| Literature DB >> 25853016 |
Kohei Hanaoka1, Makoto Hosono2, Yoichi Tatsumi3, Kazunari Ishii4, Sung-Woon Im1, Norio Tsuchiya2, Kenta Sakaguchi2, Itaru Matsumura3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to quantitatively evaluate the tumor accumulation and heterogeneity of (111)In-ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin®) and tumor accumulation of (18)F-fluoro-deoxyglucose (FDG) and compare them to the tumor response in B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients receiving (90)Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin®) therapy.Entities:
Keywords: FDG; Heterogeneity; Ibritumomab tiuxetan; PET/CT; Radioimmunotherapy; SPECT/CT
Year: 2015 PMID: 25853016 PMCID: PMC4385239 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-015-0093-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EJNMMI Res Impact factor: 3.138
Characteristics of all 16 patients investigated in this study
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 49 | M | 93.4 | IIIb | 1 | 23 | 65 | 2 | CRu |
| 2 | 74 | M | 63.4 | IIIa | 2 | 4 | 63 | 2 | CR |
| 3 | 67 | F | 50.6 | II | 4 | 57 | 91 | 4 | PR |
| 4 | 61 | F | 54.6 | I | 1 | 50 | 78 | 1 | CR |
| 5 | 58 | M | 73.6 | I | 1 | 55 | 58 | 1 | CR |
| 6 | 72 | M | 66.4 | IV | 2 | 71 | 68 | 7 | CR |
| 7 | 71 | F | 57.7 | IV | 2 | 58 | 75 | 5 | CR |
| 8 | 73 | M | 63.4 | II | 3 | 14 | 64 | 4 | PD |
| 9 | 66 | M | 62.9 | IIIa | 3 | 33 | 62 | 6 | SD |
| 10 | 71 | M | 53.6 | I | 2 | 42 | 77 | 1 | SD |
| 11 | 68 | F | 49.1 | IV | 3 | 27 | 62 | 1 | CR |
| 12 | 79 | F | 43.0 | IV | 1 | 53 | 65 | 1 | SD |
| 13 | 61 | F | 60.7 | I | 2 | 41 | 92 | 1 | PD |
| 14 | 76 | M | 57.3 | III | 1 | 50 | 99 | 1 | CR |
| 15 | 65 | M | 50.7 | IV | 1 | 46 | 62 | 4 | CR |
| 16 | 66 | M | 49.0 | III | 1 | 15 | 75 | 1 | PR |
aLesions analyzed in this study; bbased on the International Workshop Criteria (IWC). CR, complete response; CRu, unconfirmed complete response; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response.
Figure 1Comparison of the diameter (mm) of pretherapeutic lesions between responders and non-responders. The median value and the interquartile range are represented by box plot.
Figure 2Correlation between pretherapeutic FDG SUVmax and In-ibritumomab tiuxetan SUVmax in all lesions. The solid line is the progression line. Dotted lines represent 95% confidence intervals of the progression line.
Figure 3Comparison of pretherapeutic FDG SUVmax between responders and non-responders. The median value and the interquartile range are represented by box plot.
Comparison of FDG accumulation and intratumoral distribution between responders and non-responders
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| SUVmax | 4.8 ± 2.0 | 8.5 ± 4.7 | <0.05 |
| Skewness | 1.07 ± 0.29 | 1.17 ± 0.40 | n. s. |
| Kurtosis | 3.56 ± 0.91 | 3.99 ± 1.34 | n. s. |
| AUC-CSH | 0.30 ± 0.05 | 0.30 ± 0.06 | n. s. |
n. s., not significant.
Figure 4Representative CT and fused image of the markedly accumulation of In-ibritumomab tiuxetan in the para-aortic lymph node (arrow). A male patient with B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma had a standardized uptake value of para-aortic lymph node of 3.81, skewness of 0.813, kurtosis of 2.95, and AUC-CSH of 0.344.
Comparison of In-ibritumomab tiuxetan accumulation and intratumoral distribution between responders and non-responders
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| SUVmax | 2.74 ± 1.43 | 3.29 ± 1.47 | n. s. |
| % ID/g | 0.0022 ± 0.0009 | 0.0024 ± 0.0008 | n. s. |
| Skewness | 0.58 ± 0.16 | 0.73 ± 0.24 | <0.05 |
| Kurtosis | 2.39 ± 0.32 | 2.78 ± 0.53 | <0.02 |
| AUC-CSH | 0.37 ± 0.04 | 0.34 ± 0.05 | <0.05 |
n. s., not significant.