Literature DB >> 2584850

Nasal airflow: resistance and sensation.

A S Jones1, D J Willatt, L M Durham.   

Abstract

For many years nasal resistance to airflow measured by rhinomanometry has been regarded as the objective measure of nasal patency. However, recently it has become apparent that this may not be the case. The present study was designed to affirm or refute this view by using large numbers of subjects and observations. Five hundred estimations of (objective) nasal resistance to airflow and (subjective) nasal sensation of airflow where carried out. No correlation could be demonstrated between these two parameters. It is concluded nasal resistance to airflow and nasal sensation of airflow are two separate modalities which are not directly related. The possible reasons for this finding are discussed with reference to previous work on nasal sensation.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2584850     DOI: 10.1017/s0022215100110485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laryngol Otol        ISSN: 0022-2151            Impact factor:   1.469


  15 in total

1.  Comparison of the clinical efficacy of standard and mucoadhesive-based nasal decongestants.

Authors:  Christo T Tzachev; Mariana Mandajieva; Evgeniy H Minkov; Todor A Popov
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Sensation of nasal patency compared to rhinomanometric results after septoplasty.

Authors:  Tamás Tompos; Tibor Garai; Béla Zemplén; Imre Gerlinger
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  [Diagnostic methods of nasal respiratory function].

Authors:  G Mlynski; A Beule
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Reliability and validity of the Italian nose obstruction symptom evaluation (I-NOSE) scale.

Authors:  Francesco Mozzanica; Emanuele Urbani; Murat Atac; Gianluca Scottà; Ketty Luciano; Chiara Bulgheroni; Valeria De Cristofaro; Roberto Gera; Antonio Schindler; Francesco Ottaviani
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Work related impairment of nasal function in Swedish woodwork teachers.

Authors:  M Ahman; M Holmström; I Cynkier; E Söderman
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 6.  A systematic review of patient-reported nasal obstruction scores: defining normative and symptomatic ranges in surgical patients.

Authors:  John S Rhee; Corbin D Sullivan; Dennis O Frank; Julia S Kimbell; Guilherme J M Garcia
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.611

7.  Perception of better nasal patency correlates with increased mucosal cooling after surgery for nasal obstruction.

Authors:  Corbin D Sullivan; Guilherme J M Garcia; Dennis O Frank-Ito; Julia S Kimbell; John S Rhee
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 8.  The way the wind blows: implications of modeling nasal airflow.

Authors:  Kai Zhao; Pamela Dalton
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.806

9.  [CT rhinometry : a correlation of rhinomanometry and multiplanar computer tomography of the nasal cavity].

Authors:  K W G Eichhorn; B Schneider; T A Bley; I Wagner; A Schröck; M Jakob
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.284

10.  Acoustic rhinometry in rhinological practice: discussion paper.

Authors:  E W Fisher; V J Lund; G K Scadding
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 18.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.