Literature DB >> 30050787

Review of radiological screening programmes for breast, lung and pancreatic malignancy.

Helena Barton1, David Shatti2, Charlotte Anne Jones1, Mathuri Sakthithasan1, Will W Loughborough3.   

Abstract

The premise of medical screening is to identify clinically occult disease, facilitating intervention at an early stage with the intention of improving prognosis. Identifying solid organ malignancy before nodal or distal metastases have occurred unanimously offers the best chance of successful radical treatment, thus there is clearly a potential significant mortality benefit for successful oncological screening programmes. However, the negative consequences of screening have to be considered, particularly the impact of intervening in asymptomatic populations. Diagnostic radiology has an invaluable ability to non-invasively detect disease and has developed an essential role in several oncological screening programmes with new programmes emerging. These include the established mammography screening programme for breast carcinoma, the emerging CT screening programme for lung carcinoma and a new proposed radiological screening programme for pancreatic carcinoma. Results from published randomized controlled trials analysing the benefits of radiological screening have been convoluted and conflicting. Cancer screening remains a widely contested topic and it is a challenge for both radiologist and clinician to assess the risks and benefits at both a population and individual patient level. In this article, we discuss radiological screening and analyse the current literature on these programmes, with evaluation of recently published studies and ongoing trials.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Radiology; malignancy; screening

Year:  2018        PMID: 30050787      PMCID: PMC6037950          DOI: 10.21037/qims.2018.05.06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  36 in total

1.  Screening for breast cancer in England: past and future.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.136

Review 2.  The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.

Authors:  M G Marmot; D G Altman; D A Cameron; J A Dewar; S G Thompson; M Wilcox
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 7.640

3.  Risk factors for adverse events related to polypectomy in the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.

Authors:  Matthew D Rutter; Claire Nickerson; Colin J Rees; Julietta Patnick; Roger G Blanks
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  Survival of patients with stage I lung cancer detected on CT screening.

Authors:  Claudia I Henschke; David F Yankelevitz; Daniel M Libby; Mark W Pasmantier; James P Smith; Olli S Miettinen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Short-term Results of a Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Swedish Screening Program for Individuals at Risk for Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Marco Del Chiaro; Caroline S Verbeke; Nikolaos Kartalis; Raffaella Pozzi Mucelli; Peter Gustafsson; Johan Hansson; Stephan L Haas; Ralf Segersvärd; Åke Andren-Sandberg; J-Matthias Löhr
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 14.766

6.  Participation and yield of colonoscopy versus non-cathartic CT colonography in population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Esther M Stoop; Margriet C de Haan; Thomas R de Wijkerslooth; Patrick M Bossuyt; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; C Yung Nio; Marc J van de Vijver; Katharina Biermann; Maarten Thomeer; Monique E van Leerdam; Paul Fockens; Jaap Stoker; Ernst J Kuipers; Evelien Dekker
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 7.  CT colonography for population screening of colorectal cancer: hints from European trials.

Authors:  Lapo Sali; Daniele Regge
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Risk of perforation after colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy: a population-based study.

Authors:  Nicolle M Gatto; Harold Frucht; Vijaya Sundararajan; Judith S Jacobson; Victor R Grann; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-02-05       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: randomised screening trial.

Authors:  Anthony B Miller; Claus Wall; Cornelia J Baines; Ping Sun; Teresa To; Steven A Narod
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-02-11

10.  UK Lung Cancer RCT Pilot Screening Trial: baseline findings from the screening arm provide evidence for the potential implementation of lung cancer screening.

Authors:  J K Field; S W Duffy; D R Baldwin; D K Whynes; A Devaraj; K E Brain; T Eisen; J Gosney; B A Green; J A Holemans; T Kavanagh; K M Kerr; M Ledson; K J Lifford; F E McRonald; A Nair; R D Page; M K B Parmar; D M Rassl; R C Rintoul; N J Screaton; N J Wald; D Weller; P R Williamson; G Yadegarfar; D M Hansell
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 9.139

View more
  6 in total

1.  Ultrasound-guided percutaneous needle biopsy skill for peripheral lung lesions and complications prevention.

Authors:  Hongxia Zhang; Yang Guang; Wen He; Linggang Cheng; Tengfei Yu; Yu Tang; Haiman Song; Xin Liu; Yukang Zhang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Can Pre-biopsy Second-Look Breast Ultrasound Affect Clinical Management? Experience From a Single Tertiary Hospital.

Authors:  Li Ma; Jing Qin; Lingyan Kong; Jialin Zhao; Mengsu Xiao; Hongyan Wang; Jing Zhang; Yuxin Jiang; Jianchu Li; He Liu; Qingli Zhu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Quantitative radiomic model for predicting malignancy of small solid pulmonary nodules detected by low-dose CT screening.

Authors:  Liting Mao; Huan Chen; Mingzhu Liang; Kunwei Li; Jiebing Gao; Peixin Qin; Xianglian Ding; Xin Li; Xueguo Liu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2019-02

4.  An investigation of the classification accuracy of a deep learning framework-based computer-aided diagnosis system in different pathological types of breast lesions.

Authors:  Mengsu Xiao; Chenyang Zhao; Qingli Zhu; Jing Zhang; He Liu; Jianchu Li; Yuxin Jiang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Characteristics of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and strain elastography of locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Li-Shuang Gu; Rui Zhang; Yong Wang; Xue-Mei Liu; Fei Ma; Jia-Yu Wang; Xiao-Ying Sun; Meng-Jia Liu; Bo Wang; Shuang-Mei Zou
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 6.  The Role of Imaging in Health Screening: Overview, Rationale of Screening, and Screening Economics.

Authors:  David H Ballard; Kirsteen R Burton; Nikita Lakomkin; Shannon Kim; Prabhakar Rajiah; Midhir J Patel; Parisa Mazaheri; Gary J Whitman
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 3.173

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.