| Literature DB >> 25855386 |
Cesar Orsini1, Phillip Evans2, Oscar Jerez3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Internalization of students' motivation towards an intrinsic form is associated with increased interest, commitment, learning, and satisfaction with education. Self-Determination theory postulates that intrinsic motivation and autonomous forms of self-regulation are the desired type of motivation; as they have been associated with deep learning, better performance and well-being. It claims three basic psychological needs have to be satisfied in order to achieve intrinsic motivation. These are the needs for autonomy, competence and relatedness. This study aims to provide a review on how these basic psychological needs are encouraged in undergraduate students so they can be transferred to the clinical teaching environment.Entities:
Keywords: Achievement; Learning; Motivation; Personal autonomy; Personal satisfaction
Year: 2015 PMID: 25855386 PMCID: PMC4397857 DOI: 10.3352/jeehp.2015.12.8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Educ Eval Health Prof ISSN: 1975-5937
Setting the scope of the search: inclusion and exclusion criteria
| Inclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria |
|---|---|
| 1. Studies/reviews/meta-analysis focusing on the encouragement of undergraduate students' intrinsic motivation. | 1. Studies not empirical in nature like view- points, editorials, papers expressing opinion and books. |
| 2. Studies/reviews/meta-analysis within Health Professions Education or General Higher Education. | 2. Studies on populations other than undergraduate students or teachers in health professions education or General Higher Education. |
| 3. Quantitative research studies with well-formulated definitions, operationalization of concepts and analysis of data. | 3. Studies not referring to motivation in higher education. |
| 4. Qualitative research studies with well-defined concepts, reliable methods, well-reasoned conclusions and analysis. | 4. Studies focusing on motivation in education for specific issues not regarding teaching. |
| 5. Articles available in English and Spanish Language, published from year 1993. | 5. Studies focused on instrument construction/validation. |
Identifying and expanding essential concepts (Medline Search Strategy)
| • |
| - |
| - |
| • |
| - |
| - |
| • |
| - |
| - |
| • |
Fig. 1.Summary of literature search and review process.
Summary of studies on the encouragement of intrinsic motivation in undergraduate students
| Author(s) (years, country) | Research topics | Type of study | Sample | Data collection method | Data analysis | Selected findings & comments | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ryan & Niemiec, (2009, USA ) [ | Overview SDT and applications to educational practice. | Literature review | Purposive sample of articles | Electronic databases and hand search of relevant literature | Thematic analysis | ||
| Kusurkar et al. (20ll, The Netherlands) [ | Autonomy-supportive teaching and practical tips for medical teachers. | Literature review | Purposive sample, SDT related Literature | Electronic databases and hand search of relevant literature | Thematic analysis | ||
| Benson, Cohen, & Buskist (2005, USA) [ | Rapport: student attitudes and proacademic behaviours, and Instructor behaviours contributing to it. | Mixed methods | l66 students | Questionnaire-based (close/ open questions) | Statistical analysis, (Frequencies, t-test, ANOVA) and content analysis | Rapport-inducing teachers are likely to have students who attend class, pay attention, enjoy subject matter and engage in proacademic behaviours. | |
| Ten Cate et al. (20ll, The Netherlands) [ | Practical applications of SDT in medical education | Literature review | Purposive sample SDT related literature | Electronic databases and hand search of relevant literature | Thematic analysis | ||
| Davies et al. (20l2, UK) [ | Student's views and perceptions of clinical teaching | Mixed methods | Three cohorts of l52 final-year students | Questionnaire-based (online/paper-open/ closed questions) | Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis | - A friendly, non-threatening teaching environment is perceived by students to be a good learning environment. | |
| - Semi-structured interviews | - Students appreciate the time and space to take ownership of their learning. | ||||||
| - Focus groups | - Learning experience is enhanced through reflective practice and feedback. | ||||||
| Bengtsson et al. (20l0, Sweden) [ | What students consider important for their motivation to attain knowledge | Qualitative | 3l students | Focus group with semi-structured questions | Content analysis | Dedicated teachers giving performance feedback, discussions in different forms and choices of learning and assessment methods enhance enthusiasm and learning. | |
| Hodgins et al. (l996, Canada) [ | Reflective autonomy and interpersonal experiences with parents and with peers | Quantitative | l53 students | Questionnaire-based | Statistical analysis (coefficient of correlation) | Reflective autonomy was significantly related to more positive and honest naturally occurring interaction and positive relatedness. | |
| Brewer & Burgess (2005, USA) [ | Teachers' role in motivating students to come to class. | Quantitative | 156 students | Questionnaire-based | Statistical analysis (Descriptive, t-test, MANO-VA) | Teachers should maintain a positive attitude toward students, maintaining a flexible class environment and use a variety of alternative teaching methods to capture students' attention and curiosity. | |
| Williams, Saizow & Ryan (l999, USA) [ | Importance of SDT for medical education | Literature review | Purposive sample, SDT related literature | Electronic databases and hand search of relevant literature | Thematic analysis | ||
| Black & Deci (2000, USA) [ | Students' self-regulation and perceptions of their instructors' autonomy support | Quantitative | 137 students | Questionnaire-based | Statistical analysis (Descriptive, factor analysis, t-test, coefficient of correlations, Multiple regression, ANOVA) | Teachers should provide support for students' autonomy and active learning to improve their autonomous self-regulation, competence, enjoyment, and decrease anxiety. | |
| Boggiano et al. (l993, USA) [ | The effect of controlling strategies and restricted choice on students' performance | Quantitative | 117 Students | Questionnaire-based | Statistical analysis (Descriptive, ANOVA) | An "expert” teacher using controlling techniques undermines the nonexpert's perceptions of autonomy, sense of responsibility for process and performance. | |
| Beachboard et al. (2011, USA) [ | Feelings of relatedness and learning outcomes improvement | Quantitative | 2,000 records of NSSE survey | Questionnaire-based | Statistical analysis (Descriptive, t-test, linear and block entry regression) | Increased relatedness to peers and faculty and increased higher order thinking assignments are substantial predictors of educational outcomes relevant to literacy, critical thinking and job preparation | |
| Sheldon & Bettencourt (2002, USA) [ | Relation of need-satisfaction constructs and affect, intrinsic motivation and commitment | Quantitative | 134 Students | Questionnaire-based | Statistical analysis (Descriptive, regression and coefficient correlation) | Group inclusion predicted positive outcomes and may be the most important need to satisfy within group contexts | |
| Ciani et al. (2011, USA) [ | Particular achievement goal profiles of students and SDT | Quantitative | 184 students | Questionnaire-based | Statistical analysis (descriptive, correlation and comparative fit index | Teacher autonomy support buffered against the general decline in students' mastery-approach goals over the course of the semester and predicted initial self-determined motivation. | |
| Kaufman & Dodge (2009, USA) [ | Factors that influence relatedness and value in an academic setting | Quantitative | 222 students | Questionnaire-based | Statistical analysis (descriptive and linear regression) | Enhancing relatedness includes providing students with more choice in their curriculum and fostering a sense of mastery goals. Such improvements can be targeted at both the structural or policy level, as well as at the classroom level. | |
| Levesque et al. (2004, USA) [ | The relevance of the needs for autonomy and competence toward University | Quantitative | 1,289 students | Questionnaire-based | Statistical analysis (descriptive, covariance structure analysis) | Positive informational feedback and lower perceived pressure were positively associated with greater perceived autonomy and competence. |
Main themes for supporting intrinsic motivation and satisfying the three basic needs
| Supporting autonomy | Supporting competence | Supporting relatedness |
|---|---|---|
| Identify what students want | Provide optimal challenges | Respect students |
| Provide different learning approaches | ||
| Give value to uninteresting tasks | Provide structured guidance | |
| Promote active participation | Give emotional support | |
| Give choice | Value students work | |
| Give learning responsibility | Acknowledge students' expressions of negative effect | |
| Provide freedom | Give positive and constructive feedback | |
| Avoid external reward | Feedback |