Literature DB >> 25853369

Short-term Results of a Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Swedish Screening Program for Individuals at Risk for Pancreatic Cancer.

Marco Del Chiaro1, Caroline S Verbeke2, Nikolaos Kartalis3, Raffaella Pozzi Mucelli3, Peter Gustafsson4, Johan Hansson5, Stephan L Haas6, Ralf Segersvärd1, Åke Andren-Sandberg1, J-Matthias Löhr1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in Western countries. In approximately 10% of all patients with pancreatic cancer, it is possible to define a positive family history for pancreatic cancer or for one of the other related genetic syndromes. A screening program for individuals at risk is recommended; however, surveillance modalities have not been defined yet.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the short-term results of a prospective clinical surveillance program for individuals at risk for pancreatic cancer using a noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based screening protocol. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A prospective observational study of all patients with a genetic risk for developing pancreatic cancer who were referred to Karolinska University Hospital between January 1, 2010, and January 31, 2013, using an MRI-based surveillance program. All patients were investigated for the most common genetic mutations associated with pancreatic cancer. EXPOSURE: A noninvasive MRI-based screening protocol. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The ability of MRI to identify potential precancerous or early cancers in individuals at risk for pancreatic cancer.
RESULTS: Forty patients (24 women and 16 men) were enrolled. The mean age was 49.9 years. The mean length of follow-up was 12.9 months. The numbers of relatives affected by pancreatic cancer were 5 in 2 patients (5%), 4 in 5 patients (12.5%), 3 in 17 patients (42.5%), 2 in 14 patients (35%), and 1 in 2 patients (5%). In 4 patients (10%), a p16 mutation was found; in 3, a BRCA2 mutation (7.5%); and in 1, a BRCA1 mutation (2.5%). In 16 patients (40%), MRI revealed a pancreatic lesion: intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia (14 patients, 35%) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (2 patients, 5%). One patient had a synchronous intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Five patients (12.5%) required surgery (3 for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and 2 for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia), while the remaining 35 are under continued surveillance. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: During a median follow-up of approximately 1 year, pancreatic lesions were detected in 40% of the patients, of whom 5 underwent surgery. Although the study time was relatively short, the surveillance program in individuals at risk seems to be effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25853369     DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.3852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Surg        ISSN: 2168-6254            Impact factor:   14.766


  21 in total

1.  On pancreatic cancer screening by magnetic resonance imaging with the recent evidence by Del Chiaro and colleagues.

Authors:  Yì-Xiáng J Wáng; Jing-Shan Gong; Romaric Loffroy
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 2.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Riccardo De Robertis; Paolo Tinazzi Martini; Emanuele Demozzi; Flavia Dal Corso; Claudio Bassi; Paolo Pederzoli; Mirko D'Onofrio
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2015-10-28

Review 3.  Review of radiological screening programmes for breast, lung and pancreatic malignancy.

Authors:  Helena Barton; David Shatti; Charlotte Anne Jones; Mathuri Sakthithasan; Will W Loughborough
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-06

Review 4.  Surveillance for neoplasia in the pancreas.

Authors:  Kasper A Overbeek; Djuna L Cahen; Marcia Irene Canto; Marco J Bruno
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 3.043

Review 5.  Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer: Opportunities and Challenges.

Authors:  Aatur D Singhi; Eugene J Koay; Suresh T Chari; Anirban Maitra
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Genetic testing to guide screening for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Results of a microsimulation model.

Authors:  Mary Linton B Peters; Andrew Eckel; Anna Lietz; Claudia Seguin; Peter Mueller; Chin Hur; Pari V Pandharipande
Journal:  Pancreatology       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.977

7.  Methods and outcomes of screening for pancreatic adenocarcinoma in high-risk individuals.

Authors:  Gabriele Capurso; Marianna Signoretti; Roberto Valente; Urban Arnelo; Matthias Lohr; Jan-Werner Poley; Gianfranco Delle Fave; Marco Del Chiaro
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-07-25

Review 8.  Advances in Hereditary Colorectal and Pancreatic Cancers.

Authors:  Meghan L Underhill; Katharine A Germansky; Matthew B Yurgelun
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 3.393

Review 9.  Results of surveillance in individuals at high-risk of pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marianna Signoretti; Marco J Bruno; Giulia Zerboni; Jan-Werner Poley; Gianfranco Delle Fave; Gabriele Capurso
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 4.623

10.  Implications and issues related to familial pancreatic cancer: a cohort study of hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Martina Mughetti; Lucia Calculli; Anna Maria Chiesa; Federica Ciccarese; Odeta Rrusho; Raffaele Pezzilli
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.