BACKGROUND: Data on surveillance for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in high-risk individuals (HRIs) with "familial pancreatic cancer" (FPC) and specific syndromes are limited and heterogeneous. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of PDAC surveillance studies in HRIs. METHODS: Prevalence of solid/cystic pancreatic lesions and of lesions considered a successful target of surveillance (proven resectable PDAC and high-grade precursors) was pooled across studies. The rate of lesions diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and across different HRI groups was calculated. RESULTS: Sixteen studies incorporating 1588 HRIs were included. The pooled prevalence of pancreatic solid and cystic lesions was 5.8% and 20.2%, respectively. The pooled prevalence of patients with lesions considered a successful target of surveillance was 3.3%, being similar to EUS or MRI and varying across subgroups, being 3% in FPC, 4% in hereditary pancreatitis, 5% in familial melanoma, 6.3% in hereditary breast/ovarian cancer, and 12.2% in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. The pooled estimated rate of lesions considered a successful target of surveillance during follow-up was 5/1000 person-years. CONCLUSION: Surveillance programs identify successful target lesions in 3.3% of HRIs with a similar yield of EUS and MRI and an annual risk of 0.5%. A higher rate of target lesions was reported in HRIs with specific DNA mutations.
BACKGROUND: Data on surveillance for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in high-risk individuals (HRIs) with "familial pancreatic cancer" (FPC) and specific syndromes are limited and heterogeneous. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of PDAC surveillance studies in HRIs. METHODS: Prevalence of solid/cystic pancreatic lesions and of lesions considered a successful target of surveillance (proven resectable PDAC and high-grade precursors) was pooled across studies. The rate of lesions diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and across different HRI groups was calculated. RESULTS: Sixteen studies incorporating 1588 HRIs were included. The pooled prevalence of pancreatic solid and cystic lesions was 5.8% and 20.2%, respectively. The pooled prevalence of patients with lesions considered a successful target of surveillance was 3.3%, being similar to EUS or MRI and varying across subgroups, being 3% in FPC, 4% in hereditary pancreatitis, 5% in familial melanoma, 6.3% in hereditary breast/ovarian cancer, and 12.2% in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. The pooled estimated rate of lesions considered a successful target of surveillance during follow-up was 5/1000 person-years. CONCLUSION: Surveillance programs identify successful target lesions in 3.3% of HRIs with a similar yield of EUS and MRI and an annual risk of 0.5%. A higher rate of target lesions was reported in HRIs with specific DNA mutations.
Entities:
Keywords:
Pancreatic cancer; family history; meta-analysis; screening
Authors: Elizabeth C Verna; Caroline Hwang; Peter D Stevens; Heidrun Rotterdam; Stavros N Stavropoulos; Carolyn D Sy; Martin A Prince; Wendy K Chung; Robert L Fine; John A Chabot; Harold Frucht Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-09-28 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Marco Del Chiaro; Alessandro Zerbi; Gabriele Capurso; Giuseppe Zamboni; Patrick Maisonneuve; Silvano Presciuttini; Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono; Lucia Calculli; Massimo Falconi Journal: Dig Liver Dis Date: 2010-06-02 Impact factor: 4.088
Authors: Marco Del Chiaro; Caroline S Verbeke; Nikolaos Kartalis; Raffaella Pozzi Mucelli; Peter Gustafsson; Johan Hansson; Stephan L Haas; Ralf Segersvärd; Åke Andren-Sandberg; J-Matthias Löhr Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: J W Poley; I Kluijt; D J Gouma; F Harinck; A Wagner; C Aalfs; C H J van Eijck; A Cats; E J Kuipers; Y Nio; P Fockens; M J Bruno Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2009-06-02 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: P Langer; P H Kann; V Fendrich; N Habbe; M Schneider; M Sina; E P Slater; J T Heverhagen; T M Gress; M Rothmund; D K Bartsch Journal: Gut Date: 2009-05-25 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Thomas P Potjer; Ingrid Schot; Peter Langer; Johannes T Heverhagen; Martin N J M Wasser; Emily P Slater; Günter Klöppel; Hans M Morreau; Bert A Bonsing; Wouter H de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel; Mathias Bargello; Thomas M Gress; Hans F A Vasen; Detlef K Bartsch Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-11-21 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Kevin J Monahan; Nicola Bradshaw; Sunil Dolwani; Bianca Desouza; Malcolm G Dunlop; James E East; Mohammad Ilyas; Asha Kaur; Fiona Lalloo; Andrew Latchford; Matthew D Rutter; Ian Tomlinson; Huw J W Thomas; James Hill Journal: Gut Date: 2019-11-28 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Monica Consolandi; Carlo Martini; Michele Reni; Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono; Massimo Falconi; Guendalina Graffigna; Gabriele Capurso Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2020-04-30