Literature DB >> 25851109

Accuracy of 3D dual echo steady state (DESS) MR arthrography to quantify acetabular cartilage thickness.

Christine L Abraham1,2, Neal K Bangerter3,4, Lance S McGavin2, Christopher L Peters2, Alex J Drew1,2, Christopher J Hanrahan3, Andrew E Anderson1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To deploy and quantify the accuracy of 3D dual echo steady state (DESS) MR arthrography with hip traction to image acetabular cartilage. Clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences used to image hip cartilage often have reduced out-of-plane resolution and may lack adequate signal-to-noise to image cartilage.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Saline was injected into four cadaver hips placed under traction. 3D DESS MRI scans were obtained before and after cores of cartilage were harvested from the acetabulum; the two MRIs were spatially aligned to reference core positions. The thickness of cartilage cores was measured under microscopy to serve as the reference standard. 3D reconstructions of cartilage and subchondral bone were generated using automatic and semiautomatic image segmentation. Cartilage thickness estimated from the 3D reconstructions was compared to physical measurements using Bland-Altman plots.
RESULTS: As revealed by the automatic segmentation mask, saline imbibed the joint space throughout the articulating surface, with the exception of the posteroinferior region in two hips. Locations where air bubbles were introduced and regions of suspected low density bone disrupted an otherwise smooth automatic segmentation mask. Automatic and semiautomatic segmentation yielded a bias ± repeatability coefficient (95% limits of agreement) of 0.10 ± 0.51 mm (-0.41 to 0.61 mm) and 0.06 ± 0.43 mm (-0.37 to 0.49 mm), respectively.
CONCLUSION: Cartilage thickness can be estimated to within ∼0.5 mm of the physical value with 95% confidence using 3D reconstructions of 3D DESS MR arthrography images. Manual correction of the automatic segmentation mask may improve reconstruction accuracy.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DESS MRI; cartilage imaging; cartilage thickness; hip; osteoarthritis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25851109      PMCID: PMC4595156          DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  42 in total

1.  Comparing methods of clinical measurement: reporting standards for bland and altman analysis.

Authors:  S Mantha; M F Roizen; L A Fleisher; R Thisted; J Foss
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Surgical dislocation of the adult hip a technique with full access to the femoral head and acetabulum without the risk of avascular necrosis.

Authors:  R Ganz; T J Gill; E Gautier; K Ganz; N Krügel; U Berlemann
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-11

3.  Quantitative determination of joint incongruity and pressure distribution during simulated gait and cartilage thickness in the human hip joint.

Authors:  R von Eisenhart; C Adam; M Steinlechner; M Müller-Gerbl; F Eckstein
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  Do occupation-related physical factors contribute to arthritis?

Authors:  D T Felson
Journal:  Baillieres Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1994-02

7.  Width of the articular cartilage of the hip: quantification by using fat-suppression spin-echo MR imaging in cadavers.

Authors:  J Hodler; D Trudell; M N Pathria; D Resnick
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Thickness of human articular cartilage in joints of the lower limb.

Authors:  D E Shepherd; B B Seedhom
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  Comparative study of the intrinsic mechanical properties of the human acetabular and femoral head cartilage.

Authors:  K A Athanasiou; A Agarwal; F J Dzida
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Three-dimensional distribution of acetabular cartilage thickness in patients with hip dysplasia: a fully automated computational analysis of MR imaging.

Authors:  Takashi Nishii; Nobuhiko Sugano; Yoshinobu Sato; Hisashi Tanaka; Hidenobu Miki; Hideki Yoshikawa
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.576

View more
  10 in total

1.  Can measurements from an anteroposterior radiograph predict pelvic sagittal inclination?

Authors:  Keisuke Uemura; Penny R Atkins; Masashi Okamoto; Kunihiko Tokunaga; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  MR arthrography of the hip: evaluation of isotropic 3D intermediate-weighted FSE and hybrid GRE T1-weighted sequences.

Authors:  Giovanni Foti; Antonio Campacci; Michele Conati; Mirko Trentadue; Claudio Zorzi; Giovanni Carbognin
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  CORR Insights®: Increased Hip Stresses Resulting From a Cam Deformity and Decreased Femoral Neck-Shaft Angle During Level Walking.

Authors:  Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Hip chondrolabral mechanics during activities of daily living: Role of the labrum and interstitial fluid pressurization.

Authors:  Jocelyn N Todd; Travis G Maak; Gerard A Ateshian; Steve A Maas; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Differences of radiocarpal cartilage alterations in arthritis and osteoarthritis using morphological and biochemical magnetic resonance imaging without gadolinium-based contrast agent administration.

Authors:  Valentina Mori; Lino M Sawicki; Philipp Sewerin; Markus Eichner; Benedikt M Schaarschmidt; Lisa Oezel; Sebastian Gehrmann; Bernd Bittersohl; Gerald Antoch; Christoph Schleich
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Automatic MRI-based Three-dimensional Models of Hip Cartilage Provide Improved Morphologic and Biochemical Analysis.

Authors:  Florian Schmaranzer; Ronja Helfenstein; Guodong Zeng; Till D Lerch; Eduardo N Novais; James D Wylie; Young-Jo Kim; Klaus A Siebenrock; Moritz Tannast; Guoyan Zheng
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Utility of radial reformation of three-dimensional fat-suppressed multi-echo gradient-recalled-echo images for the evaluation of acetabular labral injuries and femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Takahiro Sueoka; Keizo Tanitame; Yukiko Honda; Takeshi Shoji; Takuma Yamasaki; Nobuo Adachi; Awai Kazuo
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Acetabular Cartilage Thickness Differs Among Cam, Pincer, or Mixed-Type Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Descriptive Study Using In Vivo Ultrasonic Measurements During Surgical Hip Dislocation.

Authors:  Simon Damian Steppacher; Malin Kristin Meier; Christoph Emanuel Albers; Moritz Tannast; Klaus Arno Siebenrock
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 9.  MRI-based hip cartilage measures in osteoarthritic and non-osteoarthritic individuals: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hector N Aguilar; Michele C Battié; Jacob L Jaremko
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2017-03-22

10.  Multiple-echo steady-state (MESS): Extending DESS for joint T2 mapping and chemical-shift corrected water-fat separation.

Authors:  Frank Zijlstra; Peter R Seevinck
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 4.668

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.