Mary Linton B Peters1, Andrew Eckel2, Anna Lietz2, Claudia Seguin2, Peter Mueller2, Chin Hur3, Pari V Pandharipande4. 1. Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, USA. Electronic address: mbpeters@bidmc.harvard.edu. 2. Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA. 3. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Current Affiliation: Division of Gastroenterology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, USA. 4. Institute for Technology Assessment and Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: First-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have elevated PDAC risk, partially due to germline genetic variants. We evaluated the potential effectiveness of genetic testing to target MRI-based screening among FDRs. METHODS: We used a microsimulation model of PDAC, calibrated to Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data, to estimate the potential life expectancy (LE) gain of screening for each of the following groups of FDRs: individuals who test positive for each of eight variants associated with elevated PDAC risk (e.g., BRCA2, CDKN2A); individuals who test negative; and individuals who do not test. Screening was assumed to take place if LE gains were achievable. We simulated multiple screening approaches, defined by starting age and frequency. Sensitivity analysis evaluated changes in results given varying model assumptions. RESULTS: For women, 92% of mutation carriers had projected LE gains from screening for PDAC, if screening strategies (start age, frequency) were optimized. Among carriers, LE gains ranged from 0.1 days (ATM+ women screened once at age 70) to 510 days (STK11+ women screened annually from age 40). For men, LE gains were projected for all mutation carriers, ranging from 0.2 days (BRCA1+ men screened once at age 70) to 620 days (STK11+ men screened annually from age 40). For men and women who did not undergo genetic testing, or for whom testing showed no variant, screening yielded small LE benefit (0-2.1 days). CONCLUSIONS: Genetic testing of FDRs can inform targeted PDAC screening by identifying which FDRs may benefit.
BACKGROUND: First-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have elevated PDAC risk, partially due to germline genetic variants. We evaluated the potential effectiveness of genetic testing to target MRI-based screening among FDRs. METHODS: We used a microsimulation model of PDAC, calibrated to Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data, to estimate the potential life expectancy (LE) gain of screening for each of the following groups of FDRs: individuals who test positive for each of eight variants associated with elevated PDAC risk (e.g., BRCA2, CDKN2A); individuals who test negative; and individuals who do not test. Screening was assumed to take place if LE gains were achievable. We simulated multiple screening approaches, defined by starting age and frequency. Sensitivity analysis evaluated changes in results given varying model assumptions. RESULTS: For women, 92% of mutation carriers had projected LE gains from screening for PDAC, if screening strategies (start age, frequency) were optimized. Among carriers, LE gains ranged from 0.1 days (ATM+ women screened once at age 70) to 510 days (STK11+ women screened annually from age 40). For men, LE gains were projected for all mutation carriers, ranging from 0.2 days (BRCA1+ men screened once at age 70) to 620 days (STK11+ men screened annually from age 40). For men and women who did not undergo genetic testing, or for whom testing showed no variant, screening yielded small LE benefit (0-2.1 days). CONCLUSIONS: Genetic testing of FDRs can inform targeted PDAC screening by identifying which FDRs may benefit.
Authors: Elizabeth C Verna; Caroline Hwang; Peter D Stevens; Heidrun Rotterdam; Stavros N Stavropoulos; Carolyn D Sy; Martin A Prince; Wendy K Chung; Robert L Fine; John A Chabot; Harold Frucht Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-09-28 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Henry T Lynch; Randall E Brand; David Hogg; Carolyn A Deters; Ramon M Fusaro; Jane F Lynch; Ling Liu; Joseph Knezetic; Norman J Lassam; Michael Goggins; Scott Kern Journal: Cancer Date: 2002-01-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Marcia Irene Canto; Ralph H Hruban; Elliot K Fishman; Ihab R Kamel; Richard Schulick; Zhe Zhang; Mark Topazian; Naoki Takahashi; Joel Fletcher; Gloria Petersen; Alison P Klein; Jennifer Axilbund; Constance Griffin; Sapna Syngal; John R Saltzman; Koenraad J Mortele; Jeffrey Lee; Eric Tamm; Raghunandan Vikram; Priya Bhosale; Daniel Margolis; James Farrell; Michael Goggins Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2012-01-12 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Thomas A Laffan; Karen M Horton; Alison P Klein; Bruce Berlanstein; Stanley S Siegelman; Satomi Kawamoto; Pamela T Johnson; Elliot K Fishman; Ralph H Hruban Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Michael Goggins; Kasper Alexander Overbeek; Randall Brand; Sapna Syngal; Marco Del Chiaro; Detlef K Bartsch; Claudio Bassi; Alfredo Carrato; James Farrell; Elliot K Fishman; Paul Fockens; Thomas M Gress; Jeanin E van Hooft; R H Hruban; Fay Kastrinos; Allison Klein; Anne Marie Lennon; Aimee Lucas; Walter Park; Anil Rustgi; Diane Simeone; Elena Stoffel; Hans F A Vasen; Djuna L Cahen; Marcia Irene Canto; Marco Bruno Journal: Gut Date: 2019-10-31 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: J Iqbal; A Ragone; J Lubinski; H T Lynch; P Moller; P Ghadirian; W D Foulkes; S Armel; A Eisen; S L Neuhausen; L Senter; C F Singer; P Ainsworth; C Kim-Sing; N Tung; E Friedman; M Llacuachaqui; S Ping; S A Narod Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2012-10-25 Impact factor: 7.640