Literature DB >> 1632354

Width of the articular cartilage of the hip: quantification by using fat-suppression spin-echo MR imaging in cadavers.

J Hodler1, D Trudell, M N Pathria, D Resnick.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Use of MR imaging to measure the width of the articular cartilage has not been thoroughly investigated. The value of a selective fat-suppression spin-echo sequence in the quantitative assessment of articular cartilage of the hip was studied in cadavers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sagittal and coronal images were acquired in 10 cadaveric hips (age range at time of death, 62-81 years). On the coronal and sagittal MR images that were closest to the center of the femoral head, marks were placed every 30 degrees, with the midpoint of the femoral head used as a reference. Cartilage thickness was measured in 123 resulting locations. Sixty-three positions included both femoral and acetabular cartilages, and 60 positions included femoral cartilage without an acetabular counterpart. The findings were compared with corresponding anatomic sections.
RESULTS: For the 60 locations containing only femoral cartilage, significant correlation between MR and anatomic sections was found (Pearson correlation coefficient = .34, p = .0089). Of the 63 locations containing both femoral and acetabular cartilages, the two cartilage layers could be differentiated on the MR images in 50 locations. In these 50, the MR and anatomic measurements of the femoral cartilage correlated significant (r = .58, p less than or equal to .0001). Measurements of the acetabular cartilage in these 50 locations yielded no significant correlation (r = .25, p = .08). When the entire cartilage (femoral plus acetabular) was measured in all 63 locations, the correlation between MR and anatomic measurements was .29 (p = .02). The correlation coefficients obtained in this investigation indicate considerable scattering of the data.
CONCLUSION: Our results show that measurements of articular cartilage thickness of the hip on fat-suppression spin-echo MR images are not sufficiently accurate to be of clinical value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1632354     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.159.2.1632354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  16 in total

1.  A volume adjustable four-coil phased array for high resolution MR imaging of the hip.

Authors:  W E Kwok; K K Lo; G Seo; S M Totterman
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Technical note: the design of a stereotactic frame for direct MRI-anatomical correlation of the brachial plexus.

Authors:  Tom Van Hoof; Cyriel Mabilde; Luc Leybaert; Koenraad Verstraete; Katharina D'Herde
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2005-10-25       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 3.  Imaging osteoarthritis: magnetic resonance imaging versus x-ray.

Authors:  Charles Peterfy; Manish Kothari
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.592

4.  The distribution of cartilage thickness within the joints of the lower limb of elderly individuals.

Authors:  C Adam; F Eckstein; S Milz; R Putz
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 5.  Optimizing joint imaging: MR imaging techniques.

Authors:  G Adam; M Drobnitzky; C C Nolte-Ernsting; R W Günther
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Chondral degeneration and therapeutic hip arthroscopy.

Authors:  N P Walton; I Jahromi; P L Lewis
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-09-10       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Accuracy of 3D dual echo steady state (DESS) MR arthrography to quantify acetabular cartilage thickness.

Authors:  Christine L Abraham; Neal K Bangerter; Lance S McGavin; Christopher L Peters; Alex J Drew; Christopher J Hanrahan; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Thickness of patellofemoral articular cartilage as measured on MR imaging: sequence comparison of accuracy, reproducibility, and interobserver variation.

Authors:  M D van Leersum; M E Schweitzer; F Gannon; S Vinitski; G Finkel; D G Mitchell
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 9.  Osteoarthritis and magnetic resonance imaging: potential and problems.

Authors:  C W Hutton; W Vennart
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging in osteoarthrosis of the dysplastic hip.

Authors:  Y Hasegawa; H Fukatsu; T Matsuda; T Iwase; H Iwata
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.