Literature DB >> 26240684

Methods and outcomes of screening for pancreatic adenocarcinoma in high-risk individuals.

Gabriele Capurso1, Marianna Signoretti1, Roberto Valente1, Urban Arnelo1, Matthias Lohr1, Jan-Werner Poley1, Gianfranco Delle Fave1, Marco Del Chiaro1.   

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a lethal neoplasia, for which secondary prevention (i.e., screening) is advisable for high-risk individuals with "familiar pancreatic cancer" and with other specific genetic syndromes (Peutz-Jeghers, p16, BRCA2, PALB and mismatch repair gene mutation carriers). There is limited evidence regarding the accuracy of screening tests, their acceptability, costs and availability, and agreement on whom to treat. Successful target of screening are small resectable PDAC, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms with high-grade dysplasia and advanced pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Both magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) are employed for screening, and the overall yield for pre-malignant or malignant pancreatic lesions is of about 20% with EUS and 14% with MRI/magnetic resonance colangiopancreatography. EUS performs better for solid and MRI for cystic lesions. However, only 2% of these detected lesions can be considered a successful target, and there are insufficient data demonstrating that resection of benign or low grade lesions improves survival. Many patients in the published studies therefore seemed to have received an overtreatment by undergoing surgery. It is crucial to better stratify the risk of malignancy individually, and to better define optimal screening intervals and methods either with computerized tools or molecular biomarkers, possibly in large multicentre studies. At the moment, screening should be carefully performed within research protocols at experienced centres, offering involved individuals medical and psychological advice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endoscopic ultrasound; High-risk individuals; Magnetic resonance; Pancreatic cancer; Screening

Year:  2015        PMID: 26240684      PMCID: PMC4515417          DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i9.833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc


  44 in total

1.  Pancreatic cancer screening in a prospective cohort of high-risk patients: a comprehensive strategy of imaging and genetics.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Verna; Caroline Hwang; Peter D Stevens; Heidrun Rotterdam; Stavros N Stavropoulos; Carolyn D Sy; Martin A Prince; Wendy K Chung; Robert L Fine; John A Chabot; Harold Frucht
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Familial pancreatic cancer in Italy. Risk assessment, screening programs and clinical approach: a position paper from the Italian Registry.

Authors:  Marco Del Chiaro; Alessandro Zerbi; Gabriele Capurso; Giuseppe Zamboni; Patrick Maisonneuve; Silvano Presciuttini; Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono; Lucia Calculli; Massimo Falconi
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 4.088

3.  Short-term Results of a Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Swedish Screening Program for Individuals at Risk for Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Marco Del Chiaro; Caroline S Verbeke; Nikolaos Kartalis; Raffaella Pozzi Mucelli; Peter Gustafsson; Johan Hansson; Stephan L Haas; Ralf Segersvärd; Åke Andren-Sandberg; J-Matthias Löhr
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 4.  Early detection and prevention of pancreatic cancer: is it really possible today?

Authors:  Marco Del Chiaro; Ralf Segersvärd; Matthias Lohr; Caroline Verbeke
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Value of EUS in early detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas in patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.

Authors:  Ken Kamata; Masayuki Kitano; Masatoshi Kudo; Hiroki Sakamoto; Kumpei Kadosaka; Takeshi Miyata; Hajime Imai; Kiyoshi Maekawa; Takaaki Chikugo; Masashi Kumano; Tomoko Hyodo; Takamichi Murakami; Yasutaka Chiba; Yoshifumi Takeyama
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  The yield of first-time endoscopic ultrasonography in screening individuals at a high risk of developing pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  J W Poley; I Kluijt; D J Gouma; F Harinck; A Wagner; C Aalfs; C H J van Eijck; A Cats; E J Kuipers; Y Nio; P Fockens; M J Bruno
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Clinical usefulness of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 as a screening test for pancreatic cancer in an asymptomatic population.

Authors:  Jee-Eun Kim; Kyu Taek Lee; Jong Kyun Lee; Seung Woon Paik; Jong Chul Rhee; Kyoo Wan Choi
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.029

8.  Five years of prospective screening of high-risk individuals from families with familial pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  P Langer; P H Kann; V Fendrich; N Habbe; M Schneider; M Sina; E P Slater; J T Heverhagen; T M Gress; M Rothmund; D K Bartsch
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2009-05-25       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Multiple small "imaging" branch-duct type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) in familial pancreatic cancer: indicator for concomitant high grade pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia?

Authors:  D K Bartsch; K Dietzel; M Bargello; E Matthaei; G Kloeppel; I Esposito; J T Heverhagen; T M Gress; E P Slater; P Langer
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 10.  Current roles of endoscopy in the management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas.

Authors:  Masao Tanaka
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 7.559

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Clinical applications of circulating tumor DNA and circulating tumor cells in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Francesca Riva; Oleksii I Dronov; Dmytro I Khomenko; Florence Huguet; Christophe Louvet; Pascale Mariani; Marc-Henri Stern; Olivier Lantz; Charlotte Proudhon; Jean-Yves Pierga; Francois-Clement Bidard
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 2.  Non-invasive biomarkers in pancreatic cancer diagnosis: what we need versus what we have.

Authors:  Marta Herreros-Villanueva; Luis Bujanda
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-04

3.  Intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Dailin Rong; Yize Mao; Wanming Hu; Shuhang Xu; Jun Wang; Haoqiang He; Shengping Li; Rong Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Pancreatic Cancer: An Emphasis on Current Perspectives in Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Krishna Patel; Sohail Siraj; Chloe Smith; Maya Nair; Jamboor K Vishwanatha; Riyaz Basha
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncog       Date:  2019

5.  Long-term positive psychological outcomes in an Australian pancreatic cancer screening program.

Authors:  R S O'Neill; B Meiser; S Emmanuel; D B Williams; A Stoita
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Appropriateness of pancreatic resection in high-risk individuals for familial pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a patient-level meta-analysis and proposition of the Beaujon score.

Authors:  Louis de Mestier; Marie Muller; Jérôme Cros; Marie-Pierre Vullierme; Dewi Vernerey; Frédérique Maire; Safi Dokmak; Vinciane Rebours; Alain Sauvanet; Philippe Lévy; Pascal Hammel
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2019-01-12       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 7.  Results of surveillance in individuals at high-risk of pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marianna Signoretti; Marco J Bruno; Giulia Zerboni; Jan-Werner Poley; Gianfranco Delle Fave; Gabriele Capurso
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 8.  Detecting circulating tumor material and digital pathology imaging during pancreatic cancer progression.

Authors:  Radim Moravec; Rao Divi; Mukesh Verma
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-06-15

Review 9.  Challenges in diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Lulu Zhang; Santosh Sanagapalli; Alina Stoita
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Improvement of Diagnostic Accuracy for Pancreatic Cancer with Serum Lactate Dehydrogenase.

Authors:  Xi Wang; Chunbin Wang; Haijun Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 3.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.