Literature DB >> 17909793

Semiautomatic volume of interest drawing for (18)F-FDG image analysis-method and preliminary results.

A J Green1, R J Francis, S Baig, R H J Begent.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Functional imaging of cancer adds important information to the conventional measurements in monitoring response. Serial (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET), which indicates changes in glucose metabolism in tumours, shows great promise for this. However, there is a need for a method to quantitate alterations in uptake of FDG, which accounts for changes in tumour volume and intensity of FDG uptake. Selection of regions or volumes [ROI or volumes of interest (VOI)] by hand drawing, or simple thresholding, suffers from operator-dependent drawbacks.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We present a simple, robust VOI growing method for this application. The method requires a single seed point within the visualised tumour and another in relevant normal tissue. The drawn tumour VOI is insensitive to the operator inconsistency and is, thus, a suitable basis for comparative measurements. The method is validated using a software phantom. We demonstrate the use of the method in the assessment of tumour response in 31 patients receiving chemotherapy for various carcinomas.
RESULTS: Valid assessment of tumour response could be made 2-4 weeks after starting chemotherapy, giving information for clinical decision making which would otherwise have taken 9-12 weeks. Survival was predicted from FDG-PET 2-4 weeks after starting chemotherapy (p = 0.04) and after 9-12 weeks FDG-PET gave a better prediction of survival (p = 0.002) than CT or MRI (p = 0.015).
CONCLUSIONS: FDG-PET using this method of analysis has potential as a routine tool for optimising use of chemotherapy and improving its cost effectiveness. It also has potential for increasing the accuracy of response assessment in clinical trials of novel therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17909793     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-007-0602-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  24 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  The specific uptake size index for quantifying radiopharmaceutical uptake.

Authors:  John S Fleming; Livia Bolt; Jennifer S Stratford; Paul M Kemp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-07-21       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 3.  CT and PET in stomach cancer: preoperative staging and monitoring of response to therapy.

Authors:  Joon Seok Lim; Mi Jin Yun; Myeong-Jin Kim; Woo Jin Hyung; Mi-Suk Park; Jin-Young Choi; Tae-Sung Kim; Jong Doo Lee; Sung Hoon Noh; Ki Whang Kim
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

4.  Positron emission tomography in the clinical evaluation of metastatic cancer.

Authors:  A J Fischman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Reproducibility of metabolic measurements in malignant tumors using FDG PET.

Authors:  W A Weber; S I Ziegler; R Thödtmann; A R Hanauske; M Schwaiger
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Primary and metastatic breast carcinoma: initial clinical evaluation with PET with the radiolabeled glucose analogue 2-[F-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose.

Authors:  R L Wahl; R L Cody; G D Hutchins; E E Mudgett
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  18F-FDG PET evaluation of the response to therapy for lymphoma and for breast, lung, and colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Lale Kostakoglu; Stanley J Goldsmith
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Standardized uptake values of FDG: body surface area correction is preferable to body weight correction.

Authors:  C K Kim; N C Gupta; B Chandramouli; A Alavi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Noninvasive monitoring of tumor metabolism using fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography in colorectal cancer liver metastases: correlation with tumor response to fluorouracil.

Authors:  M Findlay; H Young; D Cunningham; A Iveson; B Cronin; T Hickish; B Pratt; J Husband; M Flower; R Ott
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: a simulation study.

Authors:  Ronald Boellaard; Nanda C Krak; Otto S Hoekstra; Adriaan A Lammertsma
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Imaging in targeted delivery of therapy to cancer.

Authors:  Gairin Dancey; Richard H Begent; Tim Meyer
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 4.493

2.  Accuracy of perfusion MRI with high spatial but low temporal resolution to assess invasive breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Cédric de Bazelaire; Raphael Calmon; Isabelle Thomassin; Clément Brunon; Anne-Sophie Hamy; Laure Fournier; Daniel Balvay; Marc Espié; Nathalie Siauve; Olivier Clément; Eric de Kerviler; Charles-André Cuénod
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Heterogeneity of intratumoral (111)In-ibritumomab tiuxetan and (18)F-FDG distribution in association with therapeutic response in radioimmunotherapy for B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  Kohei Hanaoka; Makoto Hosono; Yoichi Tatsumi; Kazunari Ishii; Sung-Woon Im; Norio Tsuchiya; Kenta Sakaguchi; Itaru Matsumura
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 3.138

4.  An Adaptive Thresholding Method for BTV Estimation Incorporating PET Reconstruction Parameters: A Multicenter Study of the Robustness and the Reliability.

Authors:  M Brambilla; R Matheoud; C Basile; C Bracco; I Castiglioni; C Cavedon; M Cremonesi; S Morzenti; F Fioroni; M Giri; F Botta; F Gallivanone; E Grassi; M Pacilio; E De Ponti; M Stasi; S Pasetto; S Valzano; D Zanni
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 2.238

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.