through July 2014. This study was IRB-exempt. RESULTS: Eighty-three percent (110/132) of the U.S. medical schools completed the survey. Sixty-six percent (73/110) of these schools reported offering a medical Spanish curriculum. In addition, of schools with no curriculum, 32 % (12/37) planned to incorporate the curriculum within the next two years. Most existing curricula were elective, not eligible for course credit, and taught by faculty or students. Teaching modalities included didactic instruction, role play, and immersion activities. Schools with the curriculum reported that the diverse patient populations in their respective service areas and/or student interest drove course development. Barriers to implementing the curriculum included lack of time in students' schedules, overly heterogeneous student language skill levels, and a lack of financial resources. Few schools reported the use of validated instruments to measure language proficiency after completion of the curriculum. CONCLUSIONS: Growing LEP patient populations and medical student interest have driven the implementation of medical Spanish curricula at U.S. medical schools, and more schools have plans to incorporate this curriculum in the near future. Studies are needed to reveal best practices for developing and evaluating the curriculum.
Entities:
Keywords:
Disparities; Hispanic health; Limited English proficiency; Medical Spanish curriculum; Medical interpreters
Authors: Mary Catherine Beach; Eboni G Price; Tiffany L Gary; Karen A Robinson; Aysegul Gozu; Ana Palacio; Carole Smarth; Mollie W Jenckes; Carolyn Feuerstein; Eric B Bass; Neil R Powe; Lisa A Cooper Journal: Med Care Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Alicia Fernandez; Dean Schillinger; Kevin Grumbach; Anne Rosenthal; Anita L Stewart; Frances Wang; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Taylor A Vega; Alec G Contag; Erin Urbanowicz; Anthony Sanchez; Juan Carlos Martinez; Amy Garcia; Alex Ortega-Loayza Journal: Med Sci Educ Date: 2021-02-16
Authors: Tiffany M Shin; Karol Hardin; Dennis Johnston; Evan Rajadhyaksha; Lisa C Diamond; Rocío Chang; Glenn A Martínez; Pilar Ortega Journal: Med Sci Educ Date: 2021-06-02
Authors: Pilar Ortega; Nicolás O Francone; María Paola Santos; Jorge A Girotti; Tiffany M Shin; Nielufar Varjavand; Yoon Soo Park Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-03-29 Impact factor: 6.473